Cited by 116Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesCommunity Development and Social ImpactInnovation, Technology, and Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social entrepreneurship: the need, relevance, facets and constraints

Open access
Gandhi, Tanvi, Raina, Rishav·2018·Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research

Abstract

Social entrepreneurship is gradually becoming a crucial element in the worldwide discussion on volunteerism and civic commitment. It interleaves the passion of a common cause with industrial ethics and is notable and different from the present other types of entrepreneurship models due to its quest for mission associated influence. The previous few years have noticed a striking and surprising progress in the field of social entrepreneurship and has amplified attention ranging throughout all the diverse sectors. The critical difference between social and traditional entrepreneurship can be seen in the founding mission of the venture and the market impressions. Social entrepreneurs emphasize on ways to relieve or eradicate societal pressures and produce progressive externalities or public properties. This study focuses mainly on the meaning of social entrepreneurship to different genres and where does it stand in respect to other forms of entrepreneurship in today’s times.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40497-018-0094-6

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 4
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 5
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wolfgang, G. (2012). Business models of social enterprise: A design approach to hybridity. ACRN Journal of entrepreneurship Perspectives, 1(1), 37–60.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 116

Metadata

Authors
Gandhi, T., & Raina, R.
Affiliations
Jaypee Institute of Information Technology (IN)
Corresponding author
Gandhi, Tanvi
Venue
Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research
Published
2018-04-13
Volume
8
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2228-7566 (ISSN-L)
  • 2251-7316
OpenAlex
W2800401319
Cited by
115
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9
FWCI
18.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of global entrepreneurship research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Community Development and Social Impact
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
Keywords
social entrepreneurship, volunteering, civic commitment, industrial ethics, social impact, externalities, public goods, traditional entrepreneurship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review