Cited by 64Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Implementing screening and brief alcohol interventions in primary care: views from both sides of the consultation

Open access
Hutchings, Deborah, Cassidy, Paul, Dallolio, Emma, Pearson, Pauline, Heather, Nick, Kaner, Eileen·2006·Primary Health Care Research & Development

Abstract

Excessive drinking is a global health problem which is responsible for a wide range of both chronic and acute illness, and which costs the UK National Health Service (NHS) £1.7 billion annually. Current health policy aims to reduce alcohol-related problems by promoting early identification of risk followed by brief intervention to facilitate positive changes in drinking level or patterns of consumption. However, practical and philosophical barriers concerning screening and brief alcohol intervention have so far impeded its uptake in routine primary care. This qualitative study aimed to simultaneously explore and compare health professionals’ and patients’ views on the acceptability and feasibility of screening and brief alcohol intervention in primary care. Focus groups were held with (a) four primary care teams, (b) two general practitioner (GP) and two nurse groups and (c) six patient groups in the north-east of England. A thematic framework approach was used to analyse audio-taped data via transcripts. Both health professionals and patients reported that raising and discussing alcohol-related risk was acceptable in primary care, when combined with other lifestyle issues or linked to relevant health conditions. Targeted rather than universal screening was the most acceptable method of identifying alcohol-related risk and would fit well with existing practice. However, there was uncertainty among health professionals about the effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions and some disagreement with patients concerning who was best placed to deliver them. Health professionals felt that nurses were best placed for such work whilst patients reported that they would initially raise the subject with GPs. There was broad acceptance of brief intervention approaches but a lack of support and specific incentives for this work impeded its delivery in routine practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1191/1463423606pc292oa

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hutchings, D., Cassidy, P., Dallolio, E., Pearson, P., Heather, N., & Kaner, E.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Alcohol and Drug Studies
  • Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Northumbria University (GB)
Venue
Primary Health Care Research & Development
Published
2006-07
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
221-229
ISSN
  • 1463-4236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-1128
OpenAlex
W2109828082
Cited by
64
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Primary Health Care Research & Development (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
screening and brief intervention, alcohol screening, brief alcohol intervention, primary care, excessive drinking, alcohol-related harm, acceptability, feasibility, health professionals' views, patient perspectives, targeted screening, nurses, general practitioners, implementation barriers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review