Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward
Open accessAbstract
The advocacy of task-based language teaching (TBLT) has met with resistance. The critiques of TBLT and the misconceptions that underlie them have already been addressed in Ellis (2009) and Long (2016). The purpose of this article is to move forward by examining a number of real problems that TBLT faces – such as how a ‘task’ should be defined, the nature and timing of the ‘focus-on-form’ required, how to determine task complexity and sequence tasks, the role of explicit instruction, the timing of focus on form and the teacher training needed to ensure effective uptake of TBLT – and to also consider what solutions are possible. Disagreements exist regarding the relative merits of task-based and task-supported language teaching. I will propose that a hybrid/modular syllabus that allows for a balance between an object-oriented and a tool-oriented view of language teaching offers the most promising way forward.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
11 of 104 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Transferability might appear in the use of specific linguistic features even if it is not visible in global measures.
“It is possible, however, that while transferability is not evident in these global measures it may become evident in the use of specific linguistic features (see, for example, Shintani & Ellis, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Shintani & Ellis, 2014 source
- Study design and conductnone given
Quinn (2014) was laboratory-based.
“This study was also laboratory-based.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Quinn (2014)
- Findingcitation
There is little discussion in TBLT about whether reactive focus on form must happen during a task or can be delayed until after it.
“There is little discussion of this in TBLT circles -but see Samuda (2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Samuda (2001)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
Research has usually examined intensive feedback aimed at one linguistic feature and elicited through focused tasks.
“Fourth, and perhaps most important, the research has typically investigated the effects of intensive feedback directed at a single linguistic feature (e.g.regular past tense) elicited by means of focused tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
There is very little experimental research on extensive feedback that addresses many linguistic problems as they arise during unfocused tasks.
“For obvious reasons, there has been very little experimental research that has investigated extensive feedback directed at a whole range of linguistic problems as these arise during the performance of unfocused tasks”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingcitation
There is a substantial body of good work on assessing the outcomes of task-based instruction.
“There is plenty of good work on assessing the outcomes of task-based instruction (see, for example, the special issues on task-based assessment in the special issue of Language Testing in 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites special issue of Language Testing in 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
When there is no intervention, transfer to a new task may not be found.
“However, in cases where there is no such intervention, transferability to a new task may not be found (see Ellis, 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ellis, 2009 source
- Findingnone given
When the treatment task includes an intervention such as corrective feedback, there is clear evidence of learning.
“In cases where the performance of the treatment task involves some kind of intervention (for example, corrective feedback) there is clear evidence of learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
In Li, Zhu and Ellis (2016), immediate feedback had some advantage over delayed feedback for learners with prior knowledge of the target structure.
“In this respect, immediate feedback showed some advantage over delayed feedback for those learners that has some prior knowledge of the target structure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li, Zhu and Ellis (2016) source
- Findingnone given
There is not enough research to decide whether feedback should be immediate or delayed.
“There is insufficient research to adjudicate on this issue.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
McDonough and Mackey (2006) found that primed repetition of recasts, occurring within six turns rather than immediately, was linked to L2 development.
“They found that what they called 'primed repetition' of the recasts (i.e.repetition that did not take place immediately following the recasts but within six turns) was associated with L2 development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McDonough and Mackey (2006) source
- Findingnone given
Very little research has examined delayed feedback in TBLT.
“There is, though very little research that has investigated delayed feedback in TBLT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
In McDonough and Mackey (2006), immediate repetition was not associated with L2 development.
“Immediate repetition was not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McDonough and Mackey (2006) source
- Findingcitation
Evaluations of TBLT show that it was unsuccessful in some contexts.
“It is easy to see how TBLT might run into problems and, indeed, evaluations of TBLT show that in some contexts it was not successful.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Teachers may lack confidence in their L2 proficiency and therefore feel unable to use tasks.
“Teachers may lack confidence in their L2 proficiency and thus feel that they cannot use tasks (Butler, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Butler, 2011 source
- Findingcitation
Carless (2004) found that tasks used by primary teachers in Hong Kong often became language practice rather than genuine communication.
“He found that the tasks used by primary school teachers in Hong Kong often ended up as 'language practice' rather than affording opportunities for genuine communication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Carless (2004) source
- Findingcitation
Teachers do focus on form during communicative tasks even when they believe they should not.
“In fact, teachers do focus on form during communicative tasks even when they believe they should not be doing so (Basturkmen, Loewen and Ellis (2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Basturkmen, Loewen and Ellis (2006)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Even speaking tasks can be carried out through teacher-class interaction.
“Even speaking tasks can be conducted through teacher-class interaction, as illustrated in Ellis, Basturkmen and Loewen (2001) and Loewen (2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingnone given
Experimental studies have often used tasks as pre- and post-tests to measure learning of specific linguistic forms from treatment tasks.
“Experimental studies have frequently used tasks as pre-and post-tests to measure the learning of specific linguistic forms that results from performing the treatment tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Task-repetition studies provide the clearest evidence of this lack of transfer.
“The clearest evidence of this can be found in task-repetition studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Task-repetition studies that included an intervention between performances have shown that learning can transfer to a new task.
“Also, task repetition studies that included some kind of intervention between performances of the task (e.g.explicit focus on specific linguistic forms) have shown that transfer of learning to a new task can occur (e.g.Hawkes, 2012;Baleghizadeh and Derakhshesh, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hawkes, 2012 source
- cites Baleghizadeh and Derakhshesh, 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Investigating the effect of task complexity necessarily involves one or more implementation options.
“My point is this; if we want to investigate the effect of task complexity we must necessarily involve one or more implementation options.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Nunan (1989) was the first to introduce the distinction between real-world tasks and pedagogic tasks.
“Nunan (1989) first introduced the distinction between 'real-world tasks' and 'pedagogic tasks'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nunan (1989)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premiseown data
Apart from planning time, Robinson's list of resource-directing and resource-dispersing variables contains no implementation variables.
“An inspection of Robinson's list of resource-directing and resource-dispersing variables reveals that apart from +/-planning there are no implementation variables.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Numerous implementation variables other than planning time can affect the difficulty of performing a task, such as performing a similar task first, listening to a model performance, brainstorming topic ideas, and pressure to perform rapidly.
“But there are numerous other implementation variables that can affect the difficulty of performing a taskfor example, asking the learners to perform a similar task first (Prabhu, 1987), asking learners to listen to a model performance of the task (Aston, 1982), brainstorming ideas relevant to the topic of the task (Skehan, 1996), and, +/pressure to perform the task rapidly (Yuan and Ellis, 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Prabhu, 1987
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Aston, 1982
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Skehan, 1996 source
- Interpretationreasoning
It is difficult and perhaps impossible to identify target tasks for some groups of learners.
“The main problem, however, is that it is difficult and perhaps impossible to identify target tasks for some groups of learners.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Learners have wants as well as needs.
- Premisecitation
Elaborative modification that makes input easier to comprehend by restructuring propositional content more clearly is more effective than simplification.
“Also relevant is research showing that modification consisting of elaboration that makes the comprehension of the input easier by restructuring the propositional content more clearly is more effective than simplification (Long and Ross, 1993).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Long and Ross, 1993
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Many misconceptions about TBLT have arisen because it is seen as necessarily involving speaking tasks.
“Many of the misconceptions about TBLT have arisen because it is seen as necessarily involving speaking tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The complexity of any single task depends not only on the design of the task workplan but also on how that workplan is implemented.
“The third problem is that the complexity of any single task will depend not just on the design of task workplan but also on how the workplan is implemented.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Focused tasks can be used to raise learners' awareness of the functional or semantic meanings of linguistic features.
“Focused tasks can be used to raise learners' awareness of the functional or semantic meanings of linguistic features as in Samuda's (2001) 'Things in Pocket' task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Samuda's (2001)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Greater attention is now being given to the role of input-based tasks in TBLT.
“Given the importance attached to input in all theories of L2 acquisition, there is an obvious need to give greater attention to the role of input-based tasks in TBLT and to some extent this is now happening (e.g.Shintani, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shintani, 2016 source
- Premisecitation
Studies investigating task conditions such as pre-task planning have produced more consistent results than studies of design features.
“and then goes on to argue that studies that have investigated the effect of task conditionssuch as pre-task planning -have produced more consistent results [2].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Skehan (2016) source
- Interpretationnone given
It cannot be assumed that a task designated as complex actually imposes a greater cognitive load.
“The first is that it cannot be assumed that a task designated as 'complex' actually entails a greater cognitive load.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Robinson's task sequence builds in planning time, which is an implementation variable.
“Robinson's task sequence does in fact take this into account as it builds in +/-planning time -clearly an implementation variable -into the task sequence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A needs-based approach to selecting tasks has the advantage of helping to ensure content relevance.
“There is an obvious advantage of such an approach as it helps to ensure content relevance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Sasayama's (2016) study showed that four narrative tasks predicted to vary in complexity did differ in the cognitive load they imposed.
“Her study showed that these tasks did indeed differ in the cognitive load they imposed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sasayama (2016) source
- Interpretationreasoning
The implementation variables in Sasayama's study may have affected the cognitive load learners experienced when performing the different tasks.
“These implementation variables may have affected the cognitive load the learners experienced when performing the different tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Consciousness-raising tasks provide opportunities for communicating when learners work together to solve the linguistic problems they pose.
“Furthermore, consciousness-raising tasks also provide opportunities for communicating if learners work together to 'solve' the linguistic problems they pose.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Robinson (2011) conflates design and implementation in his Cognition Hypothesis.
“Robinson (2011), however, conflates the two in his Cognition Hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Robinson (2011) source
- Premisecitation
Readability measures may also be relevant for determining the listenability of oral texts, because the cognitive processes involved in reading and listening are not modality specific.
“Readability measures may also be relevant for determining the listenability of oral texts as research has shown that the cognitive processes involved in reading and listening are not modality specific but rather draw on unimodal cortical regions of the brain (Jobard et al, 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jobard et al, 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Output-based tasks are needed to develop higher levels of proficiency.
“Outputbased tasks are needed to develop higher levels of proficiency (Swain, 1985).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Swain, 1985
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The complexity of a task can never be considered separately from how the task is implemented.
