Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,794

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Review on Ensembles for the Class Imbalance Problem: Bagging-, Boosting-, and Hybrid-Based Approaches

Galar, M., Fernandez, A., Barrenechea, E., Bustince, H., Herrera, F.·2012·IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews)

Abstract

Classifier learning with data-sets that suffer from imbalanced class distributions is a challenging problem in data mining community. This issue occurs when the number of examples that represent one class is much lower than the ones of the other classes. Its presence in many real-world applications has brought along a growth of attention from researchers. In machine learning, the ensemble of classifiers are known to increase the accuracy of single classifiers by combining several of them, but neither of these learning techniques alone solve the class imbalance problem, to deal with this issue the ensemble learning algorithms have to be designed specifically. In this paper, our aim is to review the state of the art on ensemble techniques in the framework of imbalanced data-sets, with focus on two-class problems. We propose a taxonomy for ensemble-based methods to address the class imbalance where each proposal can be categorized depending on the inner ensemble methodology in which it is based. In addition, we develop a thorough empirical comparison by the consideration of the most significant published approaches, within the families of the taxonomy proposed, to show whether any of them makes a difference. This comparison has shown the good behavior of the simplest approaches which combine random undersampling techniques with bagging or boosting ensembles. In addition, the positive synergy between sampling techniques and bagging has stood out. Furthermore, our results show empirically that ensemble-based algorithms are worthwhile since they outperform the mere use of preprocessing techniques before learning the classifier, therefore justifying the increase of complexity by means of a significant enhancement of the results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsmcc.2011.2161285

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Research works printed but not linked: 96

