Cited by 74Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeDrug-Induced Ocular Toxicity

Quality of life in multiple sclerosis: influence of interferon-β1a (Avonex®) treatment

Vermersch, P, de Seze, J, Delisse, B, Lemaire, S, Stojkovic, T·2002·Multiple Sclerosis Journal

Abstract

Background Numerous data argue for initiating treatment with interferon-beta (IFN-beta) at an early stage in multiple sderosis (MS). The consequences of its use may negatively influence the MS patient's quality of life (QoL). Objective To evaluate the QoL of MS patients before and after a one-year period of treatment with IFN-beta1a (Avonex). Patients and methods QoL was assessed using the SF-36 in 121 relapsing-remitting MS patients. We compared QoL before and after treatment and with data from a normal population. We also studied the possible influence of disease progression on the SF-36 scores. Results One hundred six patients completed the study (87%). Compared to a normal population, patients were, at baseline, worse off for all QoL scales, varying from a minimum decrease of 0.73 SD in mental health, to a maximum decrease of 1.55 SD in general health. After treatment, we found no significant changes in any of the QoL scores, except for physical function, where we noted a slight but significant decrease (p = 0.03). Furthermore, there was no significant change either in the physical component summary (PCS) or mental component summary (MCS). The 'reported health transition' item was significantly improved compared to baseline (p = 0.001). At indusion, significant correlations were found between EDSS scores and scores of physical function (p Conclusion The QoL, assessed by the SF-36 scale, is correlated with disability in MS. IFN-beta1a treatment (Avonex) has no negative eff…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1191/1352458502ms826oa

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vermersch, P., de Seze, J., Delisse, B., Lemaire, S., & Stojkovic, T.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital Roger Salengro (FR)
  • Department of Neurology, Hôpital R. Salengro, Lille 59037, France
  • Centre Hospitalier de Lens (FR)
Corresponding author
Vermersch, P
Venue
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Published
2002-10
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
377-381
ISSN
  • 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0970
OpenAlex
W2157204060
Cited by
74
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, quality of life, interferon beta-1a, Avonex, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, SF-36, disability progression, Expanded Disability Status Scale, physical function, social function, early treatment
MeSH terms
Interferon beta-1a, Adjuvants, Immunologic, Adult, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Interferon-beta, Disease Progression, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review