“In effect, the complexity of a task can never be considered separately from how the task is implemented.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Sasayama's study found task variables other than those built into the design of her tasks, such as code complexity, that affected the cognitive load of the tasks.
“Sasayama's study found that there were task variables (such as code complexity) other than those built into the design of her tasks that affected the cognitive load of the tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sasayama
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
There has been surprisingly little research on whether prior explicit instruction affects how a task is performed.
“Again, there has been surprisingly little research that has addressed this question.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
The six types of corrective feedback identified by Lyster and Ranta (1997) in immersion classrooms informed the considerable body of experimental research that followed.
“The 6 types of corrective feedback that Lyster and Ranta (1997) identified in their study of immersion classrooms has informed the considerable body of experimental research that followed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lyster and Ranta (1997) source
- Interpretationnone given
The relative effects of different types of corrective feedback depend on context, so one type may work better in one setting and another in a different setting.
“First, the relative effects of different types of feedback are contextually constrained; thus one type may be more effective in one context and another in a different context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
There has been almost no research examining pre-emptive focus on form.
“There has been almost no research that has examined preemptive focus on form.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The studies by Day and Shapson and by Harley investigated the effects of direct instruction on grammatical structures that previous research had shown immersion learners typically fail to acquire.
“In fact, it was precisely this aim that motivated the studies by Day and Shapson and Harley, who investigated the effects of direct instruction on grammatical structures that previous research had shown immersion learners typically fail to acquire.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Day and Shapson
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Harley
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
If explicit instruction interferes with task performance, then tasks in TSLT do not function as they do in TBLT.
“If it does interfere, then clearly tasks in TSLT are not functioning as they do in TBLT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Theoretical disagreements about input-providing versus output-prompting and implicit versus explicit feedback seem to be decreasing.
“The theoretical controversies concerning the relative merits of input-providing versus outputprompting and implicit versus explicit feedback appear to be abating.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Research has concerned itself almost entirely with reactive focus on form.
“Research has concerned itself almost entirely with reactive focus on form (see, for example, the corrective feedback studies).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Most studies comparing TBLT and TSLT have been short term and/or methodologically flawed.
“Unfortunately, most of the studies that have sought to compare TBLT and TSLT (e.g.De la Fuente, 2006;Laufer, 2006;Sheen, 2006) have been short term and/ or methodologically flawed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Loewen (2005) reported that successful uptake was the most significant variable predicting learning as measured in tailor-made tests of the linguistic forms addressed during the form-focused episodes.
“Successful uptake, of course, cannot be equated with acquisition but in another study Loewen (2005) reported that successful uptake was the most significant variable predicting learning as measured in tailor-made tests of those linguistic forms that were addressed during the FFEs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Loewen (2005) source
- Premisecitation
Both pre-emptive and reactive form-focused episodes can occur frequently in task-based teaching.
“This study shows that both pre-emptive and reactive FFEs can occur frequently in task-based teaching.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
TSLT might still have a place in helping learners acquire linguistic features that are not learned naturally.
“TSLT might still have a place in helping learners acquire those linguistic features that are not learned 'naturally'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Combining feedback strategies in this way is likely to make the feedback explicit and therefore more noticeable to learners.
“Combining strategies in this way is likely to make the feedback explicit and therefore more salient to learners.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Two studies examining the effect of explicit instruction on task performance have produced different results.
“Two studies that have examined the effect explicit instruction has on the performance of a task have produced different results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The question of whether one approach is more effective or efficient in the long term cannot be answered until well-designed longitudinal comparative studies exist.
“This question cannot be answered until we have well-designed, longitudinal comparative studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Feedback strategies can be combined for a single error, as in corrective recasts where a repetition is followed by a recast if the repetition does not lead to successful uptake.
“Third, it is possible to combine different strategies when addressing a particular error; in 'corrective recasts' (Doughty and Varela, 1998) where errors are first corrected by means of a repetition (i.e.output-prompting) and then by means of a recast (i.e.input-providing) if the repetition did not result in successful uptake.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Doughty and Varela, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Li and Ellis (forthcoming) found that learners who received explicit instruction in the past passive were more likely to try to use it when performing tasks than learners who did not receive that instruction.
“In the second study, Li and Ellis (forthcoming), also found that learners who had received explicit instruction in the target structure (past passive) were more likely to try to use it when they performed the tasks than learners who did not receive this instruction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li and Ellis (forthcoming)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
TSLT can at least result in the ability to deploy the target of instruction in unplanned language use.
“What is clear, however, is that TSLT can, at least, result in the ability to deploy the target of instruction in unplanned language use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The nature of the task matters, since some tasks are more likely than others to lead to negotiation of meaning and focus on form.
“Of course, much depends on the nature of the tasks the learners perform, with some tasks more likely to lead to the negotiation of meaning and a focus on form than others.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The pedagogical advice that teachers should not correct learners during fluency work is unjustified.
“It is clear, however, that the pedagogic advice that teachers should desist from correcting learners in fluency work has no warrant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Research on a single task performance cannot demonstrate that development is occurring.
“But research that focuses on the one-off performance of a task cannot show that development is taking place.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Tasks can be done in various participatory structures, including teacher-class and individual work.
“But tasks can be performed in a variety of participatory structures, including teacher-classas is necessary with input-based tasksand individually when learners work by themselves”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Teachers can choose among participatory structures in TBLT.
“Teachers have a choice of participatory structures in TBLT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
There is an apparent conflict between teacher-guide advice and the position explicit or implicit in TBLT theory.
“Thus, there is an apparent conflict in the position taken by authors of teacher guides and the position explicit or implicit in theoretical accounts of TBLT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Focus on form may be limited during group work.
“There is also the problem that focus on form may be limited in group work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
These assessment problems are more severe for speaking tasks.
“These problems are more acute with speaking assessment tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
For such features, explicit instruction is necessary.
“For such features explicit instruction is necessary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Task-based language teaching and task-supported language teaching with explicit instruction and focused tasks are not incompatible but mutually supporting.
“Nor do I see task-based language teaching and task-supported language teaching involving explicit instruction and focused tasks as incompatible but rather as mutually supporting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Redundant, non-salient and complex features, especially when blocked by the learner's L1, are unlikely to be acquired even with focus on form.
“Redundant, non-salient and complex features, especially when these are 'blocked' by the learner's L1, are unlikely to be acquired even with the help of focus on form.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Not all linguistic features can be acquired incidentally and implicitly through task-based teaching.
“Not all linguistic features can be acquired incidentally and implicitly through task-based teaching.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 97
- May combine two claims. 48
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLong questioned whether metalinguistic knowledge gained at one time can be used by the learner at another time, as Swan claimed.
“but he also questioned whether metalinguistic knowledge acquired at one time can be used by the learner at another timeas Swan claimed can happen.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Long (2016) source
In §2.3, Long says it would be “patently absurd” to suppose that metalinguistic knowledge provided at Time 1 could never be used at Time 2. He questions the long-term benefit in Swan’s example and says such knowledge is usually of limited value, but does not question whether later use is possible. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Swan
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe critiques directed at TBLT rest on misunderstandings, concern non-issues, and have already been adequately answered in prior work.
“The critiques levelled at TBLT are based on “misunderstandings” about TBLT and concern “non-issues” and have already been adequately addressed (see Ellis, 2009;Long, 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Ellis, 2009 source
- cites Long, 2016 source
The Abstract says most of the 14 criticisms are nonissues, and section 3.1 calls one criticism a misunderstanding. But the Abstract and Conclusion also acknowledge that some criticisms raise important matters, and the passages do not establish that the critiques had already been adequately answered in prior work. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMore recent readability measures also take account of discourse factors such as cohesion and coherence.
“However, in more recent work (e.g.Pitler and Nenkova, 2008) measures that also take account of discourse factors such as cohesion and coherence have been developed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Pitler and Nenkova, 2008 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLong (2016) produced his own list of real issues, covering only items 3, 9 and 10 of the author's Table 1, based on his particular conception of TBLT.
“Long (2016), in an issue of the Annual Review of Applied Linguistics devoted to TBLT, produced his own list of 'real issues' (only #3, 9 and 10 in Table 1) based on his particular view of what constitutes TBLT .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Long (2016) source
Section 5, “Tasks and TBLT: Some Real Issues,” says Long will mention three real issues, and the paper defines the conception of TBLT he uses. Our copy cannot establish whether those issues correspond only to items 3, 9 and 10 of the citing author's Table 1. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationResearchers have investigated the relative effects of input-providing versus output-prompting feedback, and of implicit versus explicit feedback.
“Some researchers (e.g.Lyster, 2004;Ammar and Spada, 2006) investigated the relative effects of input-providing feedback (e.g.recasts) versus output-prompting feedback (e.g.clarification requests, metalinguistic feedback and elicitation).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLong (2016) stated that acquisition does not occur only online during communication.
“Long (2016) pointed out that that this is not the case”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Long (2016) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGoo and Mackey (2013) argue for carefully designed studies investigating the effects of narrowly prescribed types of corrective feedback.
“Goo and Mackey (2013), for example, argue for carefully designed studies that investigate the effects of narrowly prescribed types of corrective feedback.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Goo and Mackey (2013) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLong stressed that focus on form must be reactive.
“What Long emphasized is that focus on form must be reactive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Long (2016) source
Section 2.1 describes focus on form in TBLT as reactive and often triggered by task work. But it does not say it must always be reactive; section 2.5 also allows teachers or task designers to deliberately direct attention to language during meaning-focused use. The claim turns a description into an absolute requirement. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSome progress has been made in measuring explicit and implicit knowledge separately, although problems remain.
“Some progress has been made (see, for example, Ellis, 2005) although problems still remain (see Suzuki and DeKeyser, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationComplexity, accuracy and fluency improve when a task is repeated, but this improvement does not appear to transfer to a new task.
“Complexity, accuracy and fluency improve when the task is repeated but this improvement does not seem to transfer to the performance of a new task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationErlam (2016) found that tasks teachers designed in an in-service programme did not fully match a definition of a task.
