The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A balancing act: a window into online student engagement experiences
Open accessAbstract
This article reports on a qualitative study which explored online student engagement experiences in a higher education institution. There are very few studies providing in-depth perspectives on the engagement experiences of online students. The project adopted a case study approach, following 24 online students over one academic year. The setting for the study was an undergraduate online Humanities programme at Dublin City University. The research question for the study was:What themes are central to online student engagement experiences?Data was collected from participant-generated learning portfolios and semi-structured interviews and analysed following a data-led thematic approach. The five central themes that make up the study’s findings highlight key issues of students’ sense of community, their support networks, balancing study with life, confidence, and their learning approaches. The findings of this study indicate that successful online student engagement was influenced by a number of psychosocial factors such as peer community, an engaging online teacher, and confidence and by structural factors such as lifeload and course design. One limitation of the study is that it is a relatively small, qualitative study, its findings provide insights into how online degrees can support online students to achieve successful and engaging learning experiences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Engagement in online learning environments has a significant impact on course completion and academic success (Farrell & Brunton, 2020).”
From You have a notification: the role of push notifications in shaping students’ engagement, self-regulation and academic procrastination (2025) · cites this paper as Farrell & Brunton, 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Framing student engagement in higher education
Kahu, E. R. (2013) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.598505 · Cited by 2,103
Quarterly Review of Distance Education
Clark, R. E. (2002) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/bf03651763 · Cited by 1,631
Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success
Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197 · Cited by 1,108
Online social networks as formal learning environments: Learner experiences and activities
Veletsianos, G., & Navarrete, C. C. (2012) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1078 · Cited by 267
O’Shea, S., Stone, C., & Delahunty, J. (2015) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.1019970 · Cited by 242
Holder, B. A. (2007) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.08.002 · Cited by 241
Understanding persistence in adult learning
McGivney, V. (2004) · Open Learning The Journal of Open Distance and e-Learning · doi:10.1080/0268051042000177836 · Cited by 215
Delahunty, J., Verenikina, I., & Jones, P. T. (2013) · Technology Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2013.813405 · Cited by 211
Othering in online learning: an examination of social presence, identity, and sense of community
Phirangee, K., & Malec, A. (2017) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2017.1322457 · Cited by 197
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Frey, J. (2015). The importance of learning experience design for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.gettingsmart.com/2015/04/the-importance-of-learning-experience-design-for-higher-education/
- HEA (2012). Part-time and flexible higher education in Ireland. Dublin: HEA Retrieved May 11, 2019, from https://www.dkit.ie/system/files/HEA%20Report%20on%20Lifelong%20Learning%202013.pdf.
- Higher Education Authority. (2016). Developing Talent,Changing Lives. An Evaluation of Springboard+, 2011–16. Retrieved June 13, 2019, from https://hea.ie/resource-year/2019/publications/https://hea.ie/resource-year/2019/publications/
- Higher Education Authority. (2018). Key Facts & Figures: Higher Education 2017/18. Retrieved June 13, 2019, from https://hea.ie/resource-year/2019/publications/https://hea.ie/resource-year/2019/publications/
- Nichols, M. (2011). Intervention for retention through distance education: A comparison study, Project output ed (). New Zealand: Aotearoa: National Centre for Tertiary Teaching Excellence.
- Quality matters (2019) Higher Ed. Standards. Accessed from https://www.qualitymatters.org/qa-resources/rubric-standards/higher-ed-rubric.
- Young, C., & Perović, N. (2018). ABC Learning Design.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Salas‐Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13190 · Cited by 411
“…benefits to students compared to face- to-face instruction on parameters such as learning gains, satisfaction, learning styles and study habits (Farrell & Brunton, 2020; Paulsen & McCormick, 2020), in spite of challenges in the delivery of online instruction and provision of adequate…”
BackgroundHeilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3 · Cited by 381
Cullinan, J., Flannery, D. J., Harold, J., Lyons, S., & Palcic, D. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00262-1 · Cited by 184
Students’ Responses to Emergency Remote Online Teaching Reveal Critical Factors for All Teaching
Jeffery, K. A., & Bauer, C. F. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00736 · Cited by 166
Integrating students’ perspectives about online learning: a hierarchy of factors
Wart, M. V., Ni, A. Y., Medina, P. S., Canelón, J., Kordrostami, M., Zhang, J., & Liu, Y. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-020-00229-8 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Farrell, O., & Brunton, J.
- Affiliations
- Dublin City University (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Farrell, Orna
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
- Published
- 2020-04-29
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2365-9440 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3029595525
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 53.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Dublin City University Open Access Institutional Repository (Dublin City University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
- Keywords
- online student engagement, online learning, higher education, sense of community, peer support networks, student self-confidence, learning methods, course design, psychosocial factors, student portfolios
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
