Cited by 267EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Learning and TeachingSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward

Open access
Ellis, Rod·2017·Language Teaching

Abstract

The advocacy of task-based language teaching (TBLT) has met with resistance. The critiques of TBLT and the misconceptions that underlie them have already been addressed in Ellis (2009) and Long (2016). The purpose of this article is to move forward by examining a number of real problems that TBLT faces – such as how a ‘task’ should be defined, the nature and timing of the ‘focus-on-form’ required, how to determine task complexity and sequence tasks, the role of explicit instruction, the timing of focus on form and the teacher training needed to ensure effective uptake of TBLT – and to also consider what solutions are possible. Disagreements exist regarding the relative merits of task-based and task-supported language teaching. I will propose that a hybrid/modular syllabus that allows for a balance between an object-oriented and a tool-oriented view of language teaching offers the most promising way forward.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0261444817000179

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

11 of 104 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationcitation

    Transferability might appear in the use of specific linguistic features even if it is not visible in global measures.

    “It is possible, however, that while transferability is not evident in these global measures it may become evident in the use of specific linguistic features (see, for example, Shintani & Ellis, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shintani & Ellis, 2014 source
  • Study design and conductnone given

    Quinn (2014) was laboratory-based.

    “This study was also laboratory-based.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Quinn (2014)
  • Findingcitation

    There is little discussion in TBLT about whether reactive focus on form must happen during a task or can be delayed until after it.

    “There is little discussion of this in TBLT circles -but see Samuda (2001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Samuda (2001)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingnone given

    Research has usually examined intensive feedback aimed at one linguistic feature and elicited through focused tasks.

    “Fourth, and perhaps most important, the research has typically investigated the effects of intensive feedback directed at a single linguistic feature (e.g.regular past tense) elicited by means of focused tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    There is very little experimental research on extensive feedback that addresses many linguistic problems as they arise during unfocused tasks.

    “For obvious reasons, there has been very little experimental research that has investigated extensive feedback directed at a whole range of linguistic problems as these arise during the performance of unfocused tasks”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 97
  • May combine two claims. 48
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Long questioned whether metalinguistic knowledge gained at one time can be used by the learner at another time, as Swan claimed.

    “but he also questioned whether metalinguistic knowledge acquired at one time can be used by the learner at another timeas Swan claimed can happen.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Long (2016) source

      In §2.3, Long says it would be “patently absurd” to suppose that metalinguistic knowledge provided at Time 1 could never be used at Time 2. He questions the long-term benefit in Swan’s example and says such knowledge is usually of limited value, but does not question whether later use is possible. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Swan

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The critiques directed at TBLT rest on misunderstandings, concern non-issues, and have already been adequately answered in prior work.

    “The critiques levelled at TBLT are based on “misunderstandings” about TBLT and concern “non-issues” and have already been adequately addressed (see Ellis, 2009;Long, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ellis, 2009 source
    • cites Long, 2016 source

      The Abstract says most of the 14 criticisms are nonissues, and section 3.1 calls one criticism a misunderstanding. But the Abstract and Conclusion also acknowledge that some criticisms raise important matters, and the passages do not establish that the critiques had already been adequately answered in prior work. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    More recent readability measures also take account of discourse factors such as cohesion and coherence.

    “However, in more recent work (e.g.Pitler and Nenkova, 2008) measures that also take account of discourse factors such as cohesion and coherence have been developed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pitler and Nenkova, 2008 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Long (2016) produced his own list of real issues, covering only items 3, 9 and 10 of the author's Table 1, based on his particular conception of TBLT.

    “Long (2016), in an issue of the Annual Review of Applied Linguistics devoted to TBLT, produced his own list of 'real issues' (only #3, 9 and 10 in Table 1) based on his particular view of what constitutes TBLT .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Long (2016) source

      Section 5, “Tasks and TBLT: Some Real Issues,” says Long will mention three real issues, and the paper defines the conception of TBLT he uses. Our copy cannot establish whether those issues correspond only to items 3, 9 and 10 of the citing author's Table 1. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Researchers have investigated the relative effects of input-providing versus output-prompting feedback, and of implicit versus explicit feedback.

    “Some researchers (e.g.Lyster, 2004;Ammar and Spada, 2006) investigated the relative effects of input-providing feedback (e.g.recasts) versus output-prompting feedback (e.g.clarification requests, metalinguistic feedback and elicitation).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lyster, 2004 source
    • cites Ammar and Spada, 2006 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Long (2016) stated that acquisition does not occur only online during communication.

    “Long (2016) pointed out that that this is not the case”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Long (2016) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Goo and Mackey (2013) argue for carefully designed studies investigating the effects of narrowly prescribed types of corrective feedback.

