Cited by 853Education and Technology IntegrationEducational Innovations and TechnologyGender and Technology in Education

Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection

OECD·2015·PISA

Abstract

Are there computers in the classroom? Does it matter? Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection examines how students’ access to and use of information and communication technology (ICT) devices has evolved in recent years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1787/9789264239555-en

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 5 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
OECD
Corresponding author
OECD
Venue
PISA
Publisher
OECD
Published
2015-09-14
ISSN
  • 1990-8539 (ISSN-L)
  • 1996-3777
OpenAlex
W4237634314
Cited by
787
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 106 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
159.72
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Programme for international student assessment/Internationale Schulleistungsstudie (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
information and communication technologies, ICT in education, classroom technology, student technology use, educational technology, academic performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review