Cited by 8ERP Systems Implementation and ImpactTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourDecision Support System Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Acceptance of homegrown enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems in Ethiopia

Open access
Wagaw, Mekonnen·2017·Applied Informatics

Abstract

In the current competitive global market, organizations are implementing information and communication technology (ICT) that could add value to their products, processes, and satisfaction of their users. The adoption, implementation and use of homegrown enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems is one of these mechanisms being globally used for recording, processing, storing, and exchanging organizational information anytime anywhere. Although organizations have been utilizing ERP systems, the acceptance of homegrown ERP systems is given less attention as compared to commercial off-the shelf (COTS) software. Hence, this research studied factors that determine acceptance of homegrown ERP through the extension of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model. The finding revealed that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, competitive advantage, cost effectiveness, and facilitations functions are determinants of homegrown ERP system acceptance in Ethiopia. Moreover, experience and voluntariness are found to be significant moderators of the study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40535-017-0034-5

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Moghavvemi S, Hakimian F, Feissal T, Faziharudean TM (2012) Competitive advantages through IT innovation adoption by SMEs. Soc Technol 2(1):24–39
  2. Nunnaly JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. New York, MCGraw-Hill
  3. Ramesh HN (2011) Competitive advantage and Employee’s attitude towards IT intervention. Int J Contemp Bus Stud 2(6):42–52

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wagaw, M.
Affiliations
Bahir Dar University (ET)
Corresponding author
Wagaw, Mekonnen
Venue
Applied Informatics
Published
2017-03-14
Volume
4
Issue
1
ISSN
2196-0089 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2601042574
Cited by
8
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Applied Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Bahir Dar University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Decision Support System Applications
Keywords
enterprise resource planning, technology acceptance, UTAUT, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, competitive advantage, cost-effectiveness, commercial off-the-shelf software, Ethiopia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review