The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Students' perceptions of using ChatGPT in a physics class as a virtual tutor
Open accessAbstract
The latest development of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), particularly ChatGPT, has drawn the attention of educational researchers and practitioners. We have witnessed many innovative uses of ChatGPT in STEM classrooms. However, studies regarding students’ perceptions of ChatGPT as a virtual tutoring tool in STEM education are rare. The current study investigated undergraduate students’ perceptions of using ChatGPT in a physics class as an assistant tool for addressing physics questions. Specifically, the study examined the accuracy of ChatGPT in answering physics questions, the relationship between students’ ChatGPT trust levels and answer accuracy, and the influence of trust on students’ perceptions of ChatGPT. Our finding indicates that despite the inaccuracy of GenAI in question answering, most students trust its ability to provide correct answers. Trust in GenAI is also associated with students’ perceptions of GenAI. In addition, this study sheds light on students’ misconceptions toward GenAI and provides suggestions for future considerations in AI literacy teaching and research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This underscores the impact of teaching prompt engineering, providing empirical support for calls for this type of instruction in the literature (Ding et al., 2023; Walter, 2024).”
From Artificial Intelligence for Academic Purposes (AIAP): Integrating AI literacy into an EAP module (2025) · cites this paper as Ding et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Trust in these tools can lead to overreliance, discouraging users from exploring alternative perspectives and reducing the variability of ideas, which results in more homogeneous outputs (Ding et al., 2023;Doshi & Hauser, 2024).”
From “ ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.” Epistemic beliefs and metacognitive accuracy in students' integration of ChatGPT content into academic writing (2025) · cites this paper as Ding et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This is consistent with the findings of numerous studies that investigated student use and perceptions of ChatGPT, which found that students appreciated the technology's ability to provide personalized guidance, facilitate understanding of difficult concepts, and assist with writing tasks (Budhiraja et al. 2024;Ding et al. 2023;Li 2023;Mahapatra 2024;Malik et al. 2023;Yan 2023).”
From Fostering AI Literacy in Undergraduates: A ChatGPT Workshop Case Study (2025) · cites this paper as Ding et al. 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Students appreciated Chat-GPT's ability to provide personalized guidance, facilitate understanding of difficult concepts, or assist with writing tasks (Budhiraja et al. 2024;Ding et al. 2023;Li 2023;Mahapatra 2024;Malik et al. 2023;Yan 2023).”
From Fostering AI Literacy in Undergraduates: A ChatGPT Workshop Case Study (2025) · cites this paper as Ding et al. 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Many worried about the reliability and accuracy of ChatGPT's outputs, citing issues such as inaccuracies, inconsistencies, and the inability to handle complex subjects (Amoozadeh et al. 2024;Ding et al. 2023;Malik et al. 2023;Zhao et al. 2024).”
From Fostering AI Literacy in Undergraduates: A ChatGPT Workshop Case Study (2025) · cites this paper as Ding et al. 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For example, Ding et al. (2023) found that higher trust in ChatGPT did not necessarily correspond with receiving more accurate answers but did lead to more positive perceptions and increased usage intentions.”
From Fostering AI Literacy in Undergraduates: A ChatGPT Workshop Case Study (2025) · cites this paper as Ding et al. (2023)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, it could also foster a dependency that might impede the development of HOTS.The ease of accessing information and problemsolving assistance through tools like ChatGPT could discourage students from engaging in thorough thinking or independent problem-solving (Chan & Hu, 2023;Ding et al., 2023).”
From Empowering ChatGPT with Guidance Mechanism in Blended Learning: Effect of Self-Regulated Learning, Higher-Order Thinking Skills, and Knowledge Construction (2024) · cites this paper as Ding et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Prompt engineering is a fundamental skill for eliciting useful responses from GenAI (Ding et al., 2023; Walter, 2024).”
From Artificial Intelligence for Academic Purposes (AIAP): Integrating AI literacy into an EAP module (2025) · cites this paper as Ding et al., 2023
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Without this explicit instruction, students tend to blindly trust GenAI output (Ding et al., 2023).”
From Artificial Intelligence for Academic Purposes (AIAP): Integrating AI literacy into an EAP module (2025) · cites this paper as Ding et al., 2023
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This framework was conceived in response to issues we, as EAP practitioners, were encountering on the ground, such as an increase in AI-related academic misconduct, a lack of understanding from students of how to interact with or prompt these tools effectively (Walter, 2024) and a tendency to blindly trust information output from GenAI (Ding et al., 2023).”