“Erlam (2016) found that the tasks she asked teachers to design in an in-service programme did not fully match up to a definition of a 'task' [5].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Erlam (2016) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationCarless (2004) noted that teachers do not always have a clear idea of what a task is.
“A particular problem noted by Carless (2004) is that teachers do not always have a clear idea of what a 'task' is.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Carless (2004) source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn Li, Zhu and Ellis (2016), both immediate and delayed feedback groups improved in accuracy, while the no-feedback group did not.
“Both the immediate and delayed feedback groups showed gains in accuracy whereas the no-feedback group did not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li, Zhu and Ellis (2016) source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn Quinn (2014), both immediate and delayed feedback groups improved significantly in accurate use of English passive constructions, with no difference between them.
“There were statistically significant improvements in the accurate use of the target structure (English passive constructions) in both the immediate and delayed feedback groups but no difference between them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Quinn (2014)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationIn Erlam (2016), teachers tended to design tasks with prior presentation of language, reflecting their existing ideas about what a task should do.
“In particular, the teachers tended to design tasks that involved the prior presentation of language reflecting their pre-existing ideas of what a task should do.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Erlam (2016) source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationSwain's research provides strong evidence that language-related episodes occur during tasks and that learning results, especially when the problems in those episodes are resolved successfully.
“Swain's research (e.g. Swain, 1998) also provides convincing evidence that language-related episodes arise as learners perform tasks and that learning results especially if the problems that these episodes address are resolved successfully.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Swain, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn Quinn (2014), the no-feedback condition also improved similarly, suggesting that gains came from simply doing the task.
“However, in this study the no feedback condition also resulted in similar levels of improvement suggesting that gains resulted from simply performing the task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Quinn (2014)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationAdams' own study found that learners gave each other feedback during opinion-gap and information-gap tasks and that this led to both grammar and vocabulary learning.
“Adams' own study found that learners did provide each other with feedback when performing opinion-gap and information-gap tasks and that it resulted in both grammar and vocabulary learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Adams
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFrom the author's experience, teachers often ask how to assess students in TBLT when there are no explicit linguistic targets.
“However, from my own experience teachers often ask how they assess students in TBLT when there are no explicit linguistic targets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenThere is a lack of discussion about what participatory structure is appropriate for different groups of students.
“What is lacking is any discussion about what constitutes an appropriate participatory structure for different groups of students.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn Li, Zhu and Ellis (2016), gains appeared only on a grammaticality judgement test, not on an elicited oral imitation test, suggesting the feedback produced only explicit knowledge.
“However, the gains were only evident in a grammaticality judgement test, not in an elicited oral imitation test, suggesting that the feedback only resulted in explicit knowledge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li, Zhu and Ellis (2016) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
FindingreasoningMisconceptions about TBLT are widespread.
“Misconceptions about TBLT abound.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenTo date, very little research has examined how effective teacher education or training programmes are in helping teachers implement TBLT.
“However, to date, there has been very little research investigating the how effective teacher education/ training programmes are in enabling teachers to implement TBLT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThere is plenty of evidence that explicit instruction involving focused tasks is effective.
“There is plenty of evidence to show that explicit instruction involving focused tasks is effective.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThere is disagreement about the relative merits of task-based and task-supported language teaching.
“Disagreements exist regarding the relative merits of task-based and task-supported language teaching.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningMeasuring the learning that results from unfocused tasks is difficult and has rarely been undertaken.
“Measuring the learning that results from unfocused tasks is difficult and, in fact, has been rarely undertaken.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationReal-world tasks aim at situational authenticity because they are based on target tasks performed outside the classroom.
“Real-world tasks aim at situational authenticity as they are based on the target tasks performed in the outside world.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bachman and Palmer, 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenDetermining input complexity is relevant for all tasks that incorporate linguistic input in the task materials.
“Determining input complexity is relevant for all tasks that incorporate linguistic input in the task materials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationCourse designers and materials writers need reliable criteria for determining task complexity.
“Long is right as course designers and materials writers do need reliable criteria for determining task complexity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenReliable criteria for determining task complexity do not currently exist, and what is needed is not just a list of putative design variables but a theory of how the variables interact.
“However we do not currently have such criteria and we need not just a list of putative design variables but a theory of how the variables interact to determine complexity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAlternative versions of TBLT are possible and are necessary in order to accommodate different instructional contexts.
“My list is longer, reflecting my view that alternative versions of TBLT are possible and indeed are necessary to accommodate different instructional contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationConsciousness-raising tasks have no place in Long's version of TBLT, where all tasks must address functional needs.
“Consciousness-raising tasks, however, clearly do not have a place in Long's version of TBLT where all tasks must address functional needs although an exception might be in a task-based programme for linguists!”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenInput-based tasks are easily conducted with the whole class, which makes them well-suited to large classes and to teachers used to lockstep teaching.
“Input-based tasks are easily conducted with the whole class making them well-suited to large classes and to teachers more used to teaching in lockstep.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenTask complexity matters for syllabus design if one accepts that there should be a progression from simple to complex.
“The issue of task complexity is important for syllabus design if one accepts the basic premise that there should be a progression from 'simple' to 'complex'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: A task-based syllabus should progress from simple to complex.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenLanguage can be made the topic of talk just like any other topic.
“After all, one can make language the topic of talk just like any other topic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningInput-based tasks are useful for introducing task-based teaching to learners accustomed to a more traditional structural approach who may resist treating language as a tool.
“Input-based tasks are also useful for introducing taskbased teaching to learners who are accustomed to a more traditional, structural approach and who may be resistant to a mode of teaching that requires them to treat language as a tool rather than as an object.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenTasks are holistic and thus involve conglomerates of factors.
“The secondand to my mind the more serious problem -is that tasks are holistic and thus involve conglomerates of factors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenExplicit knowledge of specific features that are problematic for learners might facilitate attention to those features in subsequent input and output.
“Again, I do not envisage that such tasks should comprise a complete programme but see them as a means for developing explicit knowledge of specific features that are problematic to learners on the grounds that such knowledge might facilitate attention to these features in subsequent input and output.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Certain linguistic features constitute learning problems that persist even at advanced stages of proficiency.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA needs-based approach is not always appropriate, and it is questionable whether tasks should be defined as target tasks for all L2 learners.
“Bachman (2002), in a discussion of task-based assessment also questioned whether tasks should be defined as target tasks for all L2 learners and argued that a needs-based approach is not always appropriate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bachman (2002) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSituational authenticity is not particularly relevant when the purpose is to assess the communicative abilities of general purpose learners.
“He saw situational authenticity as not particularly relevant when the purpose is to assess the communicative abilities of general purpose learners.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bachman (2002) source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRobinson's Cognition Hypothesis, particularly the Task Complexity factors of his Triadic Componential Framework, is the most developed framework for sequencing tasks from simple to complex and has attracted the most research.
“The most developed framework for sequencing tasks from simple to complexand the one that has attracted the most research -is Robinson's (2001;2011) Cognition Hypothesis, in particular those factors in his Triadic Componential Framework relating to Task Complexity, which he claims provide “a parsimonious way to sequence L2 tasks in a program of instruction” (2011; 10).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Robinson (2001;2011)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFocused tasks have a place both in a language programme and in research designed to inform pedagogy.
“In Ellis (2003), however, I argued that focused tasks have a place in both a language programme and in research designed to inform pedagogy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ellis (2003) source
- Rests on an assumption: Certain linguistic features constitute learning problems that persist even at advanced stages of proficiency.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFor written input there are standard measures of readability, such as the Dale-Chall formula.
“In the case of written input there are standard measures of readability, for example, the Dale-Chall formula (1948).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dale-Chall formula (1948)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFocused tasks allow for intensive corrective feedback directed at a target structure, and such feedback is effective.
“They allow for intensive corrective feedback directed at a target structure and, as is now well-established, such feedback is effective (Lyster, Saito and Sato, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lyster, Saito and Sato, 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationA clear distinction should be made between design and implementation variables, and a task, being a workplan, should be specified solely in terms of its design features.
“My proposal is that a clear distinction should be made between design and implementation variables and that 'task' is a workplan and so should be specified solely in terms of its design features.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe issues in designing and implementing TBLT courses often reflect differing positions among TBLT advocates, which suggests a need for debate and, if possible, consensus.
“In many cases, these issues concern different positions among advocates of TBLT, suggesting the need to debate them and, if possible, arrive at some consensus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningA theory of task complexity must take account of the conditions under which a task is to be performed.
“Above all, we need to recognize that such a theory must also take account of the conditions under which a task is to be performed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationClear differences in cognitive load were evident only between the least and the most complex task, suggesting that fine gradations do not affect actual task complexity.
“However, clear differences were only evident between the least and the most complex task, suggesting that fine gradations do not impact on the actual complexity of tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sasayama (2016) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenDeveloping a task-based syllabus involves both vertical and horizontal sequencing of tasks.
“Finally, developing a task-based syllabus involves both the vertical and horizontal sequencing of tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSkehan concludes that design features do not generate consistency or robust generalizations and that putative manipulations of task complexity may not in reality produce different levels of complexity.
“While he does not reject the impact that design features can have on performance, he concludes that “they do not generate consistency or robust generalizations” (p.37) and that “putative manipulations of task complexity may not in reality produce different levels of complexity” (p.40)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Skehan (2016) source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningInput-based tasks are needed for beginners, who lack the resources to produce in the L2, and they supply comprehensible input that helps learners get started in learning an L2.
“Input-based tasks are needed for beginners, who lack the resources to produce in the L2; they provide learners with the comprehensible input that helps get them started in learning an L2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIt is difficult to see how a task can be designed based solely on two of the many factors that make up the resource-directing and resource-dispersion variables in Robinson's model.
“It is difficult to see how a task can be designed based solely on two of the many factors [1] that comprise the resource directing and resource-dispersion variables in Robinson's model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationOutput-based tasks provide greater opportunities for negotiation of meaning and of form, which have been shown to promote L2 acquisition.
“They provide greater opportunities for the negotiation of meaning (Long, 1996) and of form (Lyster, 2001), which have been shown to promote L2 acquisition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSkehan (2016) makes a clear distinction between design and implementation options.
