The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Occam's inversion; a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data
Abstract
The inversion of electromagnetic sounding data does not yield a unique solution, but inevitably a single model to interpret the observations is sought. We recommend that this model be as simple, or smooth, as possible, in order to reduce the temptation to overinterpret the data and to eliminate arbitrary discontinuities in simple layered models.To obtain smooth models, the nonlinear forward problem is linearized about a starting model in the usual way, but it is then solved explicitly for the desired model rather than for a model correction. By parameterizing the model in terms of its first or second derivative with depth, the minimum norm solution yields the smoothest possible model.Rather than fitting the experimental data as well as possible (which maximizes the roughness of the model), the smoothest model which fits the data to within an expected tolerance is sought. A practical scheme is developed which optimizes the step size at each iteration and retains the computational efficiency of layered models, resulting in a stable and rapidly convergent algorithm. The inversion of both magnetotelluric and Schlumberger sounding field data, and a joint magnetotelluric-resistivity inversion, demonstrate the method and show it to have practical application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters
Marquardt, D. W. (1963) · Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1137/0111030 · Cited by 30,728
de Boor, C. (1978) · Applied Mathematical Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-6333-3 · Cited by 11,944
Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems.
Bell, J. B., Tikhonov, A. N., & Arsenin, V. Y. (1978) · Mathematics of Computation · doi:10.2307/2006360 · Cited by 8,101
‘History of Western Philosophy’
Russell, P. (1949) · International Affairs · doi:10.1093/ia/25.2.247 · Cited by 406
Parker, R. L. (1980) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/jb085ib08p04421 · Cited by 269
Self-citationNumerical methods for establishing solutions to the inverse problem of electromagnetic induction
Parker, R. L., & Whaler, K. A. (1981) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/jb086ib10p09574 · Cited by 203
Self-citationVariational methods in optimization
Smith, D. R. (1974) · Cited by 199
Jones, A. G., & Hutton, R. (1979) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.1979.tb00169.x · Cited by 75
Cited by
ModEM: A modular system for inversion of electromagnetic geophysical data
Kelbert, A., Meqbel, N., Egbert, G. D., & Tandon, K. (2014) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2014.01.010 · Cited by 855
Global geomagnetic field models for the past 3000 years: transient or permanent flux lobes?
Constable, C. G., Johnson, C. L., & Lund, S. P. (2000) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2000.0570 · Cited by 114
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Constable, S. C., Parker, R. L., & Constable, C. G.
- Venue
- Geophysics
- Publisher
- Society of Exploration Geophysicists
- Published
- 1987-03-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 289-300
- ISSN
- 0016-8033 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2108064160
- Cited by
- 2,772
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 13.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Occam's inversion; a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1190/1.1442303
- The paper
- Constable, S. C., Parker, R. L., & Constable, C. G. (1987). Occam's inversion; a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442303
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.