From Artificial Intelligence for Academic Purposes (AIAP): Integrating AI literacy into an EAP module (2025) · cites this paper as Ding et al., 2023
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This fi nding provides empirical evidence for Ding et al. ' s (2023), Farrelly and Baker ' s (2023) and Walter ' s (2024) suggestion that the integration of AI literacy into education should include activities which require students to analyse and assess GenAI output to foster critical thinking skills.”
From Artificial Intelligence for Academic Purposes (AIAP): Integrating AI literacy into an EAP module (2025) · cites this paper as Ding et al. (2023)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, some students also expressed concerns about the reliability and accuracy of ChatGPT's outputs, aligning with findings from other user studies (Amoozadeh et al. 2024;Ding et al. 2023;Malik et al. 2023;Zhao et al. 2024).”
From Fostering AI Literacy in Undergraduates: A ChatGPT Workshop Case Study (2025) · cites this paper as Ding et al. 2023
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In an introductory physics course, Ding et al (2023) found that nearly half of the students trusted ChatGPT's answers to physics problems regardless of their accuracy, with those expressing trust being more likely to report intentions of future ChatGPT use.”
From Scaffold or Crutch? Examining College Students' Use and Views of Generative AI Tools for STEM Education (2025) · cites this paper as Ding et al (2023)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These findings provide preliminary evidence that genAI tools, if not used effectively, can short-circuit students' learning process.”
From Scaffold or Crutch? Examining College Students' Use and Views of Generative AI Tools for STEM Education (2025) · cites this paper as Ding et al (2023)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Discovering Statistics Using SPSS
Field, A. P., & Miles, J. N. V. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 28,269
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
Hanrahan, G. (2008) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420067972-10 · Cited by 8,196
ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., et al. (2023) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/5er8f · Cited by 7,552
ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., et al. (2023) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 · Cited by 7,326 · cited 4×
“GenAI is a subclass of machine learning (ML) algorithms that can learn from text, images, audio, and video to produce new content based on trained data (Kasneci et al., 2023).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOn seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.4.864 · Cited by 4,069 · cited 1×
“One factor contributing to these misconceptions is anthropomorphism, which involves attributing human-like characteristics to AI, such as feelings, mental states, or behavioral characteristics (Airenti, 2015; Epley et al., 2007).”
BackgroundBAİDOO-ANU, D., & OWUSU ANSAH, L. (2023) · Journal of AI · doi:10.61969/jai.1337500 · Cited by 3,939
(2018) · Cited by 3,510
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Bingham, A. J., & Witkowsky, P. (2022). Deductive and inductive approaches to qualitative data analysis. In C. Vanover, P. Mihas, & J. Saldaña (Eds.), Analyzing and interpreting qualitative data: After the interview (pp. 133–146). SAGE Publications.
- Hu, K. (2023). ChatGPT sets record for fastest-growing user base. Reuters.
- Removed for blinded review.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 264
Trocado, A. E. B. D. S., dos Santos, J. M., Saimon, M., & Lavicza, Z. (2025) · International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology · doi:10.46328/ijemst.5074 · Cited by 6
Learning with large language models: beyond prompt engineering
Ding, L., O’Berry, R., Tallent, H., C., S. G. C. G., & Gapud, A. A. (2026) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-026-13924-2 · Cited by 6
Self-citationEnhancing Higher Education Pedagogy with ChatGPT: Leveraging the Power of Generative AI
Sain, Z. H., Baharun, H., & Abdullah, N. B. (2024) · Journal Emerging Technologies in Education · doi:10.70177/jete.v2i3.1189 · Cited by 6
Uso del ChatGPT y el rendimiento académico en estudiantes de una Universidad Privada
Cruz, S. M. C., Arredondo-Zela, S. O., & Grández-Ventura, L. M. (2024) · REVISTA EDUSER · doi:10.18050/eduser.v11n1a3 · Cited by 6
