Cited by 137CO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsGeothermal Energy Systems and ApplicationsThermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems

The potential of coupled carbon storage and geothermal extraction in a CO2-enhanced geothermal system: a review

Open access
Wu, Yu, Li, Pan·2020·Geothermal Energy

Abstract

Abstract The increasing demand for energy makes it difficult to replace fossil fuels with low-carbon energy sources in the short term, and the large amount of CO2 emitted by fossil fuel combustion increases global warming. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies for reducing CO2 emissions in power plants and industrial processes have been developed. High costs and security issues limit industrial applications of these technologies, so an alternative for carbon reduction is needed, i.e., CO2 as a working fluid for coupled carbon storage and geothermal extraction in an Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS). We describe the status of global carbon emissions, CCS technologies, and their challenges. The characteristics of CO2 as a working fluid are compared from thermophysical and thermodynamic perspectives, and the solubility of CO2 in reservoir fluids with different ionic strengths, pressures, and temperatures is analyzed. The influence of artificial stimulation on the permeability of an EGS reservoir is described. Through heat extraction experiment of water alternating supercritical CO2 (SCCO2) cycle injection, the effects of CO2–fluid–rock interactions on the reservoir’s structure and of mineral dissolution and precipitation on geological CO2 storage are analyzed. We summarize the application prospects for this alternative and the challenges of future application.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40517-020-00173-w

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Geothermal energy is non-carbon-based heat energy contained in the interior of the Earth, with advantages of stability, continuity, and high capacity.

    “Geothermal energy is non-carbon-based heat energy contained in the interior of the Earth, with the advantages of stability, continuity, and high capacity.85”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 114 · Cited by 137

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Bains P, Psarras P, Wilcox J. CO2 capture from the industry sector. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2017;63:146–72.
  2. Brehme M, Blöcher G, Regenspurg S, Milsch H, Petrauskas S, Valickas R, Wolfgramm M, Huenges E. Approach to develop a soft stimulation concept to overcome formation damage—a case study at Klaipeda, Lithuania. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2017.
  3. Brown DW. A hot dry rock geothermal energy concept utilizing supercritical co2 instead of water. In: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering. 2000.
  4. Jiang JN, Wang WT, Wang C, Liu YH. Addressing climate change demands to build a global technological cooperation system based on the ecological civilization philosophy. China Popul Resour Environ. 2017;27:57–64.
  5. Kaieda H, Ueda A, Kubota K, Wakahama H, Mito S, Sugiyama K, Ozawa A, Kuroda Y, Sato H, Yajima T, Kato K, Ito H, Ohsumi T, Kaji Y, Tokumaru T. Field experiments for studying on CO2 sequestration in solid minerals at the Ogachi HDR Geothermal Site, Japan. In: Proceedings of thirty-fourth workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering. 2009.
  6. Li DW, Wang YX. Major Issues of Research and Development of Hot Dry Rock Geothermal Energy. Earth Sci. 2015;40:1858–69.
  7. Lu C, Wang G. Current status and prospect of hot dry rock research. Sci Technol Rev. 2015;33:13–21.
  8. McGrail BP, Schaef HT, Spane FA, Cliff JB, Qafoku O, Horner JA, Thompson CJ, Owen AT, Sullivan CE. Field validation of supercritical CO2 reactivity with basalts. Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2017;4:6–10.
  9. Nami P, Schellschmidt R, Schindler M, Tischner T. Chemical stimulation operations for reservoir development of the deep crystalline HDR/EGS system at Soultz-sous-Forêts (France). In: Proceedings of thirty-second workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering. 2008.
  10. Pritchett JW. On the relative effectiveness of H2O and CO2 as reservoir working fluids for EGS heat mining. Trans Geotherm Resour Counc. 2009;33:235–9.
  11. Service RF. Framework materials grab CO2 and researchers’ attention. Science. 2008;319:893.
  12. Wang XX, Wu NY, Su Z, Zeng YC. Development of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS)-With Soultz Geothermal Farm in France Serving as an Example. J Eng Therm Energy Power. 2012b;27:631–6.

Authors
Wu, Y., & Li, P.
Affiliations
China University of Mining and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Pan
Venue
Geothermal Energy
Published
2020-06-15
Volume
8
Issue
1
ISSN
2195-9706 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3035737375
Cited by
137
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geothermal Energy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51674247)
  • the ICET (International Clean Energy Talent) Program from China Scholarship Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Keywords
carbon storage, carbon capture and storage, mineral dissolution and precipitation, CO2 geological storage, CO2 emission reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review