    “Goo and Mackey (2013), for example, argue for carefully designed studies that investigate the effects of narrowly prescribed types of corrective feedback.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Goo and Mackey (2013) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Long stressed that focus on form must be reactive.

    “What Long emphasized is that focus on form must be reactive.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Long (2016) source

      Section 2.1 describes focus on form in TBLT as reactive and often triggered by task work. But it does not say it must always be reactive; section 2.5 also allows teachers or task designers to deliberately direct attention to language during meaning-focused use. The claim turns a description into an absolute requirement. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Some progress has been made in measuring explicit and implicit knowledge separately, although problems remain.

    “Some progress has been made (see, for example, Ellis, 2005) although problems still remain (see Suzuki and DeKeyser, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ellis, 2005 source
    • cites Suzuki and DeKeyser, 2015 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Complexity, accuracy and fluency improve when a task is repeated, but this improvement does not appear to transfer to a new task.

    “Complexity, accuracy and fluency improve when the task is repeated but this improvement does not seem to transfer to the performance of a new task.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Erlam (2016) found that tasks teachers designed in an in-service programme did not fully match a definition of a task.

    “Erlam (2016) found that the tasks she asked teachers to design in an in-service programme did not fully match up to a definition of a 'task' [5].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Erlam (2016) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Carless (2004) noted that teachers do not always have a clear idea of what a task is.

    “A particular problem noted by Carless (2004) is that teachers do not always have a clear idea of what a 'task' is.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carless (2004) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In Li, Zhu and Ellis (2016), both immediate and delayed feedback groups improved in accuracy, while the no-feedback group did not.

    “Both the immediate and delayed feedback groups showed gains in accuracy whereas the no-feedback group did not.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Li, Zhu and Ellis (2016) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In Quinn (2014), both immediate and delayed feedback groups improved significantly in accurate use of English passive constructions, with no difference between them.

    “There were statistically significant improvements in the accurate use of the target structure (English passive constructions) in both the immediate and delayed feedback groups but no difference between them.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Quinn (2014)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    In Erlam (2016), teachers tended to design tasks with prior presentation of language, reflecting their existing ideas about what a task should do.

    “In particular, the teachers tended to design tasks that involved the prior presentation of language reflecting their pre-existing ideas of what a task should do.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Erlam (2016) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Swain's research provides strong evidence that language-related episodes occur during tasks and that learning results, especially when the problems in those episodes are resolved successfully.

    “Swain's research (e.g. Swain, 1998) also provides convincing evidence that language-related episodes arise as learners perform tasks and that learning results especially if the problems that these episodes address are resolved successfully.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Swain, 1998

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In Quinn (2014), the no-feedback condition also improved similarly, suggesting that gains came from simply doing the task.

    “However, in this study the no feedback condition also resulted in similar levels of improvement suggesting that gains resulted from simply performing the task.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Quinn (2014)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Adams' own study found that learners gave each other feedback during opinion-gap and information-gap tasks and that this led to both grammar and vocabulary learning.

    “Adams' own study found that learners did provide each other with feedback when performing opinion-gap and information-gap tasks and that it resulted in both grammar and vocabulary learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Adams

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    From the author's experience, teachers often ask how to assess students in TBLT when there are no explicit linguistic targets.

    “However, from my own experience teachers often ask how they assess students in TBLT when there are no explicit linguistic targets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    There is a lack of discussion about what participatory structure is appropriate for different groups of students.

    “What is lacking is any discussion about what constitutes an appropriate participatory structure for different groups of students.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In Li, Zhu and Ellis (2016), gains appeared only on a grammaticality judgement test, not on an elicited oral imitation test, suggesting the feedback produced only explicit knowledge.

    “However, the gains were only evident in a grammaticality judgement test, not in an elicited oral imitation test, suggesting that the feedback only resulted in explicit knowledge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Li, Zhu and Ellis (2016) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Findingreasoning

    Misconceptions about TBLT are widespread.

    “Misconceptions about TBLT abound.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    To date, very little research has examined how effective teacher education or training programmes are in helping teachers implement TBLT.

    “However, to date, there has been very little research investigating the how effective teacher education/ training programmes are in enabling teachers to implement TBLT.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    There is plenty of evidence that explicit instruction involving focused tasks is effective.

    “There is plenty of evidence to show that explicit instruction involving focused tasks is effective.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    There is disagreement about the relative merits of task-based and task-supported language teaching.

    “Disagreements exist regarding the relative merits of task-based and task-supported language teaching.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Measuring the learning that results from unfocused tasks is difficult and has rarely been undertaken.

    “Measuring the learning that results from unfocused tasks is difficult and, in fact, has been rarely undertaken.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Real-world tasks aim at situational authenticity because they are based on target tasks performed outside the classroom.

