The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
General considerations for research with vulnerable populations: ten lessons for success
Open accessAbstract
This paper offers practical insights for researchers who conduct studies with vulnerable populations, including those using secondary data sources from government entities. The paper is based on the approval process to secure secondary government data from a Midwestern county juvenile probation department and the state courts for the author’s dissertation study. This paper proposes general considerations and ten lessons learned to successfully conduct research with vulnerable populations and/or their information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“However, this knowledge is greatly limited because most studies included small, homogeneous samples, and their conclusions were mostly based on qualitative retrospective assessments of individuals’ beliefs about what led to sustainment success or failure, rather than based on statistical tests of their association [17–22].”
From Using qualitative comparative analysis to uncover multiple pathways to program sustainment: implications for community-based youth substance misuse prevention (2022) · cites this paper as [19]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“and that organizational capacity, such as having adequate resources and staff to deliver the program [19, 24, 31, 53] is integral to a program’s success and continued delivery.”
From Using qualitative comparative analysis to uncover multiple pathways to program sustainment: implications for community-based youth substance misuse prevention (2022) · cites this paper as [19]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Eckstein, S. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511550089.028 · Cited by 3,646
Psychiatric Disorders in Youth in Juvenile Detention
Teplin, L. A., Abram, K. M., McClelland, G. M., Dulcan, M. K., & Mericle, A. A. (2002) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.59.12.1133 · Cited by 1,674
Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 1999 National Report
Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (1999) · Cited by 1,518
Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 1999 National Report
(1999) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e379692004-005 · Cited by 1,464
Handbook of Early Childhood Intervention
Zigler, E. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511529320 · Cited by 1,397
Black, H. C. (1891) · Virginia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1066423 · Cited by 1,256
Juvenile offenders and victims
Sickmund, M. (1997) · Cited by 971
Protective Factors and Individual Resilience
Werner, E. Ε. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511529320.008 · Cited by 938
The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: a review of systematic reviews
Lipsey, M. W., & Cullen, F. T. (2007) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112833 · Cited by 763
Comorbid Psychiatric Disorders in Youth in Juvenile Detention
Abram, K. M., Teplin, L. A., McClelland, G. M., & Dulcan, M. K. (2003) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.11.1097 · Cited by 580
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- American Bar Association and National Bar Association. (2001). Justice by Gender: The lack of appropriate prevention, diversion and treatment alternatives for girls in the justice system. Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
- Hornblum, AM. (1998). Acres of skin: Human experiments in Holmesberg Prison. New York: Routledge.
- Orbis Partners, Inc. (2007). Long-term validation of the Youth Assessment and Screening Instrument (YASI) in New York State juvenile probation. Retrieved June 18, 2012, from http://YASI-Long-Term-Validation-Report.pdf .
Cited by
Cooper, B. R., Hill, L. G., Parker, L., Jenkins, G. J., Shrestha, G., & Funaiole, A. (2022) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-022-00303-4 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Quinn, C. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Quinn, Camille R
- ORCID
- Quinn, Camille R
- Venue
- Health & Justice
- Published
- 2015-01-21
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2194-7899 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5151796
- OpenAlex
- W2113492696
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 9.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health & Justice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
- Keywords
- vulnerable populations, secondary data sources, government data access, juvenile probation, juvenile justice, research ethics, lessons learned, research with vulnerable populations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
