Cited by 240Second Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSubtitles and Audiovisual Media

Classroom L2 vocabulary acquisition: investigating the role of pedagogical tasks and form-focused instruction

de la Fuente, Maria J.·2006·Language Teaching Research

Abstract

Framed under a cognitive approach to task-based L2 learning, this study used a pedagogical approach to investigate the effects of three vocabulary lessons (one traditional and two task-based) on acquisition of basic meanings, forms and morphological aspects of Spanish words. Quantitative analysis performed on the data suggests that the type of pedagogical approach had no impact on immediate retrieval (after treatment) of targeted word forms, but it had an impact on long-term retrieval (one week) of targeted forms. In particular, task-based lessons seemed to be more effective than the Presentation, Practice and Production (PPP) lesson. The analysis also suggests that a task-based lesson with an explicit focus-on-forms component was more effective than a task-based lesson that did not incorporate this component in promoting acquisition of word morphological aspects. The results also indicate that the explicit focus on forms component may be more effective when placed at the end of the lesson, when meaning has been acquired. Results are explained in terms of qualitative differences in amounts of focus on form and meaning, type of form-focused instruction provided, and opportunities for on-line targeted output retrieval. The findings of this study provide evidence for the value of a proactive (Doughty and Williams, 1998a) form-focused approach to Task-Based L2 vocabulary learning, especially structure-based production tasks (Ellis, 2003). Overall, they suggest an important role o…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1191/1362168806lr196oa

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies comparing TBLT and TSLT have been short term and/or methodologically flawed.

    “Unfortunately, most of the studies that have sought to compare TBLT and TSLT (e.g.De la Fuente, 2006;Laufer, 2006;Sheen, 2006) have been short term and/ or methodologically flawed.”

    From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as De la Fuente, 2006

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 45 · Cited by 240

Authors
de la Fuente, M. J.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University, USA,
Venue
Language Teaching Research
Published
2006-07
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
263-295
ISSN
  • 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0954
OpenAlex
W2103974034
Cited by
240
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 21
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
Keywords
second language vocabulary acquisition, task-based language learning, form-focused instruction, Spanish as a second language, word morphology, presentation-practice-production, proactive approach

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review