Construction or obstruction: teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom
Open accessAbstract
To what extent do teachers of EFL hinder or facilitate learner contributions by their use of language? How can teachers enhance the quantity and quality of learner output by more careful language use? In what ways do teachers deny learning opportunities by ‘filling in the gaps’ or ‘smoothing over’ learner contributions? Adopting the position that maximizing learner involvement is conducive to second language acquisition, this paper examines the ways in which teachers, through their choice of language, construct or obstruct learner participation in face-to-face classroom communication. From the lesson extracts emerge a number of ways in which teachers can improve their teacher talk to facilitate and optimize learner contributions. The conclusion, that teachers’ ability to control their use of language is at least as important as their ability to select appropriate methodologies, has implications for both teacher education and classroom practices.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Extended wait-time can increase the number of students' responses and lead to more complex answers as well as learner/learner interaction.
“Additionally, it can increase the number of students' responses and lead to more complex answers as well as learner/learner interaction (Walsh, 2002).”
From An investigation into the classroom talk of Iranian EFL novice vs. experienced teachers (2019) · cites this paper as Walsh, 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Student thought and classroom language: examining the mechanisms of change in dialogic teaching
Reznitskaya, A., & Gregory, M. (2013) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.775898 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Garcia, E. B. (2018) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.09.005 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Teacher Talk and Learner Involvement in EFL Classroom: The Case of Iranian Setting
Shamsipour, A., & Allami, H. (2012) · Theory and Practice in Language Studies · doi:10.4304/tpls.2.11.2262-2268 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Teacher Interruptions and Limited Wait Time in EFL Young Learner Classrooms
Yataganbaba, E., & Yıldırım, R. (2016) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.094 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
An investigation into the classroom talk of Iranian EFL novice vs. experienced teachers
Ghajarieh, A., Jalali, N., & Mozaheb, M. A. (2019) · Register Journal · doi:10.18326/rgt.v12i2.100-125 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Walsh’s (2006a) SETT framework is founded upon social constructivist theory has roots in conversation analysis with the SETT standing for Self-Evaluation of Teacher Talk.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTeachers’ Classroom Interactional Competence: Scale Development and Validation
Tajeddin, Z., & Kamali, J. (2023) · Language Teaching Research Quarterly · doi:10.32038/ltrq.2023.35.01 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Walsh, S.
- Affiliations
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Walsh, Steve
- ORCID
- Walsh, Steve
- Venue
- Language Teaching Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-23
- ISSN
- 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0954
- OpenAlex
- W2125317719
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 22.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Keywords
- teacher discourse, student involvement, EFL classroom, classroom communication, second language acquisition, teacher language, student participation, teacher professional development, teaching practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review