The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maxillary molar distalization with aligners in adult patients: a multicenter retrospective study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that bodily maxillary molar distalization was not achievable in aligner orthodontics. METHODS: Forty lateral cephalograms obtained from 20 non-growing subjects (9 male, 11 female; average age 29.73 years) (group S), who underwent bilateral distalization of their maxillary dentition with Invisalign aligners (Align Technology, Inc., San José, CA, USA), were considered for the study. Skeletal class I or class II malocclusion and a bilateral end-to-end class II molar relationship were the main inclusion criteria. Cephalograms were taken at two time points: (T0) pretreatment and (T2) post-treatment. Treatment changes were evaluated between the time points using 39 variables by means of paired t test. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Reproducibility of measurements was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The mean treatment time was 24.3 ± 4.2 months. At the post-treatment point, the first molar moved distally 2.25 mm without significant tipping (P = 0.27) and vertical movements (P = 0.43). The second molar distalization was 2.52 mm without significant tipping (P = 0.056) and vertical movements (P = 0.25). No significant movements were detected on the lower arch. SN^GoGn and SPP^GoGn angles showed no significant differences between pre- and post-treatment cephalograms (P = 0.22 and P = 0.85, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Aligner therapy in association with composite attachments and class II elastics can distalize maxillary first molars by 2.25 mm without significant tipping and vertical movements of the crown. No changes to the facial height were revealed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schiffman, E., Ohrbach, R., Truelove, E., Look, J., Anderson, G., Goulet, J.-P., List, T., Svensson, P., Gonzalez, Y., Lobbezoo, F., et al. (2014) · Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache · doi:10.11607/jop.1151 · Cited by 4,567 · cited 1×
“The exclusion criteria were (1) transversal dental or skeletal discrepancies, (2) vertical dental or skeletal discrepancies, (3) extraction treatment (except for third molars), (4) unilateral distalization, (5) signs and/or symptoms of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) accordingly to Diagnostic Criteria for TMDs [17]…”
Background
Cited by
Clinical effectiveness of Invisalign® orthodontic treatment: a systematic review
Papadimitriou, A., Mousoulea, S., Gkantidis, N., & Kloukos, D. (2018) · Progress in Orthodontics · doi:10.1186/s40510-018-0235-z · Cited by 366
Clear Aligners: Where are we today? A narrative review
Shashidhar, K., Kanwal, B., Kuttappa, M., Krishna Nayak, U., Shetty, A., & Mathew, K. (2022) · Journal of International Oral Health · doi:10.4103/jioh.jioh_334_21 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Ravera, S., Castroflorio, T., Garino, F., Daher, S., Cugliari, G., & Deregibus, A.
- Venue
- Progress in Orthodontics
- Published
- 2016-04-18
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12-12
- ISSN
- 1723-7785 (ISSN-L)
- 2196-1042
- OpenAlex
- W2327891393
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maxillary molar distalization with aligners in adult patients: a multicenter retrospective study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40510-016-0126-0
- The paper
- Ravera, S., Castroflorio, T., Garino, F., Daher, S., Cugliari, G., & Deregibus, A. (2016). Maxillary molar distalization with aligners in adult patients: a multicenter retrospective study. Progress in Orthodontics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0126-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.