“Skehan (2016) makes a clear distinction between design and implementation options.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Skehan (2016) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningA pedagogic task lacks situational authenticity but aims at interactional authenticity.
“A pedagogic task lacks situational authenticity but aims at interactional authenticity (i.e. the kind of natural language processing found in communication in the world outside the classroom).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningRobinson's work on task complexity appears to be primarily concerned with horizontal sequencing, but vertical sequencing also needs to be considered.
“Robinson's work on task complexity appears to be primarily concerned with horizontal sequencing but clearly we also need to consider vertical sequencing as well.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenOlder readability measures were limited because they were based only on vocabulary level and sentence length.
“A limitation of these older measures is that they were based on vocabulary level and sentence length only.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenWhether tasks are defined as real-life tasks with both situational and interactional authenticity or as pedagogic tasks with only interactional authenticity must depend on the instructional context.
“Whether tasks are to be defined as real-life tasks that have both situational and interactional authenticity or as pedagogic tasks that have interactional authenticity but no situational authenticity must surely depend on the instructional context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIn the pure TBLT promoted by Long, there is no room for explicit instruction preceding the performance of a task.
“In 'pure' TBLTthe kind that Long (2015) promotesthere is no room for explicit instruction preceding the performance of a task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Long (2015)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe main problem for task complexity arises in determining the complexity of output tasks.
“The main problem arises when it comes to determining the complexity of output tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenA focused task must satisfy the same criteria as an unfocused task.
“A focused task, of course, must satisfy the same criteria as an unfocused task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenLittle progress on task complexity is likely until some fundamental issues have been addressed.
“To my mind, however, little progress is likely until some fundamental issues have been addressed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlthough TBLT advocates acknowledge that both input-based and output-based tasks have a role, TBLT is nearly always discussed and researched in terms of output-based tasks.
“Advocates of TBLT acknowledge that both input-based and output-based tasks have a role to play but, in fact, TBLT is nearly always discussed and researched in terms of output-based tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA needs-based syllabus is not feasible for young foreign language learners.
“Cameron (2001), for example, argued that a needs-based syllabus is not feasible for young foreign language learners.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cameron (2001) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThere are established ways of determining the complexity of input.
“There are established ways of determining the complexity of input.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenExisting typologies of task types lack a principled way of classifying tasks.
“What is lacking is a principled way of classifying such tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThis typology of corrective feedback strategies has provided a basis for making and testing theory-based claims about the efficacy of different types of feedback.
“This typology of corrective feedback strategies has provided a basis for making and testing theory-based claims about the efficacy of different types of feedback.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenBoth focus on form and focus on forms can result in the kind of L2 knowledge, implicit or automatized explicit, that enables learners to communicate fluently and accurately.
“If we accept that both focus on form and focus on forms can result in the kind of L2 knowledge (implicit or automatized explicit knowledge) that enables learners to communicate fluently and accuratelyand there is plenty of evidence to support thisthen we still need to ask whether, in the long term, one approach is more effective or efficient than the other.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningImmediate online focus on form seems preferable because of the psycholinguistic importance of learning through interaction and because TBLT research has studied it.
“It would seem that immediate, online focus on form is preferred given the psycholinguistic importance attached to learning-through-interaction and the fact that the TBLT research has investigated this.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationTaken together, the two studies suggest that reactive focus on form facilitates learning and that pre-emptive focus on form, especially when student-initiated, is beneficial.
“Taken, together, these two studies suggest that, as Long claims, reactive focus on form facilitates learning, but also that preemptive focus on form, especially when initiated by students, is beneficial.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationImplicit feedback caters to implicit learning, whereas explicit feedback is more likely to result in the conscious attention to form that Schmidt saw as important for acquisition and explicit learning.
“Theoretical arguments can also be made for implicit and explicit feedback; implicit feedback caters to implicit learning whereas explicit feedback is more likely to result in the conscious attention to form that Schmidt (2001) saw as important for acquisition and explicit learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schmidt (2001) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThe two dimensions of feedback intersect, so each feedback strategy can be classified as input-providing or output-prompting and as implicit or explicit.
“These two dimensions of feedback intersect so each feedback strategy can be classified in terms of whether it is input-providing or output-prompting and implicit or explicit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAn obvious way to facilitate intentional initial perception of new forms in the input is through explicit instruction.
“An obvious way to achieve this is through explicit instruction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLong now regards explicit grammar rules as acceptable when they respond to problems arising during communication.
“He currently considers the provision of explicit grammar rules as legitimate so long as this occurs in response to problems that arise during communication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Long, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningWhether and to what extent explicit instruction interferes with how a task is performed is an important issue for TSLT.
“Whether and to what extent explicit instruction 'interferes' in the way a task is performed is an important issues for TSLT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Li and Ellis's study, the explicit instruction group produced language that was less complex and fluent and that also tended to be less accurate overall.
“In this study, however, the explicit instruction did have an effect on global complexity, accuracy and fluency with the explicit instruction group producing language that was less complex and fluent and that also tended to be less accurate overall.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li and Ellis
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMochizuki and Ortega (2008) found that a group given a hand-out with explicit information about English relative clauses produced more than twice as many relative clauses in a focused task as a group without the hand-out, with no difference between groups in global complexity and fluency.
“Mochizuki and Ortega (2008) reported that a group that received a hand-out providing explicit information about English relative clauses produced more than twice as many relative clauses when they performed the focused task than a group that did not receive the hand-out but that there was no difference in the global complexity and fluency of the production of the two groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mochizuki and Ortega (2008) source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLong's earlier support for recasts as implicit feedback is less visible in his later work, partly because he now views feedback as serving both intentional and incidental learning.
“Long's early commitment to recasts as an implicit form of feedback (see Long, 1996;2006) is less evident in his later publications (Long, 2015) in part because he now sees feedback as catering to intentional learning as well as to incidental learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Long, 1996;2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Long, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIt would be unwise to dismiss pre-emptive focus on form.
“Given that students (adult ones at least) tend to naturally topicalize problematic linguistic points during the performance of a task it would seem unwise to dismiss preemptive focus on form.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Students, at least adult ones, tend to naturally topicalize problematic linguistic points during the performance of a task.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPreparatory Attention and Memory Theory also claims that learners performing a difficult task realize they lack crucial information and are more likely to attend to it when it later becomes available.
“This theory also claims that when learners perform a difficult task they will realize they lack crucial information and thus are more likely to pay attention to this information when it is subsequently made available to them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Quinn (2014)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationEllis, Basturkmen and Loewen (2001) distinguished pre-emptive and reactive form-focused episodes occurring in task-based lessons.
“Ellis, Basturkmen and Loewen (2001) distinguished pre-emptive and reactive form-focused episodes (FFEs) that occurred in task-based lessons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ellis, Basturkmen and Loewen (2001) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenDelayed feedback remains reactive if it addresses linguistic problems that arose during task performance.
“It is worth noting, though, that delayed feedback is still 'reactive' as long as it addresses linguistic problems that arose during the performance of the task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn task-supported language teaching, specific linguistic forms are first taught explicitly and then practised in real operating conditions using tasks.
“In contrast, in task-supported language teaching (TSLT), specific linguistic forms are first taught explicitly and then practised in “real operating conditions” using tasks (DeKeyser, 1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites DeKeyser, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLong supports using a range of feedback strategies, a position also taken by Ellis (2009) and Lyster and Ranta (2013).
“In other words, he advocates a variety of feedback strategiesa view echoed by Ellis (2009) and Lyster and Ranta (2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ellis (2009) source
- cites Lyster and Ranta (2013)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenReactive focus on form mainly consists of corrective feedback.
“Reactive focus on form mainly consists of corrective feedback.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPreparatory Attention and Memory Theory proposes that learning improves when attention is complete rather than divided among multiple goals.
“Quinn (2014), drew on Preparatory Attention and Memory Theory, which proposes that learning is enhanced when complete attention is available rather than divided between multiple goals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Quinn (2014)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSuccessful uptake was more likely to occur in learner-initiated pre-emptive and in reactive form-focused episodes than in teacher-initiated pre-emptive episodes.
“They reported that successful uptake was more likely to occur in learner-initiated pre-emptive and in reactive FFEs than in teacher-initiated pre-emptive FFEs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ellis, Basturkmen and Loewen (2001) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenTeachers are likely to use a range of feedback strategies naturally rather than relying on only one type.
“Second, teachers are likely to quite naturally employ a variety of strategies rather than stick to a single type”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEven if tasks in TSLT result in better learning of the target structure, they will not provide the same opportunities for natural language use and may in the long term be less successful in developing all-round L2 proficiency.
“Even if they result in better learning of the target structure, they will not provide the same opportunities for natural language use and thus, in the long term, may be less successful in developing all round proficiency in the L2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationOf the 448 form-focused episodes identified in 12 hours of teaching, 165 were student-initiated pre-emptive, 41 were teacher-initiated pre-emptive, and 223 were reactive.
“In the 448 FFEs Ellis et al identified in 12 hours of teaching, 165 were student-initiated pre-emptive FFEs, 41 pre-emptive teacher-initiated FFEs and 223 reactive FFEs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ellis et al
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationA common pedagogical recommendation is that feedback should be immediate in accuracy work but delayed in fluency work.
“a common position in the pedagogical advice given to teachers is that feedback should be immediate in accuracy work but delayed in fluency work (Hedge, 2000;Scrivener, 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hedge, 2000
- cites Scrivener, 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLong (2006) claimed that recasts are more likely to promote acquisition because they provide positive input for new features, and disputed whether uptake of feedback has any utility.
“Long (2006), however, claimed that recasts are more likely to promote acquisition as they provide learners with positive input for 'new' features and disputed whether the uptake of feedback has any utility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Long (2006)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenResearch indicates that recasts tend to be the most common feedback in meaning-focused interaction elicited by tasks.
“although research does suggest that recasts tend to predominate in the meaning-focused interactions that tasks elicit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIt is notoriously difficult to devise tests that provide separate measures of explicit and implicit knowledge.
