Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,103

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure

Lim, Kevin, Treitz, Paul, Wulder, Michael, St-Onge, Benoît, Flood, Martin·2003·Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment

Abstract

Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology provides horizontal and vertical information at high spatial resolutions and vertical accuracies. Forest attributes such as canopy height can be directly retrieved from LiDAR data. Direct retrieval of canopy height provides opportunities to model above-ground biomass and canopy volume. Access to the vertical nature of forest ecosystems also offers new opportunities for enhanced forest monitoring, management and planning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1191/0309133303pp360ra

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,103

Metadata

Authors
Lim, K., Treitz, P., Wulder, M., St-Onge, B., & Flood, M.
Venue
Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment
Published
2003-03
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
88-106
ISSN
  • 0309-1333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0296
OpenAlex
W2098919237
Cited by
1,103
References
0
FWCI
29.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1191/0309133303pp360ra
The paper
Lim, K., Treitz, P., Wulder, M., St-Onge, B., & Flood, M. (2003). LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309133303pp360ra

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.