Cited by 258Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Disease-related microglia heterogeneity in the hippocampus of Alzheimer’s disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and hippocampal sclerosis of aging

Open access
Bachstetter, Adam D., Van Eldik, Linda J., Schmitt, Frederick A., Neltner, Janna H., Ighodaro, Eseosa T., Webster, Scott J., Patel, Ela, Abner, Erin L. +2 more·2015·Acta Neuropathologica Communications

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Neuropathological, genetic, and biochemical studies have provided support for the hypothesis that microglia participate in Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis. Despite the extensive characterization of AD microglia, there are still many unanswered questions, and little is known about microglial morphology in other common forms of age-related dementia: particularly, dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and hippocampal sclerosis of aging (HS-Aging). In addition, no prior studies have attempted to compare and contrast the microglia morphology in the hippocampus of various neurodegenerative conditions. RESULTS: Here we studied cases with pathologically-confirmed AD (n = 7), HS-Aging (n = 7), AD + HS-aging (n = 4), DLB (n = 12), and normal (cognitively intact) controls (NC) (n = 9) from the University of Kentucky Alzheimer's Disease Center autopsy cohort. We defined five microglia morphological phenotypes in the autopsy samples: ramified, hypertrophic, dystrophic, rod-shaped, and amoeboid. The Aperio ScanScope digital neuropathological tool was used along with two well-known microglial markers: IBA1 (a marker for both resting and activated microglia) and CD68 (a lysosomal marker in macrophages/microglia associated with phagocytic cells). Hippocampal staining analyses included studies of subregions within the hippocampal formation and nearby white matter. Using these tools and methods, we describe variation in microglial characteristics that show some degree of disease specificity, including, (1) increased microglia density and number in HS-aging and AD + HS-aging; (2) low microglia density in DLB; (3) increased number of dystrophic microglia in HS-aging; and (4) increased proportion of dystrophic to all microglia in DLB. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that variations in morphologies among microglial cells, and cells of macrophage lineage, can help guide future work connecting neuroinflammatory mechanisms with specific neurodegenerative disease subtypes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40478-015-0209-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the hippocampus, six of eight studies identified higher CD68 in Alzheimer's disease and two identified no differences.

    “CD68-positive cell counts, staining area or gene expression were measured in the hippocampus in eight studies: six identified higher levels in AD20, 69, 76, 78, 79, 86 and two identified no differences.69, 87”

    From Markers of microglia in post-mortem brain samples from patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review (2018) · cites this paper as [69]

    The Results section (page unavailable) reports higher CD68 staining in AD than in controls when averaged across hippocampal subregions, supporting this paper’s inclusion among studies finding higher levels. It also reports no significant disease-status effect in some individual regions, but not an overall absence of difference; this paper alone does not establish the six-of-eight and two-of-eight study counts. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Bachstetter et al. counted CD68-positive microglia in the hippocampus CA1, CA2/3, CA4 and the dentate gyrus, and noted increases in the CA1 and dentate gyrus relative to controls, but no difference in CA2/3 or CA4.

    “For example, Bachstetter et al.69 counted CD68-positive microglia in the hippocampus CA1, CA2/3, CA4 and the dentate gyrus, and noted increases in the CA1 and dentate gyrus relative to controls, but no difference in CA2/3 or CA4.”

    From Markers of microglia in post-mortem brain samples from patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review (2018) · cites this paper as [69]

    The Results section (page unavailable) reports more CD68-positive staining in CA1 for HS-aging, AD, and AD plus HS-aging than in normal controls, and more staining in the dentate gyrus for AD than in the other groups; it found no significant disease-status effect in CA2/3 or CA4. Those regional comparisons come from staining-positive pixel measurements. The paper also counted large round CD68-positive cells, but the claim conflates those cell counts with the staining results and omits which disease groups showed the increases. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Four studies reported no difference in CD68 in at least one of the brain regions measured.

    “and four reported no difference in at least one of the brain regions measured.20, 41, 69, 80”
  • Ten studies identified no difference in Iba1 from controls.

    “whereas 10 studies identified no difference from controls32, 54, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76”
  • iMGLs express other CNS disease-related genes including APP, PSEN1/2, HTT, GRN, TARDBP, LRRK2, C9orf72, SOD1, VCP, and FUS.

    “In addition to AD GWAS genes, iMGLs express other CNS disease-related genes including APP, PSEN1/2, HTT, GRN, TARDBP, LRRK2, C9orf72, SOD1, VCP, and FUS and therefore, can likely be used to study other neurological diseases such as ALS, HD, FTD, and DLB in which microglia may play a prominent role (Bachstetter et al., 2015; Crotti et al., 2014; Lui et al., 2016; O’Rourke et al., 2016)(Figure S6C).”

    From iPSC-derived human microglia-like cells to study neurological diseases (2017) · cites this paper as Bachstetter et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 258

Authors
Bachstetter, A. D., Van Eldik, L. J., Schmitt, F. A., Neltner, J. H., Ighodaro, E. T., Webster, S. J., Patel, E., Abner, E. L., Kryscio, R. J., & Nelson, P. T.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Bachstetter, Adam D.
Venue
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
Published
2015-05-23
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
32-32
ISSN
2051-5960 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138650666
Cited by
258
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2
FWCI
10.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Neuropathologica Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (K99 AG044445)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
hippocampus, Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, microglial morphology, microglial activation, Iba1, CD68, neuroinflammation, age-related dementia, macrophages
MeSH terms
CD68 Molecule, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Autopsy, Calcium-Binding Proteins, Dementia, DNA-Binding Proteins, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Microfilament Proteins, Sclerosis, Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic, Antigens, CD, Microglia, Lewy Body Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review