    “Real-world tasks aim at situational authenticity as they are based on the target tasks performed in the outside world.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bachman and Palmer, 1996

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Determining input complexity is relevant for all tasks that incorporate linguistic input in the task materials.

    “Determining input complexity is relevant for all tasks that incorporate linguistic input in the task materials.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Course designers and materials writers need reliable criteria for determining task complexity.

    “Long is right as course designers and materials writers do need reliable criteria for determining task complexity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Reliable criteria for determining task complexity do not currently exist, and what is needed is not just a list of putative design variables but a theory of how the variables interact.

    “However we do not currently have such criteria and we need not just a list of putative design variables but a theory of how the variables interact to determine complexity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Alternative versions of TBLT are possible and are necessary in order to accommodate different instructional contexts.

    “My list is longer, reflecting my view that alternative versions of TBLT are possible and indeed are necessary to accommodate different instructional contexts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Consciousness-raising tasks have no place in Long's version of TBLT, where all tasks must address functional needs.

    “Consciousness-raising tasks, however, clearly do not have a place in Long's version of TBLT where all tasks must address functional needs although an exception might be in a task-based programme for linguists!”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Input-based tasks are easily conducted with the whole class, which makes them well-suited to large classes and to teachers used to lockstep teaching.

    “Input-based tasks are easily conducted with the whole class making them well-suited to large classes and to teachers more used to teaching in lockstep.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Task complexity matters for syllabus design if one accepts that there should be a progression from simple to complex.

    “The issue of task complexity is important for syllabus design if one accepts the basic premise that there should be a progression from 'simple' to 'complex'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: A task-based syllabus should progress from simple to complex.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Language can be made the topic of talk just like any other topic.

    “After all, one can make language the topic of talk just like any other topic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Input-based tasks are useful for introducing task-based teaching to learners accustomed to a more traditional structural approach who may resist treating language as a tool.

    “Input-based tasks are also useful for introducing taskbased teaching to learners who are accustomed to a more traditional, structural approach and who may be resistant to a mode of teaching that requires them to treat language as a tool rather than as an object.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Tasks are holistic and thus involve conglomerates of factors.

    “The secondand to my mind the more serious problem -is that tasks are holistic and thus involve conglomerates of factors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Explicit knowledge of specific features that are problematic for learners might facilitate attention to those features in subsequent input and output.

    “Again, I do not envisage that such tasks should comprise a complete programme but see them as a means for developing explicit knowledge of specific features that are problematic to learners on the grounds that such knowledge might facilitate attention to these features in subsequent input and output.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Certain linguistic features constitute learning problems that persist even at advanced stages of proficiency.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A needs-based approach is not always appropriate, and it is questionable whether tasks should be defined as target tasks for all L2 learners.

    “Bachman (2002), in a discussion of task-based assessment also questioned whether tasks should be defined as target tasks for all L2 learners and argued that a needs-based approach is not always appropriate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bachman (2002) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Situational authenticity is not particularly relevant when the purpose is to assess the communicative abilities of general purpose learners.

    “He saw situational authenticity as not particularly relevant when the purpose is to assess the communicative abilities of general purpose learners.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bachman (2002) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Robinson's Cognition Hypothesis, particularly the Task Complexity factors of his Triadic Componential Framework, is the most developed framework for sequencing tasks from simple to complex and has attracted the most research.

    “The most developed framework for sequencing tasks from simple to complexand the one that has attracted the most research -is Robinson's (2001;2011) Cognition Hypothesis, in particular those factors in his Triadic Componential Framework relating to Task Complexity, which he claims provide “a parsimonious way to sequence L2 tasks in a program of instruction” (2011; 10).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Robinson (2001;2011)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Focused tasks have a place both in a language programme and in research designed to inform pedagogy.

    “In Ellis (2003), however, I argued that focused tasks have a place in both a language programme and in research designed to inform pedagogy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ellis (2003) source
    • Rests on an assumption: Certain linguistic features constitute learning problems that persist even at advanced stages of proficiency.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    For written input there are standard measures of readability, such as the Dale-Chall formula.

    “In the case of written input there are standard measures of readability, for example, the Dale-Chall formula (1948).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dale-Chall formula (1948)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Focused tasks allow for intensive corrective feedback directed at a target structure, and such feedback is effective.

    “They allow for intensive corrective feedback directed at a target structure and, as is now well-established, such feedback is effective (Lyster, Saito and Sato, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lyster, Saito and Sato, 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    A clear distinction should be made between design and implementation variables, and a task, being a workplan, should be specified solely in terms of its design features.