  1. 10.1016/j.csda.2009.07.017 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.inffus.2004.04.009 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1109/ICNN.1996.548872 · DOI · Paper page
  4. ho, 2002, Hybrid Methods in Pattern Recognition, 171, 10.1142/9789812778147_0007 · DOI
  5. ho, 1994, Decision combination in multiple classifier systems, IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 16, 66, 10.1109/34.273716 · DOI · Paper page
  6. xu, 2011, An efficient tree classifier ensemble-based approach for pedestrian detection, IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern, 41, 107, 10.1109/TSMCB.2010.2046890 · DOI
  7. hu, 2001, Using rough sets theory and database operations to construct a good ensemble of classifiers for data mining applications, Proc IEEE Int Conf Data Mining, 233
  8. 10.1080/095400996116839 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.inffus.2004.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
  10. krogh, 1995, Neural network ensembles, cross validation, and active learning, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 7, 231
  11. 10.1109/TSMCC.2009.2038280 · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2009.2038280
  12. 10.1016/j.inffus.2007.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2052608 · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2010.2052608
  14. 10.1145/1007730.1007735 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 2004, Special Issue Learning Imbalanced Datasets SIGKDD Explor Newsl
  16. 10.1007/978-3-540-74553-2_28 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s10618-008-0087-0 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1109/TPAMI.2006.134 · DOI · Paper page
  19. chang, 2003, Statistical learning for effective visual information retrieval, Proc Int Conf Image Process, 3, 609
  20. 10.1109/MCAS.2006.1688199 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.patcog.2007.04.009 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1111/j.0824-7935.2004.t01-1-00228.x · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1109/TKDE.2007.190623 · DOI
  24. quinlan, 1993, C4 5 Programs for Machine Learning
  25. alcal-fdez, 2011, KEEL data-mining software tool: Data set repository, integration of algorithms and experimental analysis framework, J Mult -Valued Log Soft-Comput, 17, 255
  26. 10.1007/s00500-008-0323-y · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1109/CIDM.2009.4938667 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1007/s00500-008-0319-7 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.fss.2007.12.023 · DOI · Paper page
  30. stefanowski, 2008, Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery, 283, 10.1007/978-3-540-85836-2_27 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1007/s10044-007-0087-5 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1007/978-0-387-09823-4_45 · DOI · Paper page
  33. weiss, 2003, Learning when training data are costly: The effect of class distribution on tree induction, J Artif Intell Res, 19, 315, 10.1613/jair.1199 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1142/S0219622006002258 · DOI · Paper page
  35. ting, 2000, A comparative study of cost-sensitive boosting algorithms, Proc 17th Int Conf Mach Learning, 983
  36. 10.1109/ICDM.2008.87 · DOI
  37. 10.1109/TSMCC.2009.2021989 · DOI
  38. baszczyski, 2010, Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing (Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series 6086), 148, 10.1007/978-3-642-13529-3_17 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13529-3_17
  39. 10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2029559 · DOI · Paper page
  40. fan, 1999, Adacost: Misclassification cost-sensitive boosting, presented at the 20th Int Conf Mach Learn, 97
  41. liu, 2009, Exploratory undersampling for class-imbalance learning, IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C Appl Rev, 39, 539, 10.1109/TSMCB.2008.2007853 · DOI · Paper page
  42. chawla, 2003, SMOTEBoost: Improving prediction of the minority class in boosting, Knowledge Discovery in Databases, 107
  43. 10.1002/0471660264 · DOI · Paper page
  44. uncu, 2007, Comparison of different strategies of utilizing fuzzy clustering in structure identification, Inf Sci, 177, 5153, 10.1016/j.ins.2007.06.030 · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2007.06.030
  45. 10.1109/GRC.2006.1635905 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2005.04.006 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.01.035 · DOI
  48. liu, 2000, Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 293
  49. 10.1023/A:1012406528296 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2007.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1016/j.neunet.2007.12.051 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/S0031-3203(02)00257-1 · DOI · Paper page
  53. napieraa, 2010, Learning from Imbalanced data in presence of noisy and borderline examples, Proc Rough Sets Curr Trends Comput, 158, 10.1007/978-3-642-13529-3_18 · DOI
  54. 10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2020804 · DOI
  55. 10.1109/IRI.2009.5211614 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.asoc.2009.04.004 · DOI
  57. demar, 2006, Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets, J Mach Learn Res, 7, 1
  58. garca, 2008, An extension on “statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets for all pairwise comparisons, J Mach Learn Res, 9, 2677
  59. 10.1016/j.ins.2009.12.010 · DOI · Paper page
  60. duda, 2001, Pattern Classification
  61. 10.1109/TKDE.2008.239 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1109/LGRS.2009.2021964 · DOI
  63. 10.1142/S0218001409007326 · DOI · Paper page
  64. rudin, 2004, The dynamics of AdaBoost: Cyclic behavior and convergence of margins, J Mach Learn Res, 5, 1557
  65. 10.1007/s00500-008-0392-y · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1023/A:1024099825458 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1023/A:1007563306331 · DOI · Paper page
  68. cieslak, 2008, Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, 241, 10.1007/978-3-540-87479-9_34 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1145/1233341.1233378 · DOI
  70. 10.1023/A:1022899518027 · DOI
  71. yan, 2003, On predicting rare classes with SVM ensembles in scene classification, Proc IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process, 3, 21
  72. 10.1023/A:1009778005914 · DOI · Paper page
  73. chan, 1998, Toward scalable learning with non-uniform class and cost distributions: A case study in credit card fraud detection, Proc 1st Int Conf Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), 164
  74. 10.1002/sam.10061 · DOI · Paper page
  75. holm, 1979, A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, Scand J Stat, 6, 65
  76. 10.2307/2289016 · doi:10.2307/2289016
  77. sheskin, 2006, Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures
  78. 10.1145/1007730.1007736 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1007/s10044-003-0192-z · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1023/A:1007614523901 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1109/ICDM.2001.989527 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.1016/j.cherd.2010.01.005 · DOI
  83. 10.1016/j.patcog.2010.03.006 · DOI
  84. 10.1016/j.neunet.2007.12.031 · DOI · Paper page
  85. 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.146 · DOI
  86. liu, 2005, Total margin-based adaptive fuzzy support vector machines for multiview face recognition, Proc IEEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybern, 2, 1704
  87. 10.1023/A:1007452223027 · DOI · Paper page
  88. 10.1109/WCSE.2009.756 · DOI · Paper page
  89. 10.1007/BF00153762 · DOI
  90. zhang, 2008, A strategy for attributes selection in cost-sensitive decision trees induction, Proc IEEE 8th Int Conf Comput Inf Technol Workshops, 8
  91. 10.1145/502512.502540 · DOI · Paper page
  92. 10.1109/34.667881 · DOI · Paper page
  93. 10.1109/TKDE.2006.131 · DOI
  94. 10.1016/B978-1-55860-377-6.50046-3 · DOI · Paper page
  95. kohavi, 1996, Bias plus variance decomposition for zero-one loss functions, Proc 13th Int Conf Mach Learning
  96. breiman, 1996, Bias variance and arcing classifiers

Cited by

See all 2,794

Metadata

Authors
Galar, M., Fernandez, A., Barrenechea, E., Bustince, H., & Herrera, F.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews)
Published
2012-07
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
463-484
ISSN
  • 1094-6977 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2442
OpenAlex
W2099454382
Cited by
2,794
References
15
FWCI
45.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review on Ensembles for the Class Imbalance Problem: Bagging-, Boosting-, and Hybrid-Based Approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsmcc.2011.2161285
The paper
Galar, M., Fernandez, A., Barrenechea, E., Bustince, H., & Herrera, F. (2012). A Review on Ensembles for the Class Imbalance Problem: Bagging-, Boosting-, and Hybrid-Based Approaches. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews). https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmcc.2011.2161285

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.