Cited by 26Eating Disorders and BehaviorsMedia Influence and HealthNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Are recovery stories helpful for women with eating disorders? A pilot study and commentary on future research

Open access
Dawson, Lisa, Mullan, Barbara, Touyz, Stephen, Rhodes, Paul·2018·Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anecdotally it is well known that eating disorder memoirs are popular with people with anorexia nervosa and recovery stories are readily available online. However, no research to date has empirically explored whether such stories are helpful for current sufferers. The aim of the current pilot study was to explore the efficacy of recovery narratives as a means of improving motivation and self-efficacy and to qualitatively explore patient perspectives of such stories. METHOD: Fifty-seven women with anorexia nervosa and subclinical anorexia nervosa participated in this online study. Participants were randomised to either receive recovery stories or to a wait-list control group. After completing baseline measures, participants read five stories about recovery, and completed post-intervention measures two weeks later. RESULTS: The quantitative results indicated that reading stories of recovery had no effect on motivation and self-efficacy over a two-week period. In contrast, the qualitative results showed that the stories generated thoughts about the possibility of recovery and the majority indicated they would recommend them to others. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to a growing body of research exploring the integration of voices of lived experience into treatment approaches. Future research should focus on 1) identifying for whom and at which stage of illness recovery stories might be helpful; 2) the mechanism via which they might operate; and 3) the most helpful way of presenting such stories.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40337-018-0206-2

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Support via telephone calls or personalised feedback are essential, as studies that utilised such support generated larger effect sizes and had lower drop-out rates than those without such support.

    “Alongside these technologies, support via telephone calls or personalised feedback are suggested to be essential, as studies that utilised such support generated larger effect sizes and had lower drop-out rates than those without such support.20”

    From Recovery-focused self-help intervention using vodcasts for patients with personality disorder: Feasibility randomised controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Method > Procedure section describes an emailed recovery-stories intervention, and Results > Test of representativeness discusses drop-out within that study. Neither section compares studies with telephone or personalised support against studies without it. Searches for those forms of support, effect sizes and drop-out rates found no passage making the claimed comparison. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent findings suggest that exposure to recovery narratives may not directly increase motivation to change, or could evoke positive as well as negative responses.

    “recent findings suggest that exposure to recovery narratives may not directly increase motivation to change, or could evoke positive as well as negative (e.g. social comparative) responses”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [10]Epston D Narrative therapy and community work: a conference collection 1999 Adelaide Dulwich Centre Publications
  2. [50]Fairburn CG Cooper Z Fairburn CG WG T The eating disorder examination Binge eating: nature, assessment, and treatment Volume 12 1993 New York Guildford Press 317 360
  3. [54]Hetherington J. Peer-supported open dialogue. Therapy Today. 2015;26:26–9.

Authors
Dawson, L., Mullan, B., Touyz, S., & Rhodes, P.
Affiliations
  • St Vincent’s Private Hospital Sydney (AU)
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Dawson, Lisa
Venue
Journal of Eating Disorders
Published
2018-08-15
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
21-21
ISSN
2050-2974 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2885628341
Cited by
26
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
anorexia nervosa, recovery stories, recovery narratives, women, motivation, self-efficacy, lived experience, patient perspectives, online intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review