Cited by 8Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningOpen Education and E-LearningAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Reuse of e-learning personalization components

Open access
Ghallabi, Sameh, Essalmi, Fathi, Jemni, Mohamed, Kinshuk·2022·Smart Learning Environments

Abstract

Personalized learning systems use several components in order to create courses adapted to the learners’characteristics. Current emphasis on the reduction of costs of development of new resources has motivated the reuse of the e-learning personalization components in the creation of new components. Several systems have been proposed in the literature. Each system implements a specific approach and includes a set of software components. However, many of these components are not easily reusable. This paper proposes an architecture, which aims to improve the representation of learning components in a reusable and interoperable way. As a result, these components could be integrated easily for the creation of personalized learning courses. This architecture consists of five main packages: learner model, adaptation model, reuse facilities, learner interface and pedagogical knowledge. An experiment is conducted to validate the proposed architecture. The obtained results illustrate the optimal composition of e-learning personalization components through an example.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40561-022-00214-w

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 8

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Ahmed, M. U., Sangi, N. A., & Mahmood, A. (2017). A learner model for adaptable e-learning. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 8, 139–147.
  2. Aljohany, D. A., Salama, R. M., & Saleh, M. (2018). ASSA: Adaptive E-learning smart students assessment model. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 9, 128–136. · DOI
  3. Chookaew, S., Panjaburee, P., & Wanichsan, D. (2014). A personalized elearning environment to promote students’ conceptual learning on basic computer programming. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 815–819. · DOI
  4. Dominic, M., & Francis, S. (2015). An adaptable E-learning architecture based on learners’ profiling. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 3, 26–31. · DOI
  5. Essalmi, F., Jemni Ben Ayed, L., Jemni, M., & Kinshuk,. (2015). Generalized metrics for the analysis of E-learning personalization strategies Science Direct. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 310–322. · DOI
  6. Essalmi, F., Jemni Ben Ayed, L., Jemni, M., & Kinshuk Graf S. (2010). A fully personalization strategy of E-learning scenarios. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 581–591. · DOI
  7. Gee, B. M., & Strickland, J. (2014). The role of reusable learning objects in occupational therapy entry-level education. Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2, 1–15.
  8. Gutiérrez, I., Álvarez, V., Paule, M. P., Pérez-Pérez, J. R., & de Freitas, S. (2016). Adaptation in E-learning content specifications with dynamic sharable objects. International Journal of Adaptive Educational Technology Systems, 4, 1–11.
  9. Mehlhorn, K., Näher, S., & Sanders, P. (2017). Engineering DFS-based graph algorithms. Computer Science, Data Structures and Algorithms, 1, 1–6.
  10. Paramythis, A., & Loidl-Reisinger, S. (2004). Adaptive learning environments and e-learning standards. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 2, 181–194.
  11. Potdar, G. P., & Thool, R. C. (2014). Comparison of various heuristics search techniques for finding shortest path. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 5, 63–74. · DOI
  12. Rahadian, R. B., & Budiningsih, C. A. (2017). What are the suitable instructional strategy and media for student learning styles in middle schools? International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education (IJITE), 6, 25–39. · DOI
  13. Virvou, M., & Troussas, C. (2011). Personalized Teaching of Multiple Languages through the Web. International Journal for e-Learning Security (IJeLS), 1, 52–59. · DOI
  14. Yarandi, M., Jahankhani, H., & Tawil, A.-R.H. (2013). A personalized adaptive e-learning approach based on semantic web technology. Webology, 10, 1–14.
  15. Wu, Ch. H., Chen, YSh., & Chen, TCh. (2017). An adaptive e-learning system for enhancing learning performance: Based on dynamic scaffolding theory. International Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14, 903–913.
  16. Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia, user modeling and user adapted interaction Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands, 87–110. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Elbeh, H., & Biundo, S. (2012). A personalized course generation system based on task-centered instruction strategy. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ICAI).
  18. Ghallabi, S., Essalmi, F., Jemni, M. & Kinshuk, (2013). Toward the reuse of E-learning personalization systems. International Conference on Information and Communication Technology and Accessibility, 24– 26. · DOI
  19. Karavolos, D., Liapis, A. & Yannakakis, G. (2017).Learning the patterns of balance in a multi-player shooter game. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, 70. · DOI
  20. Khamis, M. A. (2015). Adaptive e-learning environment systems and technologies. In The First International Conference of the Faculty of Education.
  21. Siddique, A., Durrani, Q. S., & Naqvi, H. A. (2018). Developing Adaptive E-Learning Environment Using Cognitive and No cognitive Parameters. Journal of Educational Computing Research. · DOI
  22. Taniguchi, T., Sakaki, S., Shigenaka, R., Tsuboshita, Y., & Ohkuma, T. (2015). A weighted combination of text and image classifiers for user gender inference. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Vision and Language (pp. 87–93). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Ghallabi, S., Essalmi, F., Jemni, M., & Kinshuk
Affiliations
  • Tunis University (TN)
  • University of Jeddah (SA)
Corresponding author
Ghallabi, Sameh
Venue
Smart Learning Environments
Published
2022-11-24
Volume
9
Issue
1
ISSN
2196-7091 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4309941226
Cited by
8
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Smart Learning Environments (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Open Education and E-Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Keywords
personalized e-learning, software component reuse, personalized learning systems, software architecture, interoperability, student model, adaptation model, pedagogical knowledge, course adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reuse of e-learning personalization components. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40561-022-00214-w
The paper
Ghallabi, S., Essalmi, F., Jemni, M., & Kinshuk. (2022). Reuse of e-learning personalization components. Smart Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00214-w