Cited by 20Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMedication Adherence and ComplianceTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology

Promoting adherence to treatment for latent TB infection through mobile phone text messaging: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

Open access
Oren, Eyal, Bell, Melanie L., Garcia, Francisco, Perez-Velez, Carlos, Gerald, Lynn B.·2017·Pilot and Feasibility Studies

Abstract

BACKGROUND: (LTBI). Patient adherence to LTBI treatment is currently poor given that individuals show no symptoms of illness and may not feel that they are at risk of developing active tuberculosis (TB). Short text messages can serve as a simple reminder to take medications and address barriers to adherence such as forgetfulness and lack of social support. METHODS/DESIGN: We aim to determine the feasibility and acceptability of text reminders for improving adherence in latent TB patients using a randomized controlled single-blinded trial, measuring adherence through an increase in treatment completion rates. Forty adult LTBI participants will be randomized to either text messages plus phone call reminders or phone call reminders only (usual care). Recruitment, retention, and study acceptability will be assessed as primary outcomes. DISCUSSION: This pilot study will examine the feasibility of using text messaging for increasing adherence to treatment for latent tuberculosis infection. The study will allow for evaluation of process measures and challenges and development of a model for scaling up an effectiveness trial for increasing treatment adherence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02690818 (Clinical Trials.gov).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40814-017-0128-9

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oren, E., Bell, M. L., Garcia, F., Perez-Velez, C., & Gerald, L. B.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Oren, Eyal
Venue
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Published
2017-03-13
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
15-15
ISSN
2055-5784 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2593186258
Cited by
20
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Pilot and Feasibility Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Lung Association (Social Behavioral Research Grant)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Keywords
latent tuberculosis infection, medication adherence, SMS reminders, mobile phone reminders, phone call reminders, treatment completion, feasibility and acceptability, participant recruitment and retention, social support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review