“This question is notoriously difficult to address given the difficulty in devising tests that afford separate measures of explicit and implicit knowledge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTSLT's ability to result in unplanned use occurs only when massive practice of the target feature is provided, which is not feasible if teachers must cover all the linguistic features listed in the syllabus.
“Long does not deny this but argues that it only occurs when massive practice of the target feature found such as that found in Day and Shapson (1994) and Harley (1989) is provided, which he suggests is not feasible if teachers need to cover all the linguistic features listed in the syllabus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Day and Shapson (1994)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Harley (1989) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationKey features of successful innovation include teacher dissatisfaction with current practice, feasibility in context, match with student needs, ease of understanding principles and procedures, required originality, and teacher ownership.
“These included the teacher's dissatisfaction his/her current practice, the feasibility of the new approach in the particular context in which the teacher works, the extent to which the new approach is seen as matching the needs of the students, how easy the principles and procedures of the new approach are to grasp, the extent to which teachers are required to demonstrate a high degree of original”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ellis (1997)
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrabhu (1987) recognized that a new pedagogy is an unsettling intruder into teachers' mental frames because it conflicts with old perceptions and threatens routines and security.
“A new perception of pedagogy, implying a different pattern of classroom activity, is an intruder into teachers' mental framesan unsettling one, because there is a conflict of mismatch between the old and new perceptions and, more seriously a threat to prevailing routines and to the sense of security dependent on them.(p.105).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Prabhu (1987)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationQuinn (2014) randomly assigned 90 intermediate adult ESL learners to immediate, delayed, and no-feedback conditions.
“In Quinn (2014) 90 intermediate-level adult ESL learners were randomly assigned to immediate, delayed and no feedback conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Quinn (2014)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenGroup work may not be the best way to introduce TBLT to students whose prior instruction was only traditional lockstep teaching.
“I have also argued that using group work may not be the best way to introduce students to TBLT if their previous experience of classroom instruction consisted only of traditional, lockstep teaching.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenLongitudinal studies are needed to establish transferability.
“Again, to establish transferability longitudinal studies are needed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenTBLT aims at integrative, holistic learning and cannot be assessed with discrete-point tests, which would also harm teaching through negative washback.
“TBLT is directed at integrative, holistic learning and cannot be assessed through discrete-point tests, which if used would also have a negative wash-back effect on teaching.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenInput-based tasks are easier to assess by checking whether learners achieve the task outcome.
“Input-based tasks can be assessed more easily in terms of whether learners achieve the outcome of the task (e.g. can correctly draw in the route described on a map).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenSuch studies were generally conducted in laboratory settings and with intermediate or advanced learners.
“However, in general studies such as these were carried out in a laboratory setting and with intermediate or advanced level learners.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenTBLT, with its focus on holistic teaching and learning by doing, is a major innovation for many teachers.
“TBLT, with its emphasis on holistic teaching and learning-through-doing constitutes a major innovation for many teachers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationLi, Zhu and Ellis (2016) conducted a classroom-based study.
“Li, Zhu and Ellis (2016) reported a classroom-based study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li, Zhu and Ellis (2016) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAdams (2007) concluded that learner-learner interaction may offer a site for feedback, but the limited range of feedback types may not meet learners' developmental needs.
“while learner-learner interactions may provide a site for feedback to occur, the restricted set of feedback types may not provide evidence appropriate to learner developmental needs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Adams (2007)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThis misconception may have arisen because much research has studied learners performing tasks in pairs or groups.
“This misconception may again have arisen because so much of the research has investigated how learners perform tasks in pairs or groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningMore evidence is needed on how common and facilitative focus on form is in different participatory structures.
“More evidence is needed to show how far focus on form is common and facilitative of learning in different participatory structures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenStudents may not be convinced that the incidental learning TBLT provides is the most efficient way to learn an L2.
“Students may be unconvinced that the incidental learning that TBLT caters to is the most efficient way of learning an L2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationVan den Branden's (2006) account of implementing TBLT in Flanders provides an excellent model of successful introduction.
“An excellent model of how TBLT can be successfully introduced can be found in Van den Branden's (2006) account of its implementation in Flanders (Belgium).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van den Branden's (2006)
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIt is unreasonable to expect beginner learners to do speaking tasks in groups because they lack proficiency and will use L1 or produce restricted, pidgin-like output.
“As I mentioned above, it is not reasonable to expect beginner-level learners to perform speaking tasks in groups as they lack the necessary proficiency and thus will resort to their L1 or else produce the kind of restricted, pidgin-like output that Seedhouse (1999) was critical of.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Seedhouse (1999)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningA common misconception about TBLT is that it must involve small group work.
“A common misconception about TBLT is that it must involve small group work.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe benefits of small group work are well documented.
“The advantages of small group work are well-documentedsee, for example, Long and Porter (1985).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Long and Porter (1985)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe primed repetition in McDonough and Mackey (2006) could be considered closer to an immediate than a delayed response.
“However, it could be argued that the 'primed repetition' in this study was closer to an immediate than a delayed response.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McDonough and Mackey (2006) source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn TBLT the accuracy-fluency distinction does not apply because the aim is to develop both together.
“In TBLT, however, the distinction between accuracy and fluency work does not apply as the goal is to develop accuracy and fluency contiguously.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThere is tension in TBLT between the claim that tasks promote effective learning and the actual demonstration that what is learned transfers to a new task.
“There is a tension in TBLT circles between the emphasis on how tasks can promote and effective learning and the actual demonstration of this in terms of the transferability of whatever is learned to a new task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenA needs-analysis approach is not feasible in contexts such as the state educational systems in East Asia that the author knows.
“I have argued such an approach is not feasible in contexts such as the state educational systems in East Asia that I am familiar with.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe author has argued for a hybrid syllabus with a main task-based component supported by a task-supported component to address persistent linguistic problems when they appear.
“It is for this reason that I have argued for a hybrid syllabus consisting primarily of a task-based component but supported by a task-supported component to address recalcitrant linguistic problems when these become evident.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe final real issue is how to design courses that are task-based but also include opportunities to work on specific linguistic problems through task-supported teaching.
“To my mind, then, the final 'real issue' that has to be addressed is how to design courses that are task-based but that also build in, where needed, opportunities for working on specific linguistic problems through task-supported teaching.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationCritics of TBLT are unlikely to be convinced until there are more studies like Shintani (2016), which provided evidence that TBLT can be more effective than traditional structural teaching.
“Critics of TBLT are unlikely to be convinced until there are more studies like Shintani (2016), who produced evidence that TBLT can be more effective than traditional, structural teaching.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shintani (2016) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationLong's version of TBLT stresses needs-analysis to identify target tasks relevant to a specific learner group.
“Whereas Long's version of TBLT emphasizes the importance of needs-analysis to identify the target tasks relevant to a specific group of learners”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Long
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSuccessful L2 acquisition requires incidental learning through task-based teaching but can also benefit from the skill development that task-supported teaching offers.
“Successful L2 acquisition clearly does call for learning incidentally through task-based teaching but it can also benefit from the skill-development that task-supported teaching can provide.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenDoubts about TBLT will continue until it is shown to be effective not only in communicative ability but also in linguistic accuracy.
“Doubts will also continue to exist until it can be shown that TBLT is effectivenot just in developing communicative ability but also in achieving linguistic accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThese misconceptions partly result from the kind of research on tasks, which is often laboratory-based and often focuses on single task performance.
“In part these are the product of the kind of research that has investigated tasksoften laboratory-based and often focusing on the performance of single tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThese misconceptions are likely to persist until there are more accounts of full task-based courses.
“These misconceptions are likely to prevail until there are more accounts of full task-based courses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationTask-based and task-supported teaching rest on different psycholinguistic rationales, but this does not mean only one should be chosen.
“Task-based and task-supported teaching draw on different psycholinguistic rationalesas Long (2015) pointed outbut it does not follow that we should opt for just one of these.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Long (2015)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
Learners have wants as well as needs.
“One problem is that learners have wants as well as needs and that good language teaching should go beyond addressing purely functional needs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Certain linguistic features constitute learning problems that persist even at advanced stages of proficiency.
“It is well-known that certain linguistic features (e.g.subject-verb agreement and complex structures such as hypothetical conditionals), constitute learning problems that continue even at advanced stages.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Students, at least adult ones, tend to naturally topicalize problematic linguistic points during the performance of a task.
“Given that students (adult ones at least) tend to naturally topicalize problematic linguistic points during the performance of a task it would seem unwise to dismiss preemptive focus on form.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A task-based syllabus should progress from simple to complex.
“The issue of task complexity is important for syllabus design if one accepts the basic premise that there should be a progression from 'simple' to 'complex'.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Manipulating task design features and implementation options can prioritize learners' attention to complexity, accuracy and fluency and over time help them achieve balanced proficiency.
“Much of the TBLT research has been premised on the assumption that by manipulating task design features and implementation options (such as pre-task planning) it is possible to prioritize the”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Seedhouse citation year differs from the reference
MinorThe discussion cites Seedhouse with a 1999 date, but the listed Seedhouse reference is dated 1997.
“the kind of restricted, pidgin-like output that Seedhouse (1999) was critical of.”
“64. Seedhouse, P. (1997). The case of the missing "no"; the relationship between pedagogy and interaction'.”
Lyster, Saito and Sato citation year differs from the reference
MinorThe text cites this author group with a 2012 date, but its reference-list entry is dated 2013.
“such feedback is effective (Lyster, Saito and Sato, 2012).”
“48. Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms.”
Form-focused episode counts fall short of the stated total
MinorThe three reported categories sum to 429 episodes, not 448. The text does not account for the remaining 19.
Reported 448 · recomputed 429
“In the 448 FFEs Ellis et al identified in 12 hours of teaching, 165 were student-initiated pre-emptive FFEs, 41 pre-emptive teacher-initiated FFEs and 223 reactive FFEs.”
Jobard citation year differs from the reference
MinorThe in-text citation gives 2006, whereas the listed Jobard et al. reference gives 2007.
“draw on unimodal cortical regions of the brain (Jobard et al, 2006).”
“30. Jobard,G., Vigneau,M., Mazoyer, B. & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2007) Impact of modality and linguistic complexity during reading and listening tasks.”