Fostering AI Literacy in Undergraduates: A ChatGPT Workshop Case Study
Archambault, S. G., Murph, N. L., & Ramachandran, S. (2025) · Library Trends · doi:10.1353/lib.2025.a968491 · Cited by 5
Cho, N., Li, H., Zhang, X., & Li, Y. (2025) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-025-10280-7 · Cited by 5
Xia, L., Zhang, L., Shen, K., & Dong, Y. (2026) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2026.2649818 · Cited by 6
Meishar‐Tal, H., & Amzalag, M. (2026) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2026.102246 · Cited by 5
Effects of Generative AI Tools On Students’ Critical Thinking: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis
Sun, X., Liu, C., Li, P., & Cai, Z. (2026) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-026-10180-1 · Cited by 7
Factors influencing faculty decision-making on student use of generative AI in higher education
Dilinika, J. M. S. (2026) · Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education · doi:10.32674/ksb6gv95 · Cited by 5
Mufit, F. (2025) · International Journal of Information and Education Technology · doi:10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.6.2332 · Cited by 5
Innovating engineering education with AI: a case study on ChatGPT 4.0’s role in statics-physics
Navas, G., Navas-Reascos, G., Navas-Reascos, G. E., & Guaño, S. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2539545 · Cited by 5
Aldreabi, H., Alhur, M., Al‐Okaily, M., Qasim, D., Dahdoul, N. K. S., & Shiyyab, F. S. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100456 · Cited by 7
Exploring the Role of Generative AI Awareness in Shaping Student Perceptions
Simon, S., Suresh, S. P., Nithyananda, S., Unnikrishnan, R. K., Suresh, S., & Manayath, D. (2024) · Contributions to finance and accounting · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-67547-8_44 · Cited by 5
AI chatbots in higher education: Comparing expectations to evidence
Thoeni, A., & Fryer, L. K. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101061 · Cited by 4
Coelho, R., Bjune, A. E., Ellingsen, S., Solheim, B. M., Thormodsæter, R. S., Wasson, B., & Cotner, S. H. (2025) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-025-10216-1 · Cited by 4
YANIT, M. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100682 · Cited by 4
Schmid-Meier, C., & Schulz, L. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-93848-1_25 · Cited by 4
Towards a theory of materiality for quality learning and university education leadership
Ellis, R. A., Han, F., Kember, D. R., & Fan, S. (2025) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.70094 · Cited by 4
Oliński, M., & Sieciński, K. (2025) · Youth · doi:10.3390/youth5040106 · Cited by 4
Chatbots in Science Education: A Scoping Review of Early Empirical Evidence
Utrilla, M. C., Paños, E., & Ruíz-Gallardo, J.-R. (2025) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-025-10260-x · Cited by 7
Fashogbon, B. A., Adeleke, R. O., & Olowe, O. A. (2025) · International Journal of Education Leadership Artificial Intelligence Computing Business Life Sciences and Society · doi:10.65222/viral.2025.9.10 · Cited by 4
Synthetic relationships with Social Pedagogical Agents in education: a scoping literature review
Nouwen, S., Sturm, J., Matzat, U., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1625438 · Cited by 4
Generative AI in Physics Education: A PRISMA-Guided Systematic Review of Empirical Studies
Moundridou, M., Moutis, N., Charalampopoulos, K., & Matzakos, N. (2026) · Artificial Intelligence and Applications · doi:10.47852/bonviewaia62027183 · Cited by 4
Fatimah, S., Sarwi, S., Linuwih, S., Dewi, N. R., Hartono, H., & Subali, B. (2026) · Journal of Turkish Science Education · doi:10.36681/tused.2026.004 · Cited by 4
Roziqin, R., Samsudin, A., Saepuzaman, D., Sari, H. N., & Iryanti, M. (2026) · STEM Education · doi:10.3934/steme.2026023 · Cited by 4
Olivier, C., & Weilbach, L. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72234-9_7 · Cited by 4
Rosas-Meléndez, S. A., Chans, G. M., López-Velázquez, P. M., Álvarez-Siordia, F. M., & Camacho-Zúñiga, C. (2024) · Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-9255-9_13 · Cited by 4
Kotsis, K. Τ., & Vakarou, G. (2025) · European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning · doi:10.59324/ejceel.2025.3(4).03 · Cited by 4
Alieto, E. O., Dumagay, A. H., Eijansantos, A. M., Estigoy, E. B., Vallejo, R. G., & Serdenia, J. R. C. (2025) · Information systems engineering and management · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05306-0_11 · Cited by 5
