Cited by 59Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Comparing clinical and research treatments for eating disorders

Haas, Heather L., Clopton, James R.·2003·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

Objective This study evaluated whether there is a gap between research and practice in the treatment of eating disorders. Method Psychologists in clinical practice (N = 126) were surveyed regarding their treatment of a recent client with an eating disorder and a content analysis of published treatment outcome studies for eating disorders (N = 76) was conducted. Results The treatment of eating disorders in clinical and research settings was found to differ significantly on several variables, including the types of therapeutic issues addressed and the frequency of comorbidity seen in clients. Logistic regression analyses found that the frequency with which psychologists read journal articles about eating disorders was significantly related to whether their clients received empirically validated treatment. Discussion Psychologists in clinical practice are not using empirically validated treatments not only because of a lack of training but also because such treatments provide little guidance for dealing with the issues and comorbid problems that their clients with eating disorders often have.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.10156

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haas, H. L., & Clopton, J. R.
Affiliations
Texas Tech University (US)
Corresponding author
Clopton, James R.
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-03-20
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
412-420
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W2075870077
Cited by
59
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
eating disorders, empirically supported treatments, research-practice gap, clinical psychologists, treatment outcome studies, comorbidities, intervention fidelity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Clinical Competence, Data Collection, Depressive Disorder, Education, Continuing, Female, Humans, Male, Periodicals as Topic, Psychology, Clinical, Psychotherapy, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Research, Comorbidity, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review