CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 102Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPalliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Degree to Which Spiritual Needs of Patients Near the End of Life Are Met

Hermann, Carla P.·2007·Oncology Nursing Forum
DOI 10.1188/07.onf.70-78
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To determine to what degree the spiritual needs of patients near the end of life are met. DESIGN: Descriptive. SETTING: One inpatient and five outpatient hospices. SAMPLE: 62 female and 38 male hospice patients with a mean age of 67 years; 74% were dying from cancer. METHODS: Each subject completed the Spiritual Needs Inventory and rated life satisfaction via the Cantril ladder. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Spiritual needs and life satisfaction. FINDINGS: Women, patients residing in a nursing home or an inpatient hospice unit, and patients with lower levels of education reported a higher number of unmet spiritual needs. Needs that could be met independently by patients and were not related to functional status were met at a higher rate than those that were dependent on others and on functional status. CONCLUSIONS: Spiritual activities are important to patients who are near the end of life, but these patients may have a variety of unmet spiritual needs that depend on many factors, including the care setting. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses must recognize the importance of spirituality to patients near the end of life. Assessment for specific spiritual needs can lead to the development of interventions to meet those needs. Meeting patients' spiritual needs can enhance their quality of life.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1188/07.onf.70-78

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Brady, M.J., Peterman, A.H., Fitchett, G., Mo, M., & Cella, D. (1999). A case for including spirituality in quality of life measurement in oncology. Psycho-Oncology, 8, 417-428. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 102

Related

Metadata

Authors
Hermann, C. P.
Affiliations
University of Louisville (US)
Corresponding author
Hermann, Carla P.
ORCID
Hermann, Carla P.
Venue
Oncology Nursing Forum
Publisher
Oncology Nursing Society (ONS)
Published
2007-01-01
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
70-78
ISSN
  • 0190-535X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-0688
DOI
10.1188/07.onf.70-78
OpenAlex
W1992259000
Cited by
102
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oncology nursing forum (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
spiritual needs, end-of-life care, hospice care, life satisfaction, cancer patients, nursing home residents, functional status
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Religion and Medicine, Terminal Care, Southeastern United States, Patient Satisfaction, Health Care Surveys, Needs Assessment, Nurse's Role, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review