Nkolika, C. J. (2026) · HAMKA INSIGHT · doi:10.51574/hamka.v4i1.124 · Cited by 4
ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Opportunities, Perceptions, and ChallengesPreprint
Apata, O. E. (2025) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202507.0567.v1 · Cited by 4
Xia, L. A., & Beech, H. (2025) · Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1515/jccall-2024-0031 · Cited by 3
Henze, J., Lademann, J., Bresges, A., & Becker, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1707534 · Cited by 5
Exploring physics students’ attitudes toward ChatGPT using the ABC model
Veith, J. M., Bauer, A., Becker, E., & Bitzenbauer, P. (2026) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.29333/ejmste/17822 · Cited by 3
Towards a Sustainable and Ethical Integration of AI Chatbots in Higher Education
Voicu, M.-C., Sîrghi, N., Mircea, G., & Toth, D. M.-M. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18052534 · Cited by 3
ChatGPT in Secondary Education
Pardede, S., Sinaga, D. F., & Simamora, S. (2026) · Education as Change · doi:10.25159/1947-9417/20308 · Cited by 3
Polishchuk, T., Бабенко, О., & Daniels, L. M. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1736192 · Cited by 3
Abdelrahman, M., Hu, S., Al-Shamaileh, O., Hammady, R., & Nizamuddin, N. (2026) · Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/jices-09-2025-0261 · Cited by 3
Fadillah, M. A., Husin, M., Usmeldi, U., & Asrizal, A. (2026) · International Journal of Educational Reform · doi:10.1177/10567879261464157 · Cited by 3
Can We Trust AI Chatbots to Teach University Physics? A Performance Comparison of AI Chatbots
Robledo-Rella, V., González-Nucamendi, A., Neri, L., García-Castelán, R. M. G., Noguez, J., & Valverde-Rebaza, J. (2025) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon62633.2025.11016485 · Cited by 3
Mapping the complexity of learners’ attitudes toward ChatGPT: preliminary validation of a new scale
Zhang, Y.-C., Xue, X., Ding, M., & Yang, X.-M. (2025) · Behavior and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2025.2520595 · Cited by 2
Can ChatGPT be integrated into Blended Learning in Science: A Systematic Literature Review
Rusdiawan, A., Hasriyani, E., Zeswita, A. L., Ruth Rize Paas Megahati, S., & Susanto, N. (2024) · Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA · doi:10.29303/jppipa.v10i2.7001 · Cited by 3
CHATWISE “ChatGPT: As a High School Academic Tool for Writing, Innovation, Skills, and Education”
Nouzri, S., Fatimi, M. E., & Cuba, A. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-65691-0_8 · Cited by 2
Between pixels and principles: the responsible use of AI-generated images in physiology education
Carpes, F. P., Umpierre, D., Cadore, E. L., Diefenthaeler, F., Pinheiro, E. D. S., & Laitano, O. (2025) · AJP Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00095.2025 · Cited by 2
Balasoto, R. L., de la Peña, M. T. C., & Domingo, J. F. C. (2025) · International Journal of Research and Review · doi:10.52403/ijrr.20251144 · Cited by 3
Tian, X., Li, J., & Ji, Y. (2026) · Frontiers of digital education. · doi:10.1007/s44366-026-0079-x · Cited by 3
Use of Generative AI by Veterinary Students in Two UK Vet Schools: A Moment in Time
Rhind, S. M., Connelly, L., Baillie, S., Shaw, D. J., & Dickson, J. (2026) · Journal of Veterinary Medical Education · doi:10.3138/jvme-2025-0078 · Cited by 2
Olea, F. E. P., & Villacís-Macías, C. D. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1791361 · Cited by 3
Singh, R. G., Chow, K. M., Dong, H., Wong, H., Fung, M., Myers, P. S., Wong, L. L. C., Lai, P., Ngai, C. S. B., Koon, A. C., et al. (2026) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2026.101729 · Cited by 2
Sabani, A., Farah, M. H., Catyanadika, P. E., Dewi, D. R. S., & Tawani, V. (2026) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100667 · Cited by 4
Investigating the Driving Factors of the Use of Generative AI Among College Students
Tang, J. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-65884-6_23 · Cited by 2
Using AI tools to analyze periodic phenomena
Klay, J. L., Pinski, A., Schackel, K., Sieger, Z., Simpson, I., Walas, M., & Rakestraw, D. J. (2025) · The Physics Teacher · doi:10.1119/5.0263636 · Cited by 2
Mengfan, Z., & Osman, K. (2025) · Learning and analytics in intelligent systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-80388-8_1 · Cited by 2