Day and Shapson citation year differs from the reference
MinorThe text cites Day and Shapson as a 1994 study, but the reference list gives 1991 for these authors.
“such as that found in Day and Shapson (1994) and Harley (1989)”
“13. Day, E. & Shapson, S. (1991). Integrating formal and functional approaches to language teaching in French immersion: an experimental study.”
Basturkmen, Loewen and Ellis citation year differs from the reference
MinorThe in-text citation says 2006, while the reference-list entry for these authors says 2004.
“teachers do focus on form during communicative tasks even when they believe they should not be doing so (Basturkmen, Loewen and Ellis (2006).”
“7. Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S. & Ellis, R, (2004). Teachers' stated beliefs about incidental focus on form and their classroom practices.”
Cites
Speaking: from intention to articulation
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-1947 · Cited by 5,016 · see citing works
Speaking: From Intention to Articulation
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001 · Cited by 4,804 · see citing works
Speaking. From Intention to Articulation
Caplan, D. N. (1990) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90151-y · Cited by 4,036 · see citing works
The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition
Long, M. H. (1996) · Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1016/b978-012589042-7/50015-3 · Cited by 3,927 · see citing works
Task-based Language Learning and Teaching
Ellis, R. (2003) · Asian Journal of English Language Teaching · doi:10.65961/ajelt-2003-1-009 · Cited by 3,601 · see citing works
Self-citationA Cognitive Approach to Language Learning
Garcia, P., & Skehan, P. (1999) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587891 · Cited by 3,489 · see citing works
(1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,037 · see citing works
TASK-BASED LANGUAGE LEARNING AND TEACHING
Mackey, A. (2004) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263104293056 · Cited by 2,838 · see citing works
(1998) · Cited by 2,572 · see citing works
Input in Second Language Acquisition
Bottigheimer, R. B., Gass, S. M., & Madden, C. G. (1986) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/327330 · Cited by 2,336 · see citing works
KENYON, D. M., Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1998) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328718 · Cited by 2,323 · see citing works
Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom
Siskin, H. J., & Nunan, D. (1990) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/327949 · Cited by 2,297 · see citing works
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNER UPTAKE: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263197001034 · Cited by 2,259 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The six types of corrective feedback that Lyster & Ranta (1997) identified in their study of immersion classrooms has informed the considerable body of experimental research that followed.”
BackgroundA Framework for Task-Based Learning
Yuan, F., & Willis, J. R. (1999) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588204 · Cited by 1,966 · see citing works
(2000) · Cited by 1,841 · see citing works
Teaching languages to young learners
Cameron, L. (2001) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511733109 · Cited by 1,807 · see citing works
Cognition and Second Language Instruction
Robinson, P. J. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524780 · Cited by 1,753 · see citing works
Allen, J. P., & Prabhu, N. S. (1988) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587293 · Cited by 1,626 · see citing works
A Framework for the Implementation of Task-based Instruction
SKEHAN, P. (1996) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/17.1.38 · Cited by 1,547 · see citing works
(2001) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,333 · see citing works
Schmidt, R. (2001) · Cognition and Second Language Instruction · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524780.003 · Cited by 1,322 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Theoretical arguments can also be made for implicit and explicit feedback; implicit feedback caters to implicit learning whereas explicit feedback is more likely to result in the conscious attention to form that Schmidt (2001) saw as important for acquisition and explicit learning.”
Background(2014) · Cited by 1,210 · see citing works
The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100015047 · Cited by 1,147 · see citing works
IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND THE ACQUISITION OF L2 GRAMMAR
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263106060141 · Cited by 1,076 · see citing works
Self-citationWillis, D., & Willis, J. R. (2007) · Cited by 1,068 · see citing works
MEASURING IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE OF A SECOND LANGUAGE: A Psychometric Study
Ellis, R. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263105050096 · Cited by 1,032 · see citing works
Self-citationTask‐based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings
Ellis, R. (2009) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x · Cited by 1,031 · cited 4× · see citing works
“In other words, he advocates a variety of feedback strategies – a view echoed by Ellis (2009) and Lyster & Ranta (2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation(1997) · Cited by 863 · see citing works
Self-citationDIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF PROMPTS AND RECASTS IN FORM-FOCUSED INSTRUCTION
Lyster, R. (2004) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263104263021 · Cited by 826 · see citing works
Yuan, F. (2003) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/24.1.1 · Cited by 774 · see citing works
INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT: An Empirical Study of Question Formation in ESL
Mackey, A. (1999) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263199004027 · Cited by 772 · see citing works
Thomas, M. (1999) · Language · doi:10.2307/417479 · Cited by 757 · see citing works
Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444812000365 · Cited by 741 · see citing works
Lyster, R. (1998) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00039 · Cited by 681 · see citing works
Second Language Needs Analysis
Long, M. H. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511667299 · Cited by 646 · see citing works
Robinson, P. J. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524780.012 · Cited by 615 · see citing works
Learner Uptake in Communicative ESL Lessons
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00156 · Cited by 595 · see citing works
Self-citationONE SIZE FITS ALL?: Recasts, Prompts, and L2 Learning
Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263106060268 · Cited by 541 · see citing works
Legislation by Hypothesis: The Case of Task-Based Instruction
Swan, M. (2005) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/ami013 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Issues in Teachers' Reinterpretation of a Task-Based Innovation in Primary Schools
Carless, D. (2004) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588283 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition
(2005) · Blackwell Publishing Ltd eBooks · doi:10.1111/b.9781405132817.2005.00002.x · Cited by 462 · see citing works
The Implementation of Communicative and Task-Based Language Teaching in the Asia-Pacific Region
Butler, Y. G. (2011) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190511000122 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Teachers' Stated Beliefs about Incidental Focus on Form and their Classroom Practices
Baştürkmen, H. (2004) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/25.2.243 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
(2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511667282 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition
Finnemann, M. D., Hyltenstam, K., & Peinemann, M. (1986) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/327333 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
(2007) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · Cited by 390 · see citing works
(2006) · Cited by 383 · see citing works
INCIDENTAL FOCUS ON FORM AND SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING
Loewen, S. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263105050163 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Revisiting readability: a unified framework for predicting text quality
Pitler, E., & Nenkova, A. (2008) · Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - EMNLP '08 · doi:10.3115/1613715.1613742 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues
Long, M. H. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000057 · Cited by 359 · cited 9× · see citing works
“The critiques levelled at TBLT are based on ‘misunderstandings’ about TBLT and concern ‘non-issues’ and have already been adequately addressed (see Ellis 2009; Long 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialMethodological issues in learner needs analysis
Long, M. H. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511667299.002 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Problems in Second Language Acquisition
Long, M. H. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315089447 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Second Language Task Complexity
(2011) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.2 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Some reflections on task-based language performance assessment
Bachman, L. F. (2002) · Language Testing · doi:10.1191/0265532202lt240oa · Cited by 318 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Bachman (2002), in a discussion of task-based assessment, also questioned whether tasks should be defined as target tasks for all second language (L2) learners and argued that a needs-based approach is not always appropriate.”
BackgroundLearning Teaching. A Guidebook for English Language Teachers.
Scrivener, J. (2001) · Cited by 291 · see citing works
THE CASE AGAINST THE CASE AGAINST RECASTS
Goo, J., & Mackey, A. (2013) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263112000708 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Functional Grammar in French Immersion: A Classroom Experiment1
HARLEY, B. (1989) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/10.3.331 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Responses to Recasts: Repetitions, Primed Production, and Linguistic Development
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2006) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00393.x · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Robinson, P. (2011) · Task-Based Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.2.05ch1 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Input, interaction, and corrective feedback in L2 learning
Sáez, N. (2013) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.7916/d8rf66nm · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Current Uses for Task-Based Language Assessment
Norris, J. M. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190516000027 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
de la Fuente, M. J. (2006) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/1362168806lr196oa · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Input-based Tasks in Foreign Language Instruction for Young Learners
Shintani, N. (2016) · Task-Based Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.9 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
PEER INTERACTION AND CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FOR ACCURACY AND FLUENCY DEVELOPMENT
Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2012) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263112000356 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Mochizuki, N., & Ortega, L. (2008) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168807084492 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Day, E. M., & Shapson, S. M. (1991) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00675.x · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Comparing Focus on Form and Focus on FormS in Second-Language Vocabulary Learning
Laufer, B. (2006) · The Canadian Modern Language Review · doi:10.3138/cmlr.63.1.149 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Is a ‘Complex’ Task Really Complex? Validating the Assumption of Cognitive Task Complexity
SASAYAMA, S. (2016) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12313 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
‘I’m still not sure what a task is’: Teachers designing language tasks
Erlam, R. (2016) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168814566087 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Grammar Teaching – Practice or Consciousness-Raising?
Ellis, R. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511667190.023 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Self-citationRévész, A., Michel, M., & Gilabert, R. (2016) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263115000339 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Lyster, R. (2001) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00019.x · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Tasks Versus Conditions: Two Perspectives on Task Research and Their Implications for Pedagogy
Skehan, P. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000100 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Task-Based Versus Task-Supported Language Instruction: An Experimental Study
Li, S., Ellis, R., & Zhu, Y. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000069 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Self-citationUsing task repetition to direct learner attention and focus on form
Hawkes, M. L. (2012) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/ccr059 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Investigations in Instructed Second Language Acquisition
Housen, A., & Pierrard, M. (2005) · doi:10.1515/9783110197372 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Comparing Elicited Imitation and Word Monitoring as Measures of Implicit Knowledge
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2015) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12138 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
The Case of the Missing “No”: The Relationship Between Pedagogy and Interaction
Seedhouse, P. (2001) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00021.x · Cited by 138 · see citing works
(2012) · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Impact of modality and linguistic complexity during reading and listening tasks
Jobard, G., Vigneau, M., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.067 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
A Critical Analysis of the Advocacy of the Task-Based Syllabus
Sheen, R. (1994) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587202 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Trouble-shooting in Interaction with Learners: the more the merrier?
