Implementing screening and brief alcohol interventions in primary care: views from both sides of the consultation
Open accessAbstract
Excessive drinking is a global health problem which is responsible for a wide range of both chronic and acute illness, and which costs the UK National Health Service (NHS) £1.7 billion annually. Current health policy aims to reduce alcohol-related problems by promoting early identification of risk followed by brief intervention to facilitate positive changes in drinking level or patterns of consumption. However, practical and philosophical barriers concerning screening and brief alcohol intervention have so far impeded its uptake in routine primary care. This qualitative study aimed to simultaneously explore and compare health professionals’ and patients’ views on the acceptability and feasibility of screening and brief alcohol intervention in primary care. Focus groups were held with (a) four primary care teams, (b) two general practitioner (GP) and two nurse groups and (c) six patient groups in the north-east of England. A thematic framework approach was used to analyse audio-taped data via transcripts. Both health professionals and patients reported that raising and discussing alcohol-related risk was acceptable in primary care, when combined with other lifestyle issues or linked to relevant health conditions. Targeted rather than universal screening was the most acceptable method of identifying alcohol-related risk and would fit well with existing practice. However, there was uncertainty among health professionals about the effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions and some disagreement with patients concerning who was best placed to deliver them. Health professionals felt that nurses were best placed for such work whilst patients reported that they would initially raise the subject with GPs. There was broad acceptance of brief intervention approaches but a lack of support and specific incentives for this work impeded its delivery in routine practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GPs and nurses often cited improving professional teamwork as a facilitator.
“GPs and nurses often cited improving professional teamwork (e.g. having a practice nurse delivering SBI, having receptionists giving patients screening tools) as a facilitator [39, 41, 54, 70, 71, 73, 76, 80, 91, 93, 97, 99].”
GPs and nurses reported more training for improving counselling skills and feedback on successful cases as facilitators.
“GPs and nurses reported more training for improving counselling skills [20, 49, 78, 83] and feedback on successful cases [71] as facilitators.”
More information about the effectiveness of brief interventions and feedback on successful cases were identified as implementation facilitators.
“More information about the effectiveness of brief interventions [23, 36, 39, 47, 78, 84, 87, 92] and feedback on successful cases [71, 109] were identified as implementation facilitators.”
More training for improving counselling skills and feedback on successful cases were reported as facilitators.
“More training for improving counselling skills [49, 78] and feedback on successful cases [71] were reported as facilitators.”
Better co-operation with specialized services, involving other professionals in general practice, public health educational campaigns, and more media attention were among the most commonly cited facilitators.
“Better co-operation with specialized services [20, 39, 59, 60, 80], involving other professionals in general practice (e.g. an addiction consultant or a specialized nurse) [39, 71, 105], public health educational campaigns [23, 47, 78, 99, 110] and more media attention [39, 110] were among the most commonly cited facilitators.”
Cites
SAUNDERS, J. B., AASLAND, O. G., BABOR, T. F., DE LA FUENTE, J. R., & GRANT, M. (1993) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x · Cited by 13,482 · see citing works
Moyer, A., Finney, J. W., Swearingen, C. E., & Vergun, P. (2002) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00018.x · Cited by 1,092 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…is a secondary prevention approach in which hazardous and harmful drinkers receive personalized feedback about their drinking and simple structured advice about how to reduce alcohol-related risk; the goal is generally reduced, or non-problem drinking, as opposed to abstinence (Moyer et al., 2002).”
BackgroundLock, C. A., Kaner, E., Lamont, S., & Bond, S. (2002) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02294.x · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Self-citationManaging alcohol problems in general practice.
Anderson, P. (1985) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.290.6485.1873 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
May, C., Rapley, T., & Kaner, E. (2006) · Addiction Research & Theory · doi:10.1080/16066350600609883 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Johnson, M., Jackson, R., Guillaume, L., Meier, P., & Goyder, E. (2011) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdq095 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Alcohol use disorders and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Roerecke, M., & Rehm, J. (2013) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.12231 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Rosário, F., Santos, M. I., Angus, K., Pas, L., Ribeiro, C., & Fitzgerald, N. (2021) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-020-01073-0 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
“GPs and nurses reported more training for improving counselling skills [20, 49, 78, 83] and feedback on successful cases [71] as facilitators.”
BackgroundInfluentialBrown, J., West, R., Angus, C., Beard, E., Brennan, A., Drummond, C., Hickman, M., Holmes, J., Kaner, E., & Michie, S. (2016) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp16x683149 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Self-citationPackages of care for alcohol use disorders in low- and middle-income countries
Benegal, V., Chand, P. K., & Obot, I. S. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000170 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Nilsen, P., Kaner, E., & Babor, T. F. (2008) · Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · doi:10.1177/145507250802500608 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationStaton, C. A., Vissoci, J. R. N., Wojcik, R., Hirshon, J. M., Mvungi, M., Mmbaga, B. T., & Swahn, M. (2018) · Alcohol · doi:10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.01.003 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hutchings, D., Cassidy, P., Dallolio, E., Pearson, P., Heather, N., & Kaner, E.
- Affiliations
- Centre for Alcohol and Drug Studies
- Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Northumbria University (GB)
- Venue
- Primary Health Care Research & Development
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 221-229
- ISSN
- 1463-4236 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-1128
- OpenAlex
- W2109828082
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Primary Health Care Research & Development (publishedVersion)
- Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Keywords
- screening and brief intervention, alcohol screening, brief alcohol intervention, primary care, excessive drinking, alcohol-related harm, acceptability, feasibility, health professionals' views, patient perspectives, targeted screening, nurses, general practitioners, implementation barriers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review