Ties of Trust: a bowtie model to uncover trustor-trustee relationships in LLMs
Paraschou, E., Michali, M., Yfantidou, S., Karamanidis, S., Kalogeros, S. R., & Vakali, A. I. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732115 · Cited by 5
More than a chatbot: Human-centered AI for student engagement and academic efficiency
(2025) · Issues in Information Systems · doi:10.48009/1_iis_124 · Cited by 2
What is the AIGC-assisted learning experience like? -- A study based on conceptual understanding
Lu, Y., Wang, D. Y., & Wu, J. (2024) · International Conference on Intelligent Education and Computer Technology (IECT) · doi:10.1145/3687311.3687403 · Cited by 1
Educational Use of AI Chatbot Responses: Exploring Situational Relevance in Higher Education
Hong, B. H., & Luo, M. (2024) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.1144 · Cited by 1
Eom, S. B. (2025) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-90863-7_6 · Cited by 1
Li, X., Zh, L., Jiang, S., Chen, J., & Chen, W. (2026) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-026-00641-y · Cited by 1
Self-citationPablo, K. D., Cadorna, K. G., Cabanag, R., Berganio, A. L., Roberto, R. P., Guieb, J. M., Barbieto, E., Dapiawen, K. J., & Peña, L. V. C. D. (2025) · Psychology and Education A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.70838/pemj.350304 · Cited by 1
Fatimah, S., Sarwi, S., Linuwih, S., & Dewi, N. R. (2025) · International Journal of Scientific Multidisciplinary Research · doi:10.55927/ijsmr.v3i5.261 · Cited by 1
Generative AI in Physics Education: Evaluating Tools and Teaching Approaches
Qiu, K., & Zhang, T. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-94171-9_38 · Cited by 1
Meng, C. C., Fen, T. S., Ping, P. F., & Leong, A. F. Y. (2025) · International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development · doi:10.6007/ijarped/v14-i3/25773 · Cited by 1
Choi, Y.-S., & Kim, M. (2025) · Journal of the Korean earth science society · doi:10.5467/jkess.2025.46.3.226 · Cited by 1
Lee, Y., & Otani, M. (2025) · LLT Journal A Journal on Language and Language Teaching · doi:10.24071/llt.v28i2.11518 · Cited by 2
Artificial Intelligence Tools to Enrich Teaching and Learning- A Review
Anuradha, P. (2025) · International Conference on Inventive Systems and Control (ICISC) · doi:10.1109/icisc65841.2025.11188363 · Cited by 1
Labrado-Antolín, M. (2025) · American Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.32674/t2qnzc90 · Cited by 1
Santiago, N. E. N., Bucaloy, M. A. G., Reyes, J. C. M. D., Vallente, M. A., & Vergara, C. R. (2025) · OALib · doi:10.4236/oalib.1113885 · Cited by 1
When AI evaluates its own work: Validating learner-initiated, AI-generated physics practice problems
Geisler, T., & Kortemeyer, G. (2026) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/9hh9-vt4d · Cited by 1
Chan, H. Y., & Erduran, S. (2026) · Research in Science & Technological Education · doi:10.1080/02635143.2026.2669549 · Cited by 1
Kızıltaş, Y. (2026) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-026-14029-6 · Cited by 1
Anonymous, & Bentley, I. (2026) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/bdl1-6bn4 · Cited by 1
Tran, Q. G., & Truong, T. D. (2026) · Journal of Education and e-Learning Research · doi:10.20448/jeelr.v13i3.8882 · Cited by 1
LLMs in text linguistics teaching: an exploratory study with genAI novices in higher education
Brocca, N., & Garassino, D. (2026) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2026.100414 · Cited by 1
Mahlaba, S. C. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1783496 · Cited by 1
Development and Implementation of an AI Tutor To Scaffold Problem-Solving in Introductory Chemistry
Wang, K. D., Arens, J. T., Yu, C., Smith, J., Bartels, H., Haub, M., Fung, F. M., Haber, N., Salehi, S., & Poehlmann, J. S. (2026) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.6c00039 · Cited by 1
EXPLORING EFL STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVES ON INTEGRATING GEMINI AI CHATBOT’S IN ACADEMIC WRITING COURSES
Tran, T. T. T., Liên, C. T. X., & Nguyen, H. V. (2026) · HUE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES · doi:10.26459/hueunijssh.v135i6b.7718 · Cited by 1
Hosseinnia, M., Domsky, J. G., & Rahimian, S. (2024) · Reflective Practice · doi:10.1080/14623943.2024.2421591 · Cited by 1
Cornelison, B. R., Edwards, C., Zhang, C., Dean, J., Halloran, J., Middleton, A., & Erstad, B. L. (2025) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101910 · Cited by 1