    “My proposal is that a clear distinction should be made between design and implementation variables and that 'task' is a workplan and so should be specified solely in terms of its design features.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The issues in designing and implementing TBLT courses often reflect differing positions among TBLT advocates, which suggests a need for debate and, if possible, consensus.

    “In many cases, these issues concern different positions among advocates of TBLT, suggesting the need to debate them and, if possible, arrive at some consensus.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A theory of task complexity must take account of the conditions under which a task is to be performed.

    “Above all, we need to recognize that such a theory must also take account of the conditions under which a task is to be performed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Clear differences in cognitive load were evident only between the least and the most complex task, suggesting that fine gradations do not affect actual task complexity.

    “However, clear differences were only evident between the least and the most complex task, suggesting that fine gradations do not impact on the actual complexity of tasks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sasayama (2016) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Developing a task-based syllabus involves both vertical and horizontal sequencing of tasks.

    “Finally, developing a task-based syllabus involves both the vertical and horizontal sequencing of tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Skehan concludes that design features do not generate consistency or robust generalizations and that putative manipulations of task complexity may not in reality produce different levels of complexity.

    “While he does not reject the impact that design features can have on performance, he concludes that “they do not generate consistency or robust generalizations” (p.37) and that “putative manipulations of task complexity may not in reality produce different levels of complexity” (p.40)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Skehan (2016) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Input-based tasks are needed for beginners, who lack the resources to produce in the L2, and they supply comprehensible input that helps learners get started in learning an L2.

    “Input-based tasks are needed for beginners, who lack the resources to produce in the L2; they provide learners with the comprehensible input that helps get them started in learning an L2.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is difficult to see how a task can be designed based solely on two of the many factors that make up the resource-directing and resource-dispersion variables in Robinson's model.

    “It is difficult to see how a task can be designed based solely on two of the many factors [1] that comprise the resource directing and resource-dispersion variables in Robinson's model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Output-based tasks provide greater opportunities for negotiation of meaning and of form, which have been shown to promote L2 acquisition.

    “They provide greater opportunities for the negotiation of meaning (Long, 1996) and of form (Lyster, 2001), which have been shown to promote L2 acquisition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Long, 1996 source
    • cites Lyster, 2001 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Skehan (2016) makes a clear distinction between design and implementation options.

    “Skehan (2016) makes a clear distinction between design and implementation options.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Skehan (2016) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    A pedagogic task lacks situational authenticity but aims at interactional authenticity.

    “A pedagogic task lacks situational authenticity but aims at interactional authenticity (i.e. the kind of natural language processing found in communication in the world outside the classroom).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Robinson's work on task complexity appears to be primarily concerned with horizontal sequencing, but vertical sequencing also needs to be considered.

    “Robinson's work on task complexity appears to be primarily concerned with horizontal sequencing but clearly we also need to consider vertical sequencing as well.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Older readability measures were limited because they were based only on vocabulary level and sentence length.

    “A limitation of these older measures is that they were based on vocabulary level and sentence length only.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Whether tasks are defined as real-life tasks with both situational and interactional authenticity or as pedagogic tasks with only interactional authenticity must depend on the instructional context.

    “Whether tasks are to be defined as real-life tasks that have both situational and interactional authenticity or as pedagogic tasks that have interactional authenticity but no situational authenticity must surely depend on the instructional context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    In the pure TBLT promoted by Long, there is no room for explicit instruction preceding the performance of a task.

    “In 'pure' TBLTthe kind that Long (2015) promotesthere is no room for explicit instruction preceding the performance of a task.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Long (2015)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The main problem for task complexity arises in determining the complexity of output tasks.

    “The main problem arises when it comes to determining the complexity of output tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    A focused task must satisfy the same criteria as an unfocused task.

    “A focused task, of course, must satisfy the same criteria as an unfocused task.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Little progress on task complexity is likely until some fundamental issues have been addressed.

    “To my mind, however, little progress is likely until some fundamental issues have been addressed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Although TBLT advocates acknowledge that both input-based and output-based tasks have a role, TBLT is nearly always discussed and researched in terms of output-based tasks.

    “Advocates of TBLT acknowledge that both input-based and output-based tasks have a role to play but, in fact, TBLT is nearly always discussed and researched in terms of output-based tasks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A needs-based syllabus is not feasible for young foreign language learners.

    “Cameron (2001), for example, argued that a needs-based syllabus is not feasible for young foreign language learners.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cameron (2001) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    There are established ways of determining the complexity of input.

    “There are established ways of determining the complexity of input.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Existing typologies of task types lack a principled way of classifying tasks.

    “What is lacking is a principled way of classifying such tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    This typology of corrective feedback strategies has provided a basis for making and testing theory-based claims about the efficacy of different types of feedback.

