Cited by 29Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvancements in Battery MaterialsControl Systems and Identification

Modeling and SOC estimation of lithium iron phosphate battery considering capacity loss

Open access
Li, Junhui, Gao, Fengjie, Yan, Gangui, Zhang, Tianyang, Li, Jianlin·2018·Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems

Abstract

Modeling and state of charge (SOC) estimation of Lithium cells are crucial techniques of the lithium battery management system. The modeling is extremely complicated as the operating status of lithium battery is affected by temperature, current, cycle number, discharge depth and other factors. This paper studies the modeling of lithium iron phosphate battery based on the Thevenin’s equivalent circuit and a method to identify the open circuit voltage, resistance and capacitance in the model is proposed. To improve the accuracy of the lithium battery model, a capacity estimation algorithm considering the capacity loss during the battery’s life cycle. In addition, this paper solves the SOC estimation issue of the lithium battery caused by the uncertain noise using the extended Kalman filtering (EKF) algorithm. A simulation model of actual lithium batteries is designed in Matlab/Simulink and the simulation results verify the accuracy of the model under different operating modes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s41601-018-0078-0

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When the SOC is 90-100%, the sensitivity of DC internal resistance is the largest.

    “When the SOC is 90-100%, the sensitivity of DC internal resistance is the largest [29].”

    From The Influence of Temperature on the Capacity of Lithium Ion Batteries with Different Anodes (2021) · cites this paper as [29]

    Section 3.1 says that SOC affects the battery model’s resistance parameters and describes estimating resistance at different SOCs. It does not say that DC internal resistance is most sensitive at 90–100% SOC. Searches for that range and for resistance sensitivity found no passage establishing the claimed ranking; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Sahu, B. K., Hiloidhari, M., & Baruah, D. C. (2013). Global trend in wind power with special focus on the top five wind power producing countries. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19(1), 348-359.
  2. Li, H., Eseye, A. T., Zhang, J., et al. (2017). Optimal energy management for industrial microgrids with high-penetration renewables. Protection & Control of Modern Power Systems, 2(1), 12.
  3. Bo, L., Zhijia, H., & Hao, J. (2016). Wind power status and development trends. Journal of Northeast Electric Power University, 36(02), 7-13.
  4. Xiaoming, Y., Shijie, C., & Jinyu, W. (2013). Prospects analysis of energy storage application in grid integration of large-scale wind power. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 37(1), 14-18.
  5. Yi, L., Guojun, T., & Xiaoqun, H. (2017). Optimized battery model based adaptive sigma Kalman filter for state of charge estimation. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 32(2), 108-118.
  6. Xikun, C., & Dong, S. (2016). Research on lithium-ion battery modeling and model parameter identification methods. Proceedings of the CSEE, 36(22), 6254-6261.
  7. Chen, Q., Zhao, X., & Gan, D. (2017). Active-reactive scheduling of active distribution system considering interactive load and battery storage. Protection & Control of Modern Power Systems, 2(1), 29.
  8. Cuiping, L., Pujia, C., Junhui, L., et al. (2017). Review on reactive voltage control methods for large-scale distributed PV integrated grid. Journal of Northeast Electric Power University, 37(02), 82-88.
  9. Xiaoyu, L., Chunbo, Z., Guo, W., et al. (2016). Online parameter estimation of a simplified impedance spectroscopy model based on the fractional joint Kalman filter for life PO 4 battery. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 31(24), 141-149.
  10. Yang, B., Jingmei, Y., Yingkai, Z., et al. (2017). A real-time rain flow algorithm and its application to state of health modeling for LiCoO 2 lithium-ion batteries. Proceedings of the CSEE, 37(12), 3627-3635.
  11. Xikun, C., Dong, S., & Xiaohu, C. (2015). Modeling and state of charge robust estimation for lithium-ion batteries. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 30(15), 141-147.
  12. Li, X., Huang, Y., Huang, J., et al. (2014). Modeling and control strategy of battery energy storage system for primary frequency regulation, International Conference on Power System Technology (pp. 543-549). IEEE.
  13. Junhui, L., Lian, J., Cuiping, L., et al. (2017). Control strategy designed for converter of super capacitor energy storage system. Journal of Northeast Electric Power University, 37(04), 32-38.
  14. Roscher, M. A., Assfalg, J., & Bohlen, O. S. (2011). Detection of utilizable capacity deterioration in battery systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 60(1), 98-103.
  15. Wei, S., Jiuchun, J., Yanru, Z., et al. (2015). Capacity fading and degradation mechanism of A123 battery. Power System Technology, 39(4), 899-903.
  16. Jinlong, Z., Wei, T., Duankai, L., et al. (2017). Rate capacity modeling and state of charge estimation of LiFePO4 battery. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 32(7), 215-222.
  17. Zhou, X., Zhang, B., Zhao, H., et al. (2013). State of charge estimation based on improved Li-ion battery model using extended Kalman filter[C], IEEE 8th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (pp. 607-612). IEEE.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, J., Gao, F., Yan, G., Zhang, T., & Li, J.
Affiliations
  • Northeast Electric Power University (CN)
  • State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company (China) (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Junhui
Venue
Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems
Published
2018-02-27
Volume
3
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2367-0983 (ISSN-L)
  • 2367-2617
OpenAlex
W2798194826
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Industrial Innovation of Jilin Province Development and Reform Commission (2017C017-2)
  • Jilin Provincial ‘13th Five-Year Plan’ Science and Technology Project ([2016]88)
  • Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Operation and Control of Renewable Energy & Storage Systems (DGB51201700424)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
Keywords
lithium iron phosphate batteries, state of charge estimation, battery modeling, Thevenin equivalent circuit, capacity fade, battery management systems, extended Kalman filter, parameter estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review