The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engagement detection in online learning: a review
Open accessAbstract
Online learners participate in various educational activities including reading, writing, watching video tutorials, online exams, and online meetings. During the participation in these educational activities, they show various engagement levels, such as boredom, frustration, delight, neutral, confusion, and learning gain. To provide personalized pedagogical support through interventions to online learners, it is important for online educators to detect their online learners’ engagement status precisely and efficiently. This paper presents a review of the state of the art in engagement detection in the context of online learning. We classify the existing methods into three main categories— automatic, semi-automatic and manual —considering the methods’ dependencies on learners’ participation. Methods in each category are then divided into subcategories based on the data types (e.g., audio, video, texts for learner log data etc.) they process for the engagement detection. In particular, the computer vision based methods in the automatic category that use facial expressions are examined in more details because they are found to be promising in the online learning environment. These methods are nonintrusive in nature, and the hardware and the software that these methods use to capture and analyze video data are cost-effective and easily achievable. Different techniques in the field of computer vision and machine learning are applied in these methods for the engagement detection. We then identify their challenges of engagement detection and explore available datasets and performance metrics for engagement detection, and provide recommendations for the future to advance the technology of engagement detection for online education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (2019) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t27734-000 · Cited by 6,019
Handbook of Research on Student Engagement
(2012) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7 · Cited by 3,050
Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003) · School Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860 · Cited by 1,237
Thermistor at a Distance: Unobtrusive Measurement of Breathing
Fei, J., & Pavlidis, I. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2009.2032415 · Cited by 201
Automatic Detection of Learning-Centered Affective States in the Wild
Bosch, N., D'Mello, S., Baker, R., Ocumpaugh, J., Shute, V., Ventura, M., Wang, L., & Zhao, W. (2015) · Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/2678025.2701397 · Cited by 178
Cited by
Facial recognition technology in schools: critical questions and concerns
Andrejevic, M., & Selwyn, N. (2020) · Learning, Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2020.1686014 · Cited by 284
Machine Learning for Human Learners: Opportunities, Issues, Tensions and Threats
Webb, M. E., Fluck, A., Magenheim, J., Malyn-Smith, J., Waters, J., Deschênes, M., & Zagami, J. (2021) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09858-2 · Cited by 116
Mehta, N. K., Prasad, S. S., Saurav, S., Saini, R., & Singh, S. (2022) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-022-03200-4 · Cited by 97
Personalisation methods in e-learning-A literature review
Mikić, V., Ilić, M., Kopanja, L., & Vesin, B. (2022) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22566 · Cited by 39
König, A., Zeghari, R., Guerchouche, R., Duc Tran, M., Bremond, F., Linz, N., Lindsay, H., Langel, K., Ramakers, I., Lemoine, P., et al. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047083 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Dewan, M. A. A., Murshed, M., & Lin, F.
- Venue
- Smart Learning Environments
- Published
- 2019-01-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2196-7091 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2919890647
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 36.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engagement detection in online learning: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40561-018-0080-z
- The paper
- Dewan, M. A. A., Murshed, M., & Lin, F. (2019). Engagement detection in online learning: a review. Smart Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-018-0080-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.