    “This typology of corrective feedback strategies has provided a basis for making and testing theory-based claims about the efficacy of different types of feedback.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Both focus on form and focus on forms can result in the kind of L2 knowledge, implicit or automatized explicit, that enables learners to communicate fluently and accurately.

    “If we accept that both focus on form and focus on forms can result in the kind of L2 knowledge (implicit or automatized explicit knowledge) that enables learners to communicate fluently and accuratelyand there is plenty of evidence to support thisthen we still need to ask whether, in the long term, one approach is more effective or efficient than the other.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Immediate online focus on form seems preferable because of the psycholinguistic importance of learning through interaction and because TBLT research has studied it.

    “It would seem that immediate, online focus on form is preferred given the psycholinguistic importance attached to learning-through-interaction and the fact that the TBLT research has investigated this.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Taken together, the two studies suggest that reactive focus on form facilitates learning and that pre-emptive focus on form, especially when student-initiated, is beneficial.

    “Taken, together, these two studies suggest that, as Long claims, reactive focus on form facilitates learning, but also that preemptive focus on form, especially when initiated by students, is beneficial.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Implicit feedback caters to implicit learning, whereas explicit feedback is more likely to result in the conscious attention to form that Schmidt saw as important for acquisition and explicit learning.

    “Theoretical arguments can also be made for implicit and explicit feedback; implicit feedback caters to implicit learning whereas explicit feedback is more likely to result in the conscious attention to form that Schmidt (2001) saw as important for acquisition and explicit learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schmidt (2001) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    The two dimensions of feedback intersect, so each feedback strategy can be classified as input-providing or output-prompting and as implicit or explicit.

    “These two dimensions of feedback intersect so each feedback strategy can be classified in terms of whether it is input-providing or output-prompting and implicit or explicit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    An obvious way to facilitate intentional initial perception of new forms in the input is through explicit instruction.

    “An obvious way to achieve this is through explicit instruction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Long now regards explicit grammar rules as acceptable when they respond to problems arising during communication.

    “He currently considers the provision of explicit grammar rules as legitimate so long as this occurs in response to problems that arise during communication.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Long, 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Whether and to what extent explicit instruction interferes with how a task is performed is an important issue for TSLT.

    “Whether and to what extent explicit instruction 'interferes' in the way a task is performed is an important issues for TSLT.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In Li and Ellis's study, the explicit instruction group produced language that was less complex and fluent and that also tended to be less accurate overall.

    “In this study, however, the explicit instruction did have an effect on global complexity, accuracy and fluency with the explicit instruction group producing language that was less complex and fluent and that also tended to be less accurate overall.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Li and Ellis

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mochizuki and Ortega (2008) found that a group given a hand-out with explicit information about English relative clauses produced more than twice as many relative clauses in a focused task as a group without the hand-out, with no difference between groups in global complexity and fluency.

    “Mochizuki and Ortega (2008) reported that a group that received a hand-out providing explicit information about English relative clauses produced more than twice as many relative clauses when they performed the focused task than a group that did not receive the hand-out but that there was no difference in the global complexity and fluency of the production of the two groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mochizuki and Ortega (2008) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Long's earlier support for recasts as implicit feedback is less visible in his later work, partly because he now views feedback as serving both intentional and incidental learning.

    “Long's early commitment to recasts as an implicit form of feedback (see Long, 1996;2006) is less evident in his later publications (Long, 2015) in part because he now sees feedback as catering to intentional learning as well as to incidental learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Long, 1996;2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Long, 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It would be unwise to dismiss pre-emptive focus on form.

    “Given that students (adult ones at least) tend to naturally topicalize problematic linguistic points during the performance of a task it would seem unwise to dismiss preemptive focus on form.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Students, at least adult ones, tend to naturally topicalize problematic linguistic points during the performance of a task.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Preparatory Attention and Memory Theory also claims that learners performing a difficult task realize they lack crucial information and are more likely to attend to it when it later becomes available.

    “This theory also claims that when learners perform a difficult task they will realize they lack crucial information and thus are more likely to pay attention to this information when it is subsequently made available to them.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Quinn (2014)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Ellis, Basturkmen and Loewen (2001) distinguished pre-emptive and reactive form-focused episodes occurring in task-based lessons.

    “Ellis, Basturkmen and Loewen (2001) distinguished pre-emptive and reactive form-focused episodes (FFEs) that occurred in task-based lessons.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ellis, Basturkmen and Loewen (2001) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Delayed feedback remains reactive if it addresses linguistic problems that arose during task performance.

    “It is worth noting, though, that delayed feedback is still 'reactive' as long as it addresses linguistic problems that arose during the performance of the task.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In task-supported language teaching, specific linguistic forms are first taught explicitly and then practised in real operating conditions using tasks.

