Cited by 36Respiratory Support and MechanismsHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapySepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Thoracic fluid content: A novel parameter for predicting failed weaning from mechanical ventilation

Open access
Fathy, Shymaa, Hasanin, Ahmed M., Raafat, Mohamed, Mostafa, Maha M. A., Fetouh, Ahmed M., Elsayed, Mohamed, Badr, Esraa M., Kamal, Hanan M. +1 more·2020·Journal of Intensive Care

Abstract

Abstract Background Weaning of patients from the mechanical ventilation remains one of the critical decisions in intensive care unit. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of thoracic fluid content (TFC) as a predictor of weaning outcome. Methods An observational cohort study included 64 critically ill surgical patients who were eligible for extubation. Before initiating the spontaneous breathing trial, the TFC was measured using the electrical cardiometry technology. Patients were followed up after extubation and divided into successful weaning group and failed weaning group. Both groups were compared according to respiratory and cardiovascular parameters. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to evaluate the ability of TFC to predict weaning outcome. Results The number of successfully weaned patients was 41/64 (64%). Twenty (31%) patients had impaired cardiac contractility, and of them, 13/20 (64%) patients were successfully extubated. Both groups, successful weaning group and failed weaning group, were comparable in most of baseline characteristics; however, the TFC was significantly higher in the failed weaning group compared to the successful weaning group. The area under the ROC curves (AUCs) showed moderate predictive ability for the TFC in predicting weaning failure (AUC [95% confidence interval] 0.69 [0.57–0.8], cutoff value > 50 kΩ−1), while the predictive ability of TFC was excellent in the subgroup of patients with ejection fraction < 40% (AUC [95% confidence interval 0.93 [0.72–1], cutoff value > 50 kΩ−1). Conclusions Thoracic fluid content showed moderate ability for predicting weaning outcome in surgical critically ill patients. However, in the subgroup of patients with ejection fraction less than 40%, TFC above 50 kΩ−1 has an excellent ability to predict weaning failure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40560-020-00439-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Thoracic fluid content measured by electrical cardiometry detects pulmonary congestion.

    “detecting pulmonary congestion [78]”

    From Trends and Challenges in Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring of Neonates Following Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review (2025) · cites this paper as [78]

    The Methods say TFC was measured by electrical cardiometry, and the Discussion says a high TFC value could be an indirect measure of lung congestion and/or hypervolemia. The claim overstates this qualified interpretation as detection of pulmonary congestion. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 36

Authors
Fathy, S., Hasanin, A. M., Raafat, M., Mostafa, M. M. A., Fetouh, A. M., Elsayed, M., Badr, E. M., Kamal, H. M., & Fouad, A. Z.
Affiliations
Cairo University (EG)
Corresponding author
Hasanin, Ahmed M.
Venue
Journal of Intensive Care
Published
2020-03-05
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
20-20
ISSN
2052-0492 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3011591963
Cited by
36
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Intensive Care (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
thoracic fluid content, weaning from mechanical ventilation, electrical cardiometry, spontaneous breathing trial, cardiac contractility, ejection fraction, critically ill surgical patients, extubation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review