Cited by 16EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesCommunication in Education and Healthcare

Teacher Interruptions and Limited Wait Time in EFL Young Learner Classrooms

Open access
Yataganbaba, Esra, Yıldırım, Rana·2016·Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

In human interaction, change of speakership becomes natural at certain points in utterances called Transition Relevance Places (TRPs), and if a listener steps in at a point that is not a TRP, an interruption, and thus a potential trouble may emerge. In an EFL classroom, a teacher can create learning opportunities by managing interaction successfully, with awareness of TRPs and potential interruptions. Lack of this awareness, conversely, may lead to teacher interruptions and limited student participation. This paper attempts to show how teachers⿿ interruptions and limited wait-time practices affect learner participation and learning opportunities in EFL young learner classrooms. The data consist of transcriptions of video recorded classroom interactions that come from three fifth grade intermediate level classrooms. The findings revealed that teachers⿿ interruptions and limited wait-time obstructed learner participation and learning opportunities in both form-and-accuracy and meaning-and-fluency contexts ( Seedhouse, 2004 ). The results demonstrate that teachers⿿ use of language and their Classroom Interactional Competence (CIC, Walsh, 2006 ) are crucial for providing sufficient learning space and facilitating learner engagement. Implications are discussed for teacher education and teachers⿿ CIC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.094

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yataganbaba, E., & Yıldırım, R.
Affiliations
Cukurova University (TR)
Venue
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
232
Pages
689-695
ISSN
1877-0428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2538174251
Cited by
15
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
8.33
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Hitit University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
Keywords
young EFL learners, classroom interaction, student participation, classroom interactional competence, teacher language, learning opportunities, fifth-grade classroom

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review