    “In contrast, in task-supported language teaching (TSLT), specific linguistic forms are first taught explicitly and then practised in “real operating conditions” using tasks (DeKeyser, 1998).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites DeKeyser, 1998

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Long supports using a range of feedback strategies, a position also taken by Ellis (2009) and Lyster and Ranta (2013).

    “In other words, he advocates a variety of feedback strategiesa view echoed by Ellis (2009) and Lyster and Ranta (2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ellis (2009) source
    • cites Lyster and Ranta (2013)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Reactive focus on form mainly consists of corrective feedback.

    “Reactive focus on form mainly consists of corrective feedback.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Preparatory Attention and Memory Theory proposes that learning improves when attention is complete rather than divided among multiple goals.

    “Quinn (2014), drew on Preparatory Attention and Memory Theory, which proposes that learning is enhanced when complete attention is available rather than divided between multiple goals.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Quinn (2014)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Successful uptake was more likely to occur in learner-initiated pre-emptive and in reactive form-focused episodes than in teacher-initiated pre-emptive episodes.

    “They reported that successful uptake was more likely to occur in learner-initiated pre-emptive and in reactive FFEs than in teacher-initiated pre-emptive FFEs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ellis, Basturkmen and Loewen (2001) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Teachers are likely to use a range of feedback strategies naturally rather than relying on only one type.

    “Second, teachers are likely to quite naturally employ a variety of strategies rather than stick to a single type”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Even if tasks in TSLT result in better learning of the target structure, they will not provide the same opportunities for natural language use and may in the long term be less successful in developing all-round L2 proficiency.

    “Even if they result in better learning of the target structure, they will not provide the same opportunities for natural language use and thus, in the long term, may be less successful in developing all round proficiency in the L2.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Of the 448 form-focused episodes identified in 12 hours of teaching, 165 were student-initiated pre-emptive, 41 were teacher-initiated pre-emptive, and 223 were reactive.

    “In the 448 FFEs Ellis et al identified in 12 hours of teaching, 165 were student-initiated pre-emptive FFEs, 41 pre-emptive teacher-initiated FFEs and 223 reactive FFEs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ellis et al

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    A common pedagogical recommendation is that feedback should be immediate in accuracy work but delayed in fluency work.

    “a common position in the pedagogical advice given to teachers is that feedback should be immediate in accuracy work but delayed in fluency work (Hedge, 2000;Scrivener, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hedge, 2000
    • cites Scrivener, 2005

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Long (2006) claimed that recasts are more likely to promote acquisition because they provide positive input for new features, and disputed whether uptake of feedback has any utility.

    “Long (2006), however, claimed that recasts are more likely to promote acquisition as they provide learners with positive input for 'new' features and disputed whether the uptake of feedback has any utility.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Long (2006)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Research indicates that recasts tend to be the most common feedback in meaning-focused interaction elicited by tasks.

    “although research does suggest that recasts tend to predominate in the meaning-focused interactions that tasks elicit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    It is notoriously difficult to devise tests that provide separate measures of explicit and implicit knowledge.

    “This question is notoriously difficult to address given the difficulty in devising tests that afford separate measures of explicit and implicit knowledge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    TSLT's ability to result in unplanned use occurs only when massive practice of the target feature is provided, which is not feasible if teachers must cover all the linguistic features listed in the syllabus.

    “Long does not deny this but argues that it only occurs when massive practice of the target feature found such as that found in Day and Shapson (1994) and Harley (1989) is provided, which he suggests is not feasible if teachers need to cover all the linguistic features listed in the syllabus.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Day and Shapson (1994)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Harley (1989) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Key features of successful innovation include teacher dissatisfaction with current practice, feasibility in context, match with student needs, ease of understanding principles and procedures, required originality, and teacher ownership.

    “These included the teacher's dissatisfaction his/her current practice, the feasibility of the new approach in the particular context in which the teacher works, the extent to which the new approach is seen as matching the needs of the students, how easy the principles and procedures of the new approach are to grasp, the extent to which teachers are required to demonstrate a high degree of original”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ellis (1997)
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Prabhu (1987) recognized that a new pedagogy is an unsettling intruder into teachers' mental frames because it conflicts with old perceptions and threatens routines and security.

    “A new perception of pedagogy, implying a different pattern of classroom activity, is an intruder into teachers' mental framesan unsettling one, because there is a conflict of mismatch between the old and new perceptions and, more seriously a threat to prevailing routines and to the sense of security dependent on them.(p.105).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Prabhu (1987)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Quinn (2014) randomly assigned 90 intermediate adult ESL learners to immediate, delayed, and no-feedback conditions.