GenAI in a middle school physics class: perceptions and challenges in the Portuguese context
Perdigão, S., Saúde, I., Araújo, J. L., Carvalho, P. S., & Hahn, M. D. (2026) · Physics Education · doi:10.1088/1361-6552/ae8498 · Cited by 1
Vald, G., Sermet, Y., & Demir, İ. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.03.11.26348161 · Cited by 1
The Impact of Anthropomorphizing Large Language Models-based Chatbots: A Scoping ReviewPreprint
D’elia, Y., Caballa, N., Nguyen, C., Tong, X., Kadambi, A., & Aziz‐Zadeh, L. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9224936/v1 · Cited by 1
AI literacy and STEM education: emerging frontiers and research priorities
Hällström, J., Chiu, T. K. F., Ding, M., Koretsky, M., & Li, Y. (2026) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-026-00653-8 · Cited by 1
Power Resilience Planning under the Threat of Artificial Intelligence
Corbett, C., Nguyen, C., Hongchai, D. M., Thorat, P., Prasad, P., von Schimmelmann, S., Weber, C. M., & Anderson, T. R. (2024) · Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) · doi:10.23919/picmet64035.2024.10653083
Pedagogical support for the use of artificial intelligence at university
Rakhimova, T. A., & Kaseka, I. P. (2024) · Professional education in the modern world · doi:10.20913/2618-7515-2024-3-12
Urban, M., Lukavský, J., Brom, C., Hein, V., Svacha, F., Děchtěrenko, F., & Urban, K. (2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/68fh4_v2
EAPD Diagnosis Diagnosis Using AI
Sruthi, P., Sravanthi, J., N, R. M., Balasse, Z., Raj, S. M. P., & Supreeth, B. R. (2025) · International Conference on Intelligent Control, Computing and Communications (IC3) · doi:10.1109/ic363308.2025.10956350
The AIMED model: Creating opportunities for AI in Higher EducationPreprint
Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., Neubert, C., Hauck, J., & Böhme, R. (2025) · EdArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/pzk9t_v1
International Intelligent Pedagogical Agents Research: Progress, Hotspots and Trends
Yao, Q., & Wang, M. (2025) · International Conference on Computer Science and Technologies in Education (CSTE) · doi:10.1109/cste64638.2025.11092252
Pedagogical Implications of ChatGPT on Accounting Assessment in Higher Education
Wong, H., Avdeev, V., & Nassiripour, S. (2025) · International Journal of Economics Business and Management Research · doi:10.51505/ijebmr.2025.9804
Apata, O. E., & Kwok, O. (2025) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202507.0567.v2
Pedagogical Opportunities and Practices in Science Lesson Design Using Generative AI
Choi, Y.-S., & Ha, Y.-H. (2025) · Journal of the Korean earth science society · doi:10.5467/jkess.2025.46.4.339
Alhusni, H. Z., Prahanı, B. K., Sunarti, T., Madlazim, M., Ramadani, R., & Ahmadi, M. (2025) · Journal of Current Studies in SDGs · doi:10.63230/jocsis.1.3.83
Maksymchuk, S. (2025) · Academia Polonica. · doi:10.23856/7110
AI-Supported Tutoring and Cognitive Learning Styles in an Engineering Mathematics Refresher Course
Potgieter, G., Klopper, B., Dyk, L. V., & van den Berg, L. (2025) · Proceedings from the International Research Symposium on Problem-Based Learning (IRSPBL) · doi:10.54337/irspbl-11060
Lernende und ihre emotionalen Anliegen in der Interaktion mit Chatbots
Schulz, L., & Schmid-Meier, C. (2025) · merz | medien + erziehung · doi:10.21240/merz/2025.6.09
Using Artificial Intelligence to support students’ active learning
Ali, N., & Aynsley, S. A. (2025) · Compass Journal of Learning and Teaching · doi:10.21100/compass.v17i2.1539
An Empirical Evaluation for LLMs Performance on AI Question and Answer in Bengali
Koner, S., Goswami, S., Chakrabarti, A., & Chakraborty, B. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-6537-2_7
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, L., Li, T., Jiang, S., & Gapud, A.
- Affiliations
- University of South Alabama (US)
- Ball State University (US)
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ding, Lu
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
- Published
- 2023-12-22
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2365-9440 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4390082902
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 44
- FWCI
- 48.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, generative AI, online tutoring, physics education, student perceptions, trust in AI, answer accuracy, AI literacy, misconceptions about AI, undergraduate students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