Aston, G. (1986) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/7.2.128 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
The Case of the Missing “No”: The Relationship between Pedagogy and Interaction
Seedhouse, P. (1997) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00019 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Simplification : theory and application
Tickoo, M. L. (1993) · SEAMEO Regional Language Centre eBooks · Cited by 120 · see citing works
From tasking purposes to purposing tasks
Bruton, A. (2002) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/56.3.280 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
The use of test method characteristics in the content analysis and design of EFL proficiency tests
Bachman, L. F., Davidson, F., & Milanović, M. (1996) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/026553229601300201 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
INVESTIGATIONS IN INSTRUCTED SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION
Sauro, S. J. (2006) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263106360299 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Modifications That Preserve Language and Content.
(1993) · Cited by 53 · see citing works
(2014) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Focus on formS as a means of improving accurate oral production
Sheen, R. (2005) · Investigations in Instructed Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1515/9783110197372.2.271 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2014) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168813519885 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationSecond Language Acquisition and Second Language Pedagogy
Murray, D. E., & Christison, M. (2019) · doi:10.4324/9781351139847-15 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
(2011) · DergiPark (Istanbul University) · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Adams, 2007, Conversational interaction in second language learning, 29
- Dale, 1948, A formula for predicting readability: Instructions, Educational Research Bulletin, 27, 37
- Long, 2006, Problems in SLA
- Swain, 1998, Focus-on-form in classroom second language acquisition, 64
- Doughty, 1998, Focus on form in classroom second language, 114
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Task-Based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108643689 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Self-citationTask-based language teaching theory and practice
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020) · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching
Nuzzo, E., & Velásquez, D. C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Foundational Principles ofTask-Based Language Teaching
East, M. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003039709 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Task-Based Learning in Task-Based Teaching: Training Teachers of Chinese as a Foreign Language
Han, Z. (2018) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s026719051800003x · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Bryfonski, L. (2021) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688211026570 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
“However, the ability of teacher education programs to train teachers to implement these key principles has been called one of the remaining ‘real issues’ for TBLT (Ellis, 2017; Long, 2016).”
BackgroundLiu, Y., & Ren, W. (2021) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688211044247 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
“Various criteria for defining tasks have been proposed (e.g. Ellis, 2003, 2017; Willis & Willis, 2007), including task authenticity, primarily focusing on meaning and student-centredness.”
InfluentialZhu, Y. (2020) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168819894706 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
“…educator provided practice-oriented, ongoing support (van den Branden, 2006) to help a novice primary teacher identify ‘real problems’ (Ellis, 2017, p. 521) in everyday classroom practices and overcome obstacles to implement tasks, through cyclical task evaluations of and critical…”
BackgroundOptions in a task-based language-teaching curriculum
Ellis, R. (2021) · TASK Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1075/task.00002.ell · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationTask closure and task complexity effects on L2 written performance
Lee, J. (2020) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100777 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Qiang, S., & Zhang, L. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.593172 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“Ellis extends Long’s definition of focus-on-form, defining it as either drawing students’ attention to linguistic elements as they arise incidentally or to preselected language items in communicative activities (Ellis, 2001, 2017).”
BackgroundDifferential Effects of Strategic Planning and Task Structure on L2 Writing Outcomes
Tabari, M. A. (2019) · Reading & Writing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10573569.2019.1637310 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“…identifiable timeline) and planning time (i.e., the provision of an opportunity to do mental work before and/or during task performance) that are fully integrated in real-world communicative contexts (Ellis, 2017) influence L2 written production as examined by general and specific CAFL measures.”
BackgroundKayır, G. (2020) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-3146-4.ch006 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Interaction, Language Use, and Second Language Teaching
Huth, T. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003017356 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Task-Based Teacher Training: Implementation and Evaluation in Central American Bilingual Schools
Bryfonski, L. (2019) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 40 · see citing works
The influence of pre-task grammar instruction on L2 learning: An experimental study
Li, S., Ellis, R., & Kim, J. (2018) · Studies in English Education · doi:10.22275/see.23.4.03 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationChan, J. Y. H. (2019) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168819865563 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“Thus the aforementioned constraints may mean that in practice CLT or TBLT are often adapted in various ways (Carless, 2007, 2015), with learning and teaching activities somewhere between what Ellis called an ‘exercise’ and a ‘task’ (Ellis, 2003, 2017).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAgency and technology-mediated task repetition with young learners
Pinter, A. (2019) · Language Teaching for Young Learners · doi:10.1075/ltyl.00010.pin · Cited by 42 · see citing works
“Ellis (2017) argued that designers of task-based courses will need to draw on both what research has shown about task complexity and on their own experience and intuitions of what constitutes the right type of task for a particular group of learners (p. 514), and, it would be only one further step…”
BackgroundCrookes, G. V., & Ziegler, N. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11060254 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Defining tasks remains a somewhat debated topic within the field of TBLT, as tasks and task-based language teaching are interpreted differently by different scholars [43], with Ellis [44] recently highlighting that the operationalization of “task” remains a “real issue” (p. 2).”
BackgroundInfluentialQiang, S., & Zhang, L. J. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14084711 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“Based on Long’s theory, Ellis puts forward two types of focus on form instruction, “incidental focus on form” and “planned focus on form” [58,59].”
BackgroundHa, X. V., Tran, N. G., & Trần, N. H. (2021) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5063 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“Due to the growing popularity of TBLT, an extensive body of research has investigated the effectiveness of tasks and the effects of TBLT on learner second/foreign language (L2) development (Ellis, 2017).”
BackgroundHow can register analysis inform task-based language teaching?
Crawford, W., & Zhang, M. (2021) · Register Studies · doi:10.1075/rs.20021.cra · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The Cognition Hypothesis, the Triadic Componential Framework and the SSARC Model
Robinson, P. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.013 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
From Needs Analysis to Task Selection, Design, and Sequencing
Gilabert, R., & Malicka, A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.014 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
The effects of hybrid online planning and L2 proficiency on video-based speaking task performance
Wang, Z., Skehan, P., & Chen, G. (2019) · Instructed Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1558/isla.37398 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Task-Based Language Teaching as an Innovation
den Branden, K. V. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.035 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Kessler, M., & Casal, J. E. (2024) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101384 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Kim, Y., & Namkung, Y. (2024) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190524000096 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“Despite critiques of TBLT, several review papers (Ellis, 2017; Long, 2016) and meta-analyses (Bryfonski & McKay, 2019) have emphasized the abundant empirical support for the benefits of using tasks for L2 instruction.”
Why Task? Task as a Unit of Analysis for Language Education
Sasayama, S. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.004 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Jia, S., & Harji, M. B. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11586-y · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“…(2023) 28:9783–9802 1 3 • Language-teaching approaches and methods: (Ellis & Shintani, 2013; Richards & Rodgers 2014) • Advancement and evaluation of TBLT: (Ellis, 2016, 2017; González-Lloret & Nielson, 2015) • Influencing factors (engagement, task preference, task repetition, content…”
Bygate, M., Samuda, V., & den Branden, K. V. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.003 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Tabari, M. A., Johnson, M. D., & Farahanynia, M. (2023) · Assessing Writing: An International Journal · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100783 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Responding to the critics: Implementation of TBLT in Japan
Harris, J. (2018) · Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.17509/ijal.v8i1.11473 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Research trends in task-based language teaching: A bibliometric analysis from 1985 to 2020
Qin, J., & Lei, L. (2022) · Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.3.3 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“…have been published, such as monographs (e.g., Ellis et al., 2020; Long, 2015), edited volumes (e.g., Ahmadian & Long, 2021; Samuda et al., 2018), state-of-the-art articles (e.g., Ellis, 2017; Long, 2016; Van den Branden, 2016), and empirical studies (e.g., Michel et al., 2020; Qin & Zhang, 2022).”
Tabari, M. A., & Goetze, J. (2024) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12582 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Khezrlou, S. (2023) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2023.2177659 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“…uncertainties concern whether TSLT can help learners gain both explicit and automatized explicit knowledge of ‘those linguistic features that are not learned “naturally”’ (Ellis, 2017, p. 515), and how the incorporation of instruction into task performance could maximize learners’ task engagement.”
BackgroundIsmail, S. M., Wang, C., & Jamalyar, R. (2023) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-023-00216-2 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“In order to enhance participants’ reading comprehension skills, the blended learning paradigm proposed by Staker and Horn (2012) was incorporated into Ellis’ (2017) task-based model.”
BackgroundMethodTask-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics
Taguchi, N., & Kim, Y. (2018) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.10.01tag · Cited by 16 · see citing works
The development and validation of the scale of design thinking for teaching (SDTT)
Cai, Y., & Yang, Y. (2023) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101255 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Tabari, M. A., Farahanynia, M., & Botes, E. (2024) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100912 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Chan, J. Y. H., & Walsh, S. (2023) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12486 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Noroozi, M., & Taheri, S. (2022) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2022.2105775 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“TaskBased Language Teaching takes language learners’ needs analysis as its starting point to determine the target tasks that language learners ultimately need to perform using the target language (Ellis, 2017).”
BackgroundMethodA review of learner motivation and engagement research in task-based language teaching
Namkung, Y., & Kim, Y. (2024) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.16.07nam · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Foundational principles of task-based language teaching
Wang, Q. (2023) · Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.14746/ssllt.38285 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Task-Based Language Assessment
Norris, J. M., & East, M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.029 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
The contributions of working memory and pre-task explicit instruction to L2 oral performance
Sadeghi, M., & Pourhaji, M. (2020) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102409 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Taking communication to task once more – a further decade on
East, M. (2024) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2024.2305424 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“As Ellis (2017: 521) noted, in a context where TBLT continues to represent ‘a major innovation for many teachers’, the persistent challenges with TBLT ‘can only be addressed through carefully designed initial and in-service teacher training/education programmes that take account of the…”
Mulyadi, D., Singh, C. K. S., Setiawan, A., et al. (2023) · Studies in English Language and Education · doi:10.24815/siele.v10i3.27910 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Numerous scholars have asserted that TBLT is the ideal pedagogical technique for language teaching and learning because it enables students to effectively learn language through authentic communicative tasks (Chen, 2021; Ellis, 2017; Li et al., 2016).”
