Classroom L2 vocabulary acquisition: investigating the role of pedagogical tasks and form-focused instruction
Abstract
Framed under a cognitive approach to task-based L2 learning, this study used a pedagogical approach to investigate the effects of three vocabulary lessons (one traditional and two task-based) on acquisition of basic meanings, forms and morphological aspects of Spanish words. Quantitative analysis performed on the data suggests that the type of pedagogical approach had no impact on immediate retrieval (after treatment) of targeted word forms, but it had an impact on long-term retrieval (one week) of targeted forms. In particular, task-based lessons seemed to be more effective than the Presentation, Practice and Production (PPP) lesson. The analysis also suggests that a task-based lesson with an explicit focus-on-forms component was more effective than a task-based lesson that did not incorporate this component in promoting acquisition of word morphological aspects. The results also indicate that the explicit focus on forms component may be more effective when placed at the end of the lesson, when meaning has been acquired. Results are explained in terms of qualitative differences in amounts of focus on form and meaning, type of form-focused instruction provided, and opportunities for on-line targeted output retrieval. The findings of this study provide evidence for the value of a proactive (Doughty and Williams, 1998a) form-focused approach to Task-Based L2 vocabulary learning, especially structure-based production tasks (Ellis, 2003). Overall, they suggest an important role o…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most studies comparing TBLT and TSLT have been short term and/or methodologically flawed.
“Unfortunately, most of the studies that have sought to compare TBLT and TSLT (e.g.De la Fuente, 2006;Laufer, 2006;Sheen, 2006) have been short term and/ or methodologically flawed.”
From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as De la Fuente, 2006
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 45 · Cited by 240
- Authors
- de la Fuente, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University, USA,
- Venue
- Language Teaching Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 263-295
- ISSN
- 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0954
- OpenAlex
- W2103974034
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 5.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
- Keywords
- second language vocabulary acquisition, task-based language learning, form-focused instruction, Spanish as a second language, word morphology, presentation-practice-production, proactive approach
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review