Cited by 26Work-Family Balance ChallengesLabor Law and Work DynamicsCOVID-19 and Mental Health

‘In the office nine to five, five days a week... those days are gone’: qualitative exploration of diplomatic personnel’s experiences of remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
Brooks, Samantha K., Hall, Charlotte E., Patel, Dipti, Greenberg, Neil·2022·BMC Psychology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many employees had to work remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic. Literature suggests there are both challenges and benefits to remote working and that remote working can have detrimental effects on mental health. This study aimed to explore diplomatic personnel's perceptions and experiences of working from home during the pandemic. METHODS: Twenty-five employees of the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office took part in semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was carried out to extract recurring themes from the data. RESULTS: Seven main themes emerged from the data: impact of the pandemic on work; relationships with colleagues; benefits of working from home; challenges of working from home; family; moving posts during the pandemic; and perceptions and predictions of post-pandemic work. Participants provided mixed views on how remote working had affected productivity and relationships with colleagues. Benefits of working from home included greater freedom and flexibility; new opportunities; and inclusivity of remote meetings. Challenges included being in different time zones to the countries they were working for; unsuitable home ergonomics; technological issues; and difficulties finding appropriate work-life balance. Those with young children reported difficulties juggling work and childcare. Adjusting to new posts at a time when staff were working remotely appeared particularly challenging. However, most did not want or expect to return to entirely office-based work. They predicted a hybrid model of working in the future, involving both office work and remote work; they stressed the importance of flexibility and suggested there would not be a one-size-fits-all approach to returning to face-to-face work. CONCLUSIONS: Remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic has changed the ways in which employees work, showing them that they do not have to be in the office to successfully achieve their work goals and leaving many wanting flexibility to make their own decisions about working from home (or not). There are both benefits and challenges to remote working; managers can take steps to reduce some of the challenges by being available to support their employees, organising regular remote meetings and allowing employees autonomy in terms of when and where they work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40359-022-00970-x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brooks, S. K., Hall, C. E., Patel, D., & Greenberg, N.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • UK Health Security Agency (GB)
  • Foreign and Commonwealth Office (GB)
Corresponding author
Brooks, Samantha K.
Venue
BMC Psychology
Published
2022-11-17
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
272-272
ISSN
2050-7283 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4309512513
Cited by
26
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6
FWCI
6.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response (NIHR200890)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Labor Law and Work Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
remote work, COVID-19 pandemic, diplomats, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, work-life balance, work flexibility, hybrid work, time zone differences, labor productivity, employee mental health, workplace relationships
MeSH terms
Teleworking, COVID-19, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Mental Health, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review