Cited by 22Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareLanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies

Clinical reasoning, clinical trials and risky drinkers in everyday primary care: A qualitative study of British general practitioners

Open access
May, Carl, Rapley, Tim, Kaner, Eileen·2006·Addiction Research & Theory

Abstract

Alcohol and other substance misuse problems have historically been seen as refractory in primary care, but in the past 20 years Brief Interventions have come to be seen as an important and effective response to a range of problems around ‘risky drinking’. Proponents of brief interventions have argued that these interventions are best accomplished in the community, but that primary health care professionals resist using them. This qualitative study investigated responses to alcohol problems in a maximum variation sample of 28 primary care professionals in and around a northern English city. We found clinicians negotiating alcohol problems using interactional techniques that integrated elements of brief interventions, and which fitted these to the interactional and temporal order of clinical encounters and physician–patient relationships in primary care. Central to these accounts was the problem of finding an interactional solution that drew together notions of what was both ethically and practically possible in any given encounter.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16066350600609883

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
May, C., Rapley, T., & Kaner, E.
Affiliations
Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
May, Carl
Venue
Addiction Research & Theory
Published
2006-01
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
387-397
ISSN
  • 1058-6989 (ISSN-L)
  • 1606-6359
  • 1476-7392
OpenAlex
W2124907218
Cited by
22
References
39
Citations by year
2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction Research & Theory (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Keywords
hazardous drinking, brief intervention, alcohol abuse, general practitioners, primary care, clinical reasoning, physician-patient relationship, patient encounters, clinical ethics, alcohol screening

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review