Cited by 80Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingMRI in cancer diagnosisPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research

A machine learning model for the prediction of survival and tumor subtype in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from preoperative diffusion-weighted imaging

Open access
Kaissis, Georgios, Ziegelmayer, Sebastian, Lohöfer, Fabian, Algül, Hana, Eiber, Matthias, Weichert, Wilko, Schmid, Roland, Friess, Helmut +4 more·2019·European Radiology Experimental

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To develop a supervised machine learning (ML) algorithm predicting above- versus below-median overall survival (OS) from diffusion-weighted imaging-derived radiomic features in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: One hundred two patients with histopathologically proven PDAC were retrospectively assessed as training cohort, and 30 prospectively accrued and retrospectively enrolled patients served as independent validation cohort (IVC). Tumors were segmented on preoperative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and radiomic features were extracted. A random forest ML algorithm was fit to the training cohort and tested in the IVC. Histopathological subtype of tumor samples was assessed by immunohistochemistry in 21 IVC patients. Individual radiomic feature importance was evaluated by assessment of tree node Gini impurity decrease and recursive feature elimination. Fisher's exact test, 95% confidence intervals (CI), and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) were used. RESULTS: The ML algorithm achieved 87% sensitivity (95% IC 67.3-92.7), 80% specificity (95% CI 74.0-86.7), and ROC-AUC 90% for the prediction of above- versus below-median OS in the IVC. Heterogeneity-related features were highly ranked by the model. Of the 21 patients with determined histopathological subtype, 8/9 patients predicted to experience below-median OS exhibited the quasi-mesenchymal subtype, whilst 11/12 patients predicted to experience above-median OS exhibited a non-quasi-mesenchymal subtype (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ML application to ADC radiomics allowed OS prediction with a high diagnostic accuracy in an IVC. The high overlap of clinically relevant histopathological subtypes with model predictions underlines the potential of quantitative imaging in PDAC pre-operative subtyping and prognosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s41747-019-0119-0

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]van Griethuysen Joost J.M. Fedorov Andriy Parmar Chintan Hosny Ahmed Aucoin Nicole Narayan Vivek Beets-Tan Regina G.H. Fillion-Robin Jean-Christophe Pieper Steve Aerts Hugo J.W.L. Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype Cancer Research 2017 77 21 e104 e107 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0339 29092951 PMC5672828 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaissis, G., Ziegelmayer, S., Lohöfer, F., Algül, H., Eiber, M., Weichert, W., Schmid, R., Friess, H., Rummeny, E., Ankerst, D., Siveke, J., & Braren, R.
Affiliations
  • TUM Klinikum (DE)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Corresponding author
Braren, Rickmer
Venue
European Radiology Experimental
Published
2019-10-17
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
41-41
ISSN
2509-9280 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981208442
Cited by
79
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4
FWCI
8.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Radiology Experimental (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 824 Project C6, SFB 824/ Project Z2)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Keywords
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, diffusion-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient, radiomics, overall survival prediction, tumor subtypes, random forest, preoperative imaging, tumor heterogeneity, prognosis
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Survival Rate, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Preoperative Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review