The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stochastic reservoir characterization using prestack seismic data
Abstract
Reservoir characterization must be based on information from various sources. Well observations, seismic reflection times, and seismic amplitude versus offset (AVO) attributes are integrated in this study to predict the distribution of the reservoir variables, i.e., facies and fluid filling. The prediction problem is cast in a Bayesian setting. The a priori model includes spatial coupling through Markov random field assumptions and intervariable dependencies through nonlinear relations based on rock physics theory, including Gassmann's relation. The likelihood model relating observations to reservoir variables (including lithology facies and pore fluids) is based on approximations to Zoeppritz equations. The model assumptions are summarized in a Bayesian network illustrating the dependencies between the reservoir variables. The posterior model for the reservoir variables conditioned on the available observations is defined by the a priori and likelihood models. This posterior model is not analytically tractable but can be explored by Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. Realizations of reservoir variables from the posterior model are used to predict the facies and fluid-filling distribution in the reservoir. A maximum a posteriori (MAP) criterion is used in this study to predict facies and pore-fluid distributions. The realizations are also used to present probability maps for the favorable (sand, oil) occurrence in the reservoir. Finally, the impact of seismic AVO attributes—AVO gradient, in particular—is studied. The approach is demonstrated on real data from a turbidite sedimentary system in the North Sea. AVO attributes on the interface between reservoir and cap rock are extracted from 3D seismic AVO data. The AVO gradient is shown to be valuable in reducing the ambiguity between facies and fluids in the prediction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lauritzen, S. L. (1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198522195.001.0001 · Cited by 2,976
Cited by
Bayesian networks in environmental modelling
Aguilera, P. A., Fernández, A., Fernández, R., Rumí, R., & Salmerón, A. (2011) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.06.004 · Cited by 666
Bosch, M., Mukerji, T., & Gonzalez, E. F. (2010) · Geophysics · doi:10.1190/1.3478209 · Cited by 517
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Eidsvik, J., Avseth, P., Omre, H., Mukerji, T., & Mavko, G.
- Venue
- Geophysics
- Publisher
- Society of Exploration Geophysicists
- Published
- 2004-01-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 978-993
- ISSN
- 0016-8033 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2030619630
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stochastic reservoir characterization using prestack seismic data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1190/1.1778241
- The paper
- Eidsvik, J., Avseth, P., Omre, H., Mukerji, T., & Mavko, G. (2004). Stochastic reservoir characterization using prestack seismic data. Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1778241
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.