Everything in moderation: ICT and reading performance of Dutch 15-year-olds
Open accessAbstract
Previous research on the relationship between students’ home and school Information and Communication Technology (ICT) resources and academic performance has shown ambiguous results. The availability of ICT resources at school has been found to be unrelated or negatively related to academic performance, whereas the availability of ICT resources at home has been found to be both positively and negatively related to academic performance. In addition, the frequency of use of ICT is related to students’ academic achievement. This relationship has been found to be negative for ICT use at school, however, for ICT use at home the literature on the relationship with academic performance is again ambiguous. In addition to ICT availability and ICT use, students’ attitudes towards ICT have also been found to play a role in student performance. In the present study, we examine how availability of ICT resources, students’ use of those resources (at school, outside school for schoolwork, outside school for leisure), and students’ attitudes toward ICT (interest in ICT, perceived ICT competence, perceived ICT autonomy) relate to individual differences in performance on a digital assessment of reading in one comprehensive model using the Dutch PISA 2015 sample of 5183 15-year-olds (49.2% male). Student gender and students’ economic, social, and cultural status accounted for a substantial part of the variation in digitally assessed reading performance. Controlling for these relationships, results indicated that students with moderate access to ICT resources, moderate use of ICT at school or outside school for schoolwork, and moderate interest in ICT had the highest digitally assessed reading performance. In contrast, students who reported moderate competence in ICT had the lowest digitally assessed reading performance. In addition, frequent use of ICT outside school for leisure was negatively related to digitally assessed reading performance, whereas perceived autonomy was positively related. Taken together, the findings suggest that excessive access to ICT resources, excessive use of ICT, and excessive interest in ICT is associated with lower digitally assessed reading performance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Random sampling encompasses a broader and more diverse population, including individuals with varying educational levels and economic backgrounds.
“Random sampling encompasses a broader and more diverse population, including individuals with varying educational levels and economic backgrounds (Gubbels et al. 2020; Leung and Lee, 2012a, 2012b; Sabir and Naureen, 2017)”
From The causal relationship between digital literacy and students’ academic achievement: a meta-analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Gubbels et al. 2020
Cites
Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection
OECD (2015) · PISA · doi:10.1787/9789264239555-en · Cited by 787 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The causal relationship between digital literacy and students’ academic achievement: a meta-analysis
Li, F., Cheng, L., Wang, X., Shen, L., Ma, Y., & Islam, A. Y. M. A. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-04399-6 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“Random sampling encompasses a broader and more diverse population, including individuals with varying educational levels and economic backgrounds (Gubbels et al. 2020; Leung and Lee, 2012a, 2012b; Sabir and Naureen, 2017), which may dilute the correlation between digital literacy and academic…”
- Authors
- Gubbels, J., Swart, N. M., & Groen, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Gubbels, Joyce
- Venue
- Large-scale Assessments in Education
- Published
- 2020-01-30
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2196-0739 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3007047590
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 19.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Large-scale Assessments in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Keywords
- information and communication technologies, reading achievement, ICT availability, ICT use, attitudes toward ICT, ICT competence, perceived autonomy, digital assessment, PISA 2015, 15-year-old students, moderation, socioeconomic status, gender differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review