The DOI matches its Crossref record; 175 of the 175 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Senses of place: architectural design for the multisensory mind
Open accessAbstract
Traditionally, architectural practice has been dominated by the eye/sight. In recent decades, though, architects and designers have increasingly started to consider the other senses, namely sound, touch (including proprioception, kinesthesis, and the vestibular sense), smell, and on rare occasions, even taste in their work. As yet, there has been little recognition of the growing understanding of the multisensory nature of the human mind that has emerged from the field of cognitive neuroscience research. This review therefore provides a summary of the role of the human senses in architectural design practice, both when considered individually and, more importantly, when studied collectively. For it is only by recognizing the fundamentally multisensory nature of perception that one can really hope to explain a number of surprising crossmodal environmental or atmospheric interactions, such as between lighting colour and thermal comfort and between sound and the perceived safety of public space. At the same time, however, the contemporary focus on synaesthetic design needs to be reframed in terms of the crossmodal correspondences and multisensory integration, at least if the most is to be made of multisensory interactions and synergies that have been uncovered in recent years. Looking to the future, the hope is that architectural design practice will increasingly incorporate our growing understanding of the human senses, and how they influence one another. Such a multisensory approach will hopefully lead to the development of buildings and urban spaces that do a better job of promoting our social, cognitive, and emotional development, rather than hindering it, as has too often been the case previously.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1982) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203981139 · Cited by 9,841
Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex
Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1 · Cited by 7,783
Fodor, J. A. (1983) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001 · Cited by 7,734
(1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,295
Journal of experimental psychology: Human Perception and performance
(1987) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/0022-460x(87)90423-8 · Cited by 5,411
Cummins, R., & Fodor, J. (1985) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184717 · Cited by 4,791
Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience.
Grantham, C. E., & Tuan, Y.-F. (1978) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2064418 · Cited by 3,729
Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience
Patricios, N. N., & Tuan, Y.-F. (1979) · Leonardo · doi:10.2307/1574234 · Cited by 3,596
Preface: Cerebral Cortex Has Come of Age
Goldman-Rakic, P. S., & Rakic, P. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1-a · Cited by 3,393
Critique of the Power of Judgment
Kant, I. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804656 · Cited by 3,072
Metadata
- Authors
- Spence, C.
- Venue
- Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
- Published
- 2020-09-18
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 46-46
- ISSN
- 2365-7464 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3047122769
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 175
- FWCI
- 33.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Senses of place: architectural design for the multisensory mind. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s41235-020-00243-4
- The paper
- Spence, C. (2020). Senses of place: architectural design for the multisensory mind. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00243-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.