The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Boosting methods for multi-class imbalanced data classification: an experimental review
Open accessAbstract
Since canonical machine learning algorithms assume that the dataset has equal number of samples in each class, binary classification became a very challenging task to discriminate the minority class samples efficiently in imbalanced datasets. For this reason, researchers have been paid attention and have proposed many methods to deal with this problem, which can be broadly categorized into data level and algorithm level. Besides, multi-class imbalanced learning is much harder than binary one and is still an open problem. Boosting algorithms are a class of ensemble learning methods in machine learning that improves the performance of separate base learners by combining them into a composite whole. This paper’s aim is to review the most significant published boosting techniques on multi-class imbalanced datasets. A thorough empirical comparison is conducted to analyze the performance of binary and multi-class boosting algorithms on various multi-class imbalanced datasets. In addition, based on the obtained results for performance evaluation metrics and a recently proposed criteria for comparing metrics, the selected metrics are compared to determine a suitable performance metric for multi-class imbalanced datasets. The experimental studies show that the CatBoost and LogitBoost algorithms are superior to other boosting algorithms on multi-class imbalanced conventional and big datasets, respectively. Furthermore, the MMCC is a better evaluation metric than the MAUC and G-mean in multi-class imbalanced data domains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785 · Cited by 54,569
Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine
Friedman, J. H. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013203451 · Cited by 30,731
Advances in neural information processing systems 7
Cios, K., & Shields, M. (1997) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(97)90018-7 · Cited by 22,059
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree
(2017) · HAL · Cited by 10,512
Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2000) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1016218223 · Cited by 6,884
Chicco, D., & Jurman, G. (2020) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7 · Cited by 6,143 · cited 1×
“To have an intuitive view of the performance of the classifier based on these metrics, F-measure [72] can be used.”
MethodSaito, T., & Rehmsmeier, M. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118432 · Cited by 5,309
A study of the behavior of several methods for balancing machine learning training data
Batista, G. E. A. P. A., Prati, R. C., & Monard, M. C. (2004) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1007730.1007735 · Cited by 4,203
Galar, M., Fernandez, A., Barrenechea, E., Bustince, H., & Herrera, F. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2011.2161285 · Cited by 2,794
Cited by
A Survey of Machine Unlearning
Nguyen, T. T., Huynh, T. T., Ren, Z., Nguyen, P. L., Liew, A. W.-C., Yin, H., & Nguyen, Q. V. H. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.02299 · Cited by 193
“However, partitioning data by class itself does not help the model’s training in the first place, as learning the differences between classes is the core of many learning algorithms [146].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Tanha, J., Abdi, Y., Samadi, N., Razzaghi, N., & Asadpour, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Big Data
- Published
- 2020-09-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2196-1115 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3082059448
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 16.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Boosting methods for multi-class imbalanced data classification: an experimental review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40537-020-00349-y
- The paper
- Tanha, J., Abdi, Y., Samadi, N., Razzaghi, N., & Asadpour, M. (2020). Boosting methods for multi-class imbalanced data classification: an experimental review. Journal of Big Data. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-020-00349-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.