Cited by 75Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesT-cell and B-cell Immunology

Safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1 in patients with baseline cardiac, renal, or hepatic dysfunction

Open access
Kanz, Bridgette A., Pollack, Megan H., Johnpulle, Romany, Puzanov, Igor, Horn, Leora, Morgans, Alicia, Sosman, Jeffrey A., Rapisuwon, Suthee +3 more·2016·Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anti-PD-1 therapy is increasingly used in various advanced malignancies. Patients with baseline organ dysfunction are largely excluded from clinical trials. Therefore it is unclear whether anti-PD-1 therapy is safe or effective in this setting. Further, these patients are often not candidates for other anti-cancer therapies, highlighting their need for active treatment options. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients from multiple centers with advanced solid tumors and baseline organ dysfunction who received anti-PD-1 therapy. Organ dysfunction was defined as cardiac (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45 %), renal (creatinine ≥2 mg/dL or GFR ≤30 ml/min) or hepatic dysfunction (evidence of cirrhosis on imaging or AST, ALT or bilirubin ≥3x ULN). We assessed change in organ dysfunction, immune related adverse events (irAEs), response rate, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: = 17), hepatic dysfunction (7), cardiac dysfunction (11), including >1 organ dysfunction (8). Worsening organ dysfunction requiring hospitalization or dose delays occurred in 8 patients (30 %) although in most cases this was thought not-drug related and resolved with supportive care. Grade 3 irAEs occurred in 2 pts (7 %; hepatitis and colitis). Thirteen of 27 patients had ongoing treatment benefit (objective response or stable disease) at data collection (48 %). Eleven patients had primary progressive disease (41 %), 11 had stable disease (41 %), 4 had partial responses (15 %), and one had a complete response (4 %). Overall, median PFS was 168 days. Median OS was not reached. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, anti-PD-1 agents in this group of patients with cardiac, hepatic or renal dysfunction were associated with tolerable irAEs and infrequent manageable worsening of organ dysfunction. Further, objective responses and prolonged PFS were observed in a number of patients. Thus, patients with baseline organ dysfunction may be considered for anti-PD-1 therapy with appropriate clinical monitoring.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40425-016-0166-5

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies suggest thyroid dysfunction is associated with improved overall cancer survival, though the mechanism is not well understood.

    “Several studies have suggested that thyroid dysfunction is associated with improved overall survival from a cancer standpoint, although the mechanism for this type of association is not well understood.39,40”

    From Endocrine toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors (2021) · cites this paper as [40]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kanz, B. A., Pollack, M. H., Johnpulle, R., Puzanov, I., Horn, L., Morgans, A., Sosman, J. A., Rapisuwon, S., Conry, R. M., Eroglu, Z., & Johnson, D. B.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Douglas B.
Venue
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-10-18
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
60-60
ISSN
2051-1426 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2522875140
Cited by
75
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (K23CA204726, K12CA090625)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
anti-PD-1 therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, cardiac dysfunction, renal dysfunction, liver dysfunction, immune-related adverse events, advanced solid tumors, treatment safety, treatment efficacy, progression-free survival, overall survival
MeSH terms
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Heart, Heart Function Tests, Humans, Kidney, Kidney Function Tests, Liver, Liver Function Tests, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor, Cardiotoxicity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review