Global geomagnetic field models for the past 3000 years: transient or permanent flux lobes?
Abstract
PSVMOD1.0 is a compilation of globally distributed palaeodirectional data from archaeomagnetic artefacts, lava flows, and lake sediments at 24 sites evaluated at 100 year intervals from 1000 BC to AD 1800. We estimate uncertainty in these measures of declination and inclination by comparison with predictions from standard historical models in time–intervals of overlap, and use the 100–year samples and their associated uncertainties to construct a sequence of minimum structure global geomagnetic field models. Global predictions of radial magnetic field at the coremantle boundary (CMB), as well as inclination and declination anomalies at the Earth's surface, provide an unprecedented view of geomagnetic secular variations over the past 3000 years, and demonstrate a consistent evolution of the field with time. Resolution of the models is poorest in the Southern Hemisphere, where only six of the 24 sites are located, several with incomplete temporal coverage. Low–flux regions seen in the historical field near the North Pole are poorly resolved, but the Northern Hemisphere flux lobes are clearly visible in the models. These lobes are not fixed in position and intensity, but they only rarely venture into the Pacific hemisphere. The Pacific region is seen to have experienced significant secular variation: a strong negative inclination anomaly in the region, like that seen in 0–5 Ma models, persists from 1000 BC until AD 1000 and then gradually evolves into the smaller positive anomaly seen today. On average between 1000 BC and AD 1800, the non–axial–dipole contribution to the radial magnetic field at the core–mantle boundary is largest in the north–central Pacific, and beneath Central Asia, with clear non–zonal contributions. At the Earth's surface, average inclination anomalies are large and negative in the central Pacific, and most positive slightly to the east of Central Africa. Inclination anomalies decrease with increasing latitude. Average declinations are smallest in equatorial regions, again with strong longitudinal variations, largest negative departures are centred over Australia and Eastern Asia. Secular variation at the Earth's surface is quantified by standard deviation of inclination and declination about their average values, and at the CMB by standard deviation in radial magnetic field. All three show significant geographical variations, but appear incompatible with the idea that secular variation in the Pacific hemisphere is permanently attenuated by greatly enhanced conductivity in D00 beneath the region.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The auroral isochasms for AD 1700-1942 are not applicable to 567 BC because the geomagnetic field was substantially different.
“However, the auroral isochasms for the interval AD 1700-1942 are not applicable to 567 BC, since average spherical harmonic models (100year means) of the geomagnetic field imply that the geographic co-ordinates of the north geomagnetic pole (centred dipole axis) were about 82°N and 35°E around 567 BC (Constable et al. 2000).”
From The earliest datable observation of the aurora borealis (2004) · cites this paper as Constable et al. 2000
The geomagnetic (dipole) latitude of Babylon was about 41°N in 567 BC, compared with the present value of 27.5°N.
“This observation occurred at a time when the geomagnetic (dipole) latitude of Babylon was about 41°N compared with the present value of 27.5°N”
From The earliest datable observation of the aurora borealis (2004) · cites this paper as Constable et al. 2000
The north geomagnetic pole around 567 BC was about 82°N and 35°E.
“average spherical harmonic models (100year means) of the geomagnetic field imply that the geographic co-ordinates of the north geomagnetic pole (centred dipole axis) were about 82°N and 35°E around 567 BC (Constable et al. 2000).”
From The earliest datable observation of the aurora borealis (2004) · cites this paper as Constable et al. 2000
The occurrence frequency of bright aurorae in Babylon in the 6th century BC could easily have been approximately once per decade.
“Consequently, the occurrence frequency of bright aurorae in Babylon in the 6th century BC could easily have been approximately once per decade, even without allowing for any questionable short-lived geomagnetic excursion at that time (Raspopov et al. 2003).”
From The earliest datable observation of the aurora borealis (2004) · cites this paper as Constable et al. 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reconstructing Holocene geomagnetic field variation: new methods, models and implications.
Nilsson, A., Holme, R., Korte, M., Suttie, N., & Hill, M. (2014) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1093/gji/ggu120 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
The earliest datable observation of the aurora borealis
Stephenson, F. R., Willis, D. M., & Hallinan, T. J. (2004) · Astronomy and Geophysics · doi:10.1046/j.1468-4004.2003.45615.x · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Ezekiel and the Northern Lights: Biblical aurora seems plausible
Siscoe, G. L., Silverman, S. M., & Siebert, K. D. (2002) · Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union · doi:10.1029/2002eo000113 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Constable, C. G., Johnson, C. L., & Lund, S. P.
- Affiliations
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
- Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2000-03-15
- Volume
- 358
- Issue
- 1768
- Pages
- 991-1008
- ISSN
- 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2962
- OpenAlex
- W1988295073
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Keywords
- geomagnetic field models, geomagnetic secular variation, paleomagnetism, historical geomagnetic field
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review