    “In Quinn (2014) 90 intermediate-level adult ESL learners were randomly assigned to immediate, delayed and no feedback conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Quinn (2014)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Group work may not be the best way to introduce TBLT to students whose prior instruction was only traditional lockstep teaching.

    “I have also argued that using group work may not be the best way to introduce students to TBLT if their previous experience of classroom instruction consisted only of traditional, lockstep teaching.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Longitudinal studies are needed to establish transferability.

    “Again, to establish transferability longitudinal studies are needed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    TBLT aims at integrative, holistic learning and cannot be assessed with discrete-point tests, which would also harm teaching through negative washback.

    “TBLT is directed at integrative, holistic learning and cannot be assessed through discrete-point tests, which if used would also have a negative wash-back effect on teaching.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Input-based tasks are easier to assess by checking whether learners achieve the task outcome.

    “Input-based tasks can be assessed more easily in terms of whether learners achieve the outcome of the task (e.g. can correctly draw in the route described on a map).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Such studies were generally conducted in laboratory settings and with intermediate or advanced learners.

    “However, in general studies such as these were carried out in a laboratory setting and with intermediate or advanced level learners.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    TBLT, with its focus on holistic teaching and learning by doing, is a major innovation for many teachers.

    “TBLT, with its emphasis on holistic teaching and learning-through-doing constitutes a major innovation for many teachers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Li, Zhu and Ellis (2016) conducted a classroom-based study.

    “Li, Zhu and Ellis (2016) reported a classroom-based study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Li, Zhu and Ellis (2016) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Adams (2007) concluded that learner-learner interaction may offer a site for feedback, but the limited range of feedback types may not meet learners' developmental needs.

    “while learner-learner interactions may provide a site for feedback to occur, the restricted set of feedback types may not provide evidence appropriate to learner developmental needs”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Adams (2007)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This misconception may have arisen because much research has studied learners performing tasks in pairs or groups.

    “This misconception may again have arisen because so much of the research has investigated how learners perform tasks in pairs or groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    More evidence is needed on how common and facilitative focus on form is in different participatory structures.

    “More evidence is needed to show how far focus on form is common and facilitative of learning in different participatory structures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Students may not be convinced that the incidental learning TBLT provides is the most efficient way to learn an L2.

    “Students may be unconvinced that the incidental learning that TBLT caters to is the most efficient way of learning an L2.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Van den Branden's (2006) account of implementing TBLT in Flanders provides an excellent model of successful introduction.

    “An excellent model of how TBLT can be successfully introduced can be found in Van den Branden's (2006) account of its implementation in Flanders (Belgium).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Van den Branden's (2006)
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    It is unreasonable to expect beginner learners to do speaking tasks in groups because they lack proficiency and will use L1 or produce restricted, pidgin-like output.

    “As I mentioned above, it is not reasonable to expect beginner-level learners to perform speaking tasks in groups as they lack the necessary proficiency and thus will resort to their L1 or else produce the kind of restricted, pidgin-like output that Seedhouse (1999) was critical of.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Seedhouse (1999)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    A common misconception about TBLT is that it must involve small group work.

    “A common misconception about TBLT is that it must involve small group work.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The benefits of small group work are well documented.

    “The advantages of small group work are well-documentedsee, for example, Long and Porter (1985).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Long and Porter (1985)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The primed repetition in McDonough and Mackey (2006) could be considered closer to an immediate than a delayed response.

    “However, it could be argued that the 'primed repetition' in this study was closer to an immediate than a delayed response.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McDonough and Mackey (2006) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In TBLT the accuracy-fluency distinction does not apply because the aim is to develop both together.

    “In TBLT, however, the distinction between accuracy and fluency work does not apply as the goal is to develop accuracy and fluency contiguously.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    There is tension in TBLT between the claim that tasks promote effective learning and the actual demonstration that what is learned transfers to a new task.

    “There is a tension in TBLT circles between the emphasis on how tasks can promote and effective learning and the actual demonstration of this in terms of the transferability of whatever is learned to a new task.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    A needs-analysis approach is not feasible in contexts such as the state educational systems in East Asia that the author knows.

    “I have argued such an approach is not feasible in contexts such as the state educational systems in East Asia that I am familiar with.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The author has argued for a hybrid syllabus with a main task-based component supported by a task-supported component to address persistent linguistic problems when they appear.

    “It is for this reason that I have argued for a hybrid syllabus consisting primarily of a task-based component but supported by a task-supported component to address recalcitrant linguistic problems when these become evident.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The final real issue is how to design courses that are task-based but also include opportunities to work on specific linguistic problems through task-supported teaching.

