Cited by 41Cerebrovascular and genetic disordersMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesVasculitis and related conditions

CADASIL imitating multiple sclerosis: the importance of MRI markers

O'Riordan, S, Nor, A M, Hutchinson, M·2002·Multiple Sclerosis Journal

Abstract

Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) can mimic multiple sclerosis (MS), leading to diagnostic confusion. We report a family with CADASIL in which the index case and the daughter of the index case were initially erroneously diagnosed with MS. Relatively specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers of CADASIL include involvement of the anterior temporal lobes and external capsules and, as illustrated in this report, these MRI findings may aid in the differentiation of the two conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1191/1352458502ms834oa

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anterior temporal lobe involvement on MRI is highly specific and can distinguish CADASIL from other conditions.

    “Previous evidence suggests that anterior temporal lobe involvement on MR images is highly specific and allows for distinguishing CADASIL from other conditions [1, 2, 10, 27, 43, 52, 54, 64, 68–70, 76].”
  • External capsule lesions have been proposed as a potential diagnostic feature of CADASIL, but they occur in a lower proportion of patients and have lower diagnostic specificity.

    “The presence of lesions in the external capsule has also been proposed as a potential diagnostic feature of CADASIL [1, 3, 9, 10, 43, 52, 54, 58, 64, 65, 76], although it has been reported in a lower proportion of patients and has been associated with a lower diagnostic specificity [69].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Riordan, S., Nor, A. M., & Hutchinson, M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Neurology, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland
  • St. Vincent's University Hospital (IE)
Corresponding author
Hutchinson, M
Venue
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Published
2002-10
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
430-432
ISSN
  • 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0970
OpenAlex
W2161362672
Cited by
41
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
Keywords
CADASIL, multiple sclerosis, differential diagnosis, MRI markers, leukoencephalopathy, subcortical infarcts, familial case, misdiagnosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Diagnosis, Differential, Diagnostic Errors, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Dementia, Multi-Infarct

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review