BackgroundHasnain, S., & Halder, S. (2021) · World Futures · doi:10.1080/02604027.2021.1996189 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“The psychological perspectives such as input ( “ Input Hypothesis ” Krashen, 1985), output (Swain ’ s Output Hypothesis ’ , 1985, 1995, 2005), feedback (Ellis, 2017; Lyster & Ranta, 2013) interaction (Long, 1983, 1996) play an important role in task-based approach which indicates that this approach…”
BackgroundDoing Critical Language Teaching through Tasks: Insights from the Brazilian Context
Farias, P. F., & da Silva, L. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11050223 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“First of all, we highlight that they both draw on Ellis’ [8,9] definition for a task, which corresponds to a language activity that directs learners’ attention to meaning-making by giving them a communicative outcome to be achieved, and which resembles activities from the real-world.”
BackgroundInfluentialEllis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · Task-Based Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/9781108643689.010 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationL2 task engagement: A research agenda
Hiver, P. V., Dao, P., & Yamazaki, J. S. (2025) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444825101043 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Scholars must remain mindful of the somewhat varying definitions of tasks that can create confusion in synthetic work on the topic (Ellis, 2017; Long, 2016).”
Teachers’ and learners’ beliefs about task-based language teaching
Dao, P., Iwashita, N., Nguyen, M. X. N. C., & Arias-Contreras, C. (2024) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.16.08dao · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Yang, H., Tsung, L., & Cao, L. (2022) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440221141877 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Debates have centered on whether explicit instruction should be provided before the task or re-actively after task, as well as whether the timing of corrective feedback should be during the task or after the task (Ellis, 2017; Long, 2015).”
BackgroundTian, L.-L., & Jiang, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.699774 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“With the prevalence of communicative language teaching (Nunan, 2003) and task-based language teaching (Ellis, 2017) since the 1990s, task-based peer interaction has been widely practiced in large classes in East Asian English as a foreign language (EFL) contexts (Littlewood, 2007; Li, 2014) in…”
BackgroundSamuda, V., Bygate, M., & den Branden, K. V. (2018) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.12.01sam · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Esteban, C. L. (2023) · Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca eBooks · doi:10.14201/0aq0347 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Rod Ellis's essential bookshelf: Focus on form
Ellis, R. (2022) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s026144482200012x · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“…provides a broad and general account of current issues but could not find one so I have opted to focus on one issue that both Long (2016) and I (Ellis, 2017) see as crucial for the successful implementation of TBLT and focus on form in particular – the professional development of TBLT teachers.”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Adoption of Task-Based Language Teaching in Diverse Contexts
Newton, J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.036 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Technology-Mediated Task-Based Language Teaching
González‐Lloret, M., & Ziegler, N. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.019 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Revisiting the notion of ESL: A corpus-based analysis of English textbook instructional language
Chan, H., & Cheuk, H. N. J. (2020) · Ampersand · doi:10.1016/j.amper.2020.100066 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“…pages, we sometimes queried the practicality and genuineness of such invites in regard to whether or not they promote real interactional authenticity and social engagement (Ellis, 2017; Philp and Duchesne, 2016) (i.e., positive encouragement among learners and active listening from others).”
BackgroundBear, E., Chen, X., Souto, D. V., Ribeiro-Flucht, L., Rudzewitz, B., & Meurers, D. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103460 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Payant, C., & Michaud, G. (2021) · La Revue de l'AQEFLS/Revue de l'AQEFLS · doi:10.7202/1081264ar · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“…être principalement axée sur le sens, doit comporter un but communicatif identifiable et mesurable, doit tenir compte des besoins des apprenants, doit refléter un langage réel et authentique et doit s’inscrire dans un contexte propice à la réflexion sur l’expérience d’apprentissage (Ellis, 2017).”
BackgroundExamining the Task Complexity in ELT Coursebooks
Barrot, J. S. (2019) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-019-00448-2 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“In fact, many scholars (e.g., Bao and Du 2015; Ellis 2017; Robinson 2005; Skehan 1996) argued that tasks could be a viable alternative unit of syllabus design.”
BackgroundReflections on Task-Based Language Teaching
Baralt, M. (2019) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/ccz005 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Rahimi, A. R. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100420 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Piccardo, E., & Payre-Ficout, C. (2022) · Educational linguistics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87124-6_2 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Preface The Origins and Growth of Task-Based Language Teaching
Long, M. H., & Ahmadian, M. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.001 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Use of Project-based Training in Teaching Business Translation
Al-Sowaidi, B. (2021) · European Journal of Education and Pedagogy · doi:10.24018/ejedu.2021.2.4.114 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“In this paper, the term 'project-based training' is used in its broadest sense to refer to a work plan or a thoroughgoing approach that targets the act of translation, links it to realworld endeavours, prioritizes project completion, and evaluates outcomes [1].”
BackgroundYang, M., Meng, X., & Deris, F. D. (2024) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102086 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Social justice in the language classroom: a roadmap for lower-division Spanish curricula
Rutté, A. M. M. D., & Morgan, W. J. (2023) · Journal of Spanish Language Teaching · doi:10.1080/23247797.2023.2201992 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Fasih, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.950203 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“In other words, the authentic tasks are utilized to assess what a learner can do with language in a real or semi-real world, and these tasks are designed to assess the behavior of learners in a natural world (Ellis, 2017).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialConnecting Teacher Training to Task-Based Language Teaching Implementation
Bryfonski, L. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.027 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Child Interaction in Task-Supported EFL/CLIL Contexts
Mayo, M. D. P. G. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.023 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
The Psycholinguistics of Task-Based Performance
Skehan, P. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.002 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Moyo, J. F. J. (2020) · South African Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.20853/34-6-4236 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“The FonF or FFI approach, which is preferred in task-based language teaching, championed by both Long (1997) and Ellis (2017), now employs pedagogic tasks and form-focused materials, which Basturkmen (2017, 10) describes in ESP as “materials to help learners notice discourse or grammar features in specialist language…”
Kim, Y., Kang, S., & D’Arienzo, M. (2021) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12742 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Methodological Approaches to Investigating Task-Based Language Teaching
Révész, A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.034 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
One game, many approaches: How teachers can use a single game with any teaching methodology
Spano, F., York, J., deHaan, J. W., & Bard, R. (2021) · Ludic Language Pedagogy · doi:10.55853/llp_v3pg8 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“However, literature that validates TBLT from a cognitive or psycholinguistic perspective continues to be written (Long, 2016; Ellis, 2017; Loewen & Sato, 2018).”
BackgroundMethodology of Task-Based Language Teaching
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · Task-Based Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/9781108643689.013 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationEllis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · Task-Based Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/9781108643689.009 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationPayant, C. (2019) · Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.7202/1060904ar · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Pour cette raison, un nombre important de chercheurs se sont intéressés aux caractéristiques des tâches qui favorisent l’interaction, ainsi qu’à la façon optimale d’exécuter ces dernières et aux perceptions des enseignants concernant cette approche basée sur les tâches (East, 2012 ; Hu, 2013 ;…”
BackgroundInfluentialAlahmed, K. I. (2017) · White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 5 · see citing works
A journey of sustainable TBLT curricular development
Kim, Y. (2024) · TASK Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1075/task.00035.kim · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Villalba, K., Jimeno, M., Robles, H., et al. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3444741 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Real-world scenarios attempt to cover any linguistic skills and psychological process involved, such as reasoning, deducing, selecting and sequencing [13], [14].”
BackgroundIdeating task‐based designs for special education learners
Chan, H. (2023) · TESOL Journal · doi:10.1002/tesj.711 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The interface between instructed L2 pragmatics and TBLT research
Kim, Y. (2022) · Applied Pragmatics · doi:10.1075/ap.00007.kim · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Evaluating Task-Based Language Programs
Norris, J. M., & Davis, J. M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.030 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Digital Games in the Elementary Classroom: Using Club Penguin Island with Grade 6 ESL students
Couture-Matte, R. (2021) · Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes · doi:10.3138/cmlr-2020-0050 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Universitas Negeri Semarang, I., Tusino, O., Faridi, A., et al. (2021) · The Journal of AsiaTEFL · doi:10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.1.17.262 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Task-based language teaching (TBLT) considers a task as the central component in language learning (Ellis, 2017).”
Developing conceptual metaphor–based tasks in the teaching and learning of idiomatic expressions
Upadhaya, B., & Sudharshana, N. P. (2020) · TESOL Journal · doi:10.1002/tesj.560 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Implementing Task-Based Language Teaching in Saudi EFL Classrooms
Aljasir, N. (2024) · International Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development · doi:10.4018/ijtepd.354736 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Investigating collaborative oral task repetition as a language anxiety reduction strategy
Aramaki, T. (2024) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2024.2367306 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“:3) ı a Mayo, 2017).”
InfluentialAzmy, K., & Nanda, D. W. (2024) · JURNAL ILMIAH DIDAKTIKA Media Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pengajaran · doi:10.22373/jid.v24i2.22730 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
O papel docente crítico na sala de aula de língua adicional
Farias, P. F. (2023) · Infosur · doi:10.35305/rev.infosur.vi2.82 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Oliver, R., & Sato, M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.024 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Exploring the Nuts and Bolts of Task Design
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.016 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Task-Based Telecollaborative Exchanges between US and Italian Students
Nuzzo, E., & Velásquez, D. C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.015 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Designing Pedagogic Tasks for Refugees Learning English to Enter Universities in the Netherlands
Gök, S. Ö., & Michel, M. C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.017 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
A Psycholinguistically Motivated Methodology for Task-Based Language Teaching
Grañena, G., & Yılmaz, Y. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.018 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ellis, R.
- Affiliations
- Curtin University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Ellis, Rod
- ORCID
- Ellis, Rod
- Venue
- Language Teaching
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2017-09-14
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 507-526
- ISSN
- 0261-4448 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-3049
- OpenAlex
- W2754116647
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 92
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 98.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Language Teaching (publishedVersion)
- eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- task-based language teaching, task definition, form-focused instruction, task complexity, task sequencing, explicit instruction, teacher professional development, language syllabus design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-01.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-01.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review