The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Monocyte subpopulations and their differentiation patterns during infection
Abstract
The term “monocyte” implies a single, homogenous population of cells with uniform physiology. Recent evidence from a number of laboratories indicates that it is likely that blood monocytes may consist of several subpopulations of cells, which differ in size, nuclear morphology, granularity, and functionality. The aim of this review is to give a summary of the new findings in the emerging field of monocyte heterogeneity. We provide a short description of the differentiation patterns of blood monocyte subpopulations, with an emphasis on how these subpopulations can be influenced by infection. We provide a comparison among the main monocyte subpopulations in humans, mice, and rats and illustrate some of the common features of these cells and some of the important interspecies distinctions. We will also discuss the bone marrow precursors of these cells and the differentiation patterns of these subsets in different tissues in response to infection. Most of the data about monocyte trafficking during infection are necessarily derived from murine models, and comparisons between mouse and man must be made with caution. However, these models may provide interesting springboards to permit us to speculate about the topic of monocyte heterogeneity in humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity
Gordon, S., & Taylor, P. R. (2005) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1733 · Cited by 5,190
Distinct Differentiation Potential of Blood Monocyte Subsets in the Lung
Landsman, L., Varol, C., & Jung, S. (2007) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.178.4.2000 · Cited by 322
Cited by
Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation
Mosser, D. M., & Edwards, J. P. (2008) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2448 · Cited by 9,144
“The extrapolation of data from mice to humans becomes confusing because human monocytes, which can also be separated into two general categories based on their expression of cell-surface markers, seem to have distinct physiology from that of mouse monocyte”
BackgroundSelf-citationMonocyte recruitment during infection and inflammation
Shi, C., & Pamer, E. G. (2011) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3070 · Cited by 3,015
Monocytes in atherosclerosis: subsets and functions
Woollard, K. J., & Geissmann, F. (2010) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2009.228 · Cited by 890
Yang, Q., Guo, N., Zhou, Y., Chen, J., Wei, Q., & Han, M. (2020) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2020.04.004 · Cited by 471
Rangaraju, S., Dammer, E. B., Raza, S. A., Rathakrishnan, P., Xiao, H., Gao, T., Duong, D. M., Pennington, M. W., Lah, J. J., Seyfried, N. T., et al. (2018) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-018-0254-8 · Cited by 430
Metadata
- Authors
- Strauss-Ayali, D., Conrad, S. M., & Mosser, D. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Leukocyte Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-05-02
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 244-252
- ISSN
- 0741-5400 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3673
- OpenAlex
- W2137798077
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monocyte subpopulations and their differentiation patterns during infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1189/jlb.0307191
- The paper
- Strauss-Ayali, D., Conrad, S. M., & Mosser, D. M. (2007). Monocyte subpopulations and their differentiation patterns during infection. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0307191
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.