Breathing techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
Abstract
Background Breathing techniques are included in the rehabilitation program of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The efficacy of breathing techniques aiming at improving symptoms of dyspnea and eliciting physiological effects is discussed in this paper. In patients with COPD, breathing techniques aim to relieve symptoms and ameliorate adverse physiological effects by: 1) increasing strength and endurance of the respiratory muscles; 2) optimizing the pattern of thoracoabdominal motion; and 3) reducing dynamic hyperinflation of the rib cage and improving gas exchange. Evidence exists to support the effectiveness of pursed lips breathing, forward leaning position, active expiration and inspiratory muscle training, but not for diaphragmatic breathing. Careful patient selection, proper and repeated instruction and control of the techniques, and assessment of the effects are necessary. Despite the evidence that breathing techniques are effective, several problems need to be resolved. The limited evidence for the transfer of the effects of breathing techniques during resting conditions to exercise conditions raises several questions. Do breathing techniques have to be practiced during activities of daily living?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Therapies already target thoracic dominant breathing in patients with COPD with improvements in quality of life scales.
“Therapies already target thoracic dominant breathing in patients with COPD with improvements in quality of life scales [62].”
From Dysfunctional breathing: a review of the literature and proposal for classification (2016) · cites this paper as [62]
Cites
Belman, M. J., Botnick, W. C., & Shin, J. W. (1996) · American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.153.3.8630581 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dysfunctional breathing: a review of the literature and proposal for classification
Boulding, R., Stacey, R., Niven, R., & Fowler, S. J. (2016) · European Respiratory Review · doi:10.1183/16000617.0088-2015 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Tailoring cognitive-behavioral therapy to treat anxiety comorbid with advanced cancer
Greer, J. A., Park, E. R., Prigerson, H. G., & Safren, S. A. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.24.4.294 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gosselink, R.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Gosselink, R
- ORCID
- Gosselink, R
- Venue
- Chronic Respiratory Disease
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 163-172
- ISSN
- 1479-9723 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-9731
- OpenAlex
- W2116978529
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 0.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chronic Respiratory Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Keywords
- breathing exercises, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pursed-lip breathing, active expiration, inspiratory muscle training, diaphragmatic breathing, dyspnea, respiratory muscle strength, thoracoabdominal motion, dynamic hyperinflation, gas exchange, pulmonary rehabilitation
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Respiratory Therapy, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review