    “To my mind, then, the final 'real issue' that has to be addressed is how to design courses that are task-based but that also build in, where needed, opportunities for working on specific linguistic problems through task-supported teaching.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    Critics of TBLT are unlikely to be convinced until there are more studies like Shintani (2016), which provided evidence that TBLT can be more effective than traditional structural teaching.

    “Critics of TBLT are unlikely to be convinced until there are more studies like Shintani (2016), who produced evidence that TBLT can be more effective than traditional, structural teaching.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shintani (2016) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Long's version of TBLT stresses needs-analysis to identify target tasks relevant to a specific learner group.

    “Whereas Long's version of TBLT emphasizes the importance of needs-analysis to identify the target tasks relevant to a specific group of learners”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Long

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Successful L2 acquisition requires incidental learning through task-based teaching but can also benefit from the skill development that task-supported teaching offers.

    “Successful L2 acquisition clearly does call for learning incidentally through task-based teaching but it can also benefit from the skill-development that task-supported teaching can provide.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationnone given

    Doubts about TBLT will continue until it is shown to be effective not only in communicative ability but also in linguistic accuracy.

    “Doubts will also continue to exist until it can be shown that TBLT is effectivenot just in developing communicative ability but also in achieving linguistic accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    These misconceptions partly result from the kind of research on tasks, which is often laboratory-based and often focuses on single task performance.

    “In part these are the product of the kind of research that has investigated tasksoften laboratory-based and often focusing on the performance of single tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These misconceptions are likely to persist until there are more accounts of full task-based courses.

    “These misconceptions are likely to prevail until there are more accounts of full task-based courses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Task-based and task-supported teaching rest on different psycholinguistic rationales, but this does not mean only one should be chosen.

    “Task-based and task-supported teaching draw on different psycholinguistic rationalesas Long (2015) pointed outbut it does not follow that we should opt for just one of these.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Long (2015)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

126 of 126
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Learners have wants as well as needs.

    “One problem is that learners have wants as well as needs and that good language teaching should go beyond addressing purely functional needs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Certain linguistic features constitute learning problems that persist even at advanced stages of proficiency.

    “It is well-known that certain linguistic features (e.g.subject-verb agreement and complex structures such as hypothetical conditionals), constitute learning problems that continue even at advanced stages.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Students, at least adult ones, tend to naturally topicalize problematic linguistic points during the performance of a task.

    “Given that students (adult ones at least) tend to naturally topicalize problematic linguistic points during the performance of a task it would seem unwise to dismiss preemptive focus on form.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    A task-based syllabus should progress from simple to complex.

    “The issue of task complexity is important for syllabus design if one accepts the basic premise that there should be a progression from 'simple' to 'complex'.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Manipulating task design features and implementation options can prioritize learners' attention to complexity, accuracy and fluency and over time help them achieve balanced proficiency.

    “Much of the TBLT research has been premised on the assumption that by manipulating task design features and implementation options (such as pre-task planning) it is possible to prioritize the”
5 of 5

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Seedhouse citation year differs from the reference

    Minor

    The discussion cites Seedhouse with a 1999 date, but the listed Seedhouse reference is dated 1997.

  • Lyster, Saito and Sato citation year differs from the reference

    Minor

    The text cites this author group with a 2012 date, but its reference-list entry is dated 2013.

  • Form-focused episode counts fall short of the stated total

    Minor

    The three reported categories sum to 429 episodes, not 448. The text does not account for the remaining 19.

    Reported 448 · recomputed 429

  • Jobard citation year differs from the reference

    Minor

    The in-text citation gives 2006, whereas the listed Jobard et al. reference gives 2007.

  • Day and Shapson citation year differs from the reference

    Minor

    The text cites Day and Shapson as a 1994 study, but the reference list gives 1991 for these authors.

  • Basturkmen, Loewen and Ellis citation year differs from the reference

    Minor

    The in-text citation says 2006, while the reference-list entry for these authors says 2004.

6 of 6

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Adams, 2007, Conversational interaction in second language learning, 29
  2. Dale, 1948, A formula for predicting readability: Instructions, Educational Research Bulletin, 27, 37
  3. Long, 2006, Problems in SLA
  4. Swain, 1998, Focus-on-form in classroom second language acquisition, 64
  5. Doughty, 1998, Focus on form in classroom second language, 114

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellis, R.
Affiliations
Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Ellis, Rod
Venue
Language Teaching
Published
2017-09-14
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
507-526
ISSN
  • 0261-4448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3049
OpenAlex
W2754116647
Cited by
267
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2
FWCI
98.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Language Teaching (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
task-based language teaching, task definition, form-focused instruction, task complexity, task sequencing, explicit instruction, teacher professional development, language syllabus design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-01.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-01.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review