The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stalking risks to celebrities and public figures
Abstract
SUMMARY: Prominent figures are frequently subjected to unwanted and intrusive attentions. Such stalking behaviour is often driven by psychotic illness, angrily blaming the public figure for delusional persecution (resentful motivation), or based on erotomanic delusions (intimacy seeking motivation), for example. This behaviour can cause psychological harm to both perpetrator and victim, and is unlawful. In the rare instances where a public figure has been attacked, the perpetrator has usually had a history of such stalking behaviour and of severe mental illness. For these reasons, early identification and diversion into appropriate care and treatment will be for the benefit of both parties and will prevent more serious violence in a minority of cases. The importance of the provision of education to improve both reporting rates by victims and an appropriate response from the criminal justice system is highlighted. A multi-agency approach involving the criminal justice system and mental health services is the most effective means of achieving these aims. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: •Learn that severe mental illness, particularly psychosis, is often an important driver of stalking behaviour •Learn that delusional disorder is a treatable mental illness •Appreciate that prevention rather than prediction is the approach to managing the risks of high-harm low-probability outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This aligns with clinical literature explaining that delusional disorders are often highly encapsulated, meaning individuals can function normally in daily life and do not present significant behavioural problems, and can therefore evade identification or judgements by professionals that treatment is necessary (James, Kerrigan et al., 2010;Wilson et al., 2018).”
From Unmet needs: analysing the Fixated Threat Assessment Centre’s fulfilment of the public health approach, and its value for violence prevention (2025) · cites this paper as Wilson et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- 10.1192/pb.37.10.340 · DOI
- Warren, 2014, International Handbook of Threat Assessment
- 10.1080/14789949.2012.727453 · DOI · Paper page
- Spores, 1988, Running Amok: An Historical Inquiry
- 10.1080/14789949.2015.1054857 · DOI
- 10.1080/14789940412331313368 · DOI
- 10.1192/pb.bp.115.053017 · DOI
- 10.1080/14789940802197074 · DOI
- 10.1037/tam0000024 · DOI
- 10.1002/bsl.999 · DOI
- McCauley, 2013, Characteristics of lone-wolf violent offenders: a comparison of assassins and school attackers, Perspectives on Terrorism, 7, 4
- MacKenzie, 2009, The Stalking Risk Profile: Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Stalkers
- 10.1080/14789949.2015.1124908 · DOI
- James, 2008, Attacks on the British royal family: the role of psychotic illness, Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 36, 59
- Hoffmann, 2008, Stalking, Threatening, and Attacking Public Figures
- 10.1520/JFS14732J · DOI
- 10.1007/s001270050210 · DOI
- 10.1520/JFS14457J · DOI
- 2017, Making Prevention a Reality: Identifying, Assessing, and Managing the Threat of Targeted Attacks
- 10.1037/tam0000016 · DOI
- 10.1093/med:psych/9780195326383.001.0001 · DOI
- Dietz, 1991, Threatening and otherwise inappropriate letters to Hollywood celebrities, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 36, 185, 10.1520/JFS13019J · DOI
- 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.12 · DOI
- 10.1201/b19689 · DOI
- Mullen, 2009, Stalkers and their Victims
- 10.1002/bsl.2255 · DOI
- 10.1177/070674370605100207 · DOI
- Dietz, 1991, Threatening and otherwise inappropriate letters to members of the United States Congress, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 36, 1445, 10.1520/JFS13165J · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.01077.x · DOI · Paper page
- Dunn, 2014, International Handbook of Threat Assessment
- 10.1017/S003329170700181X · DOI
- 10.1080/14789949.2014.981564 · DOI
- 2016, Compendium: Intimate Personal Violence and Partner Abuse
- 10.1080/1057610X.2015.1008341 · DOI
- James, 2014, International Handbook of Threat Assessment
- 10.1192/pb.bp.110.033910 · DOI
- 10.1192/bjp.184.4.352 · DOI
- 2017, Confidentiality: Good Practice in Handling Patient Information
- Hacking, 1998, Mad Travellers: Reflections on the Reality of Transient Mental Illnesses
- Jay, 2012, The Influencing Machine: James Tilly Matthews and the Air Loom
- MacDonald, 1968, Homicidal Threats
- 10.1177/0004867415581022 · DOI
- 10.1192/pb.36.6.236 · DOI
- Malsch, 2002, Stalking van bekende personen [Stalking of Well-known People]
- 10.1080/14789949.2015.1124909 · DOI
- Régis, 1890, Les régicides dans l'histoire et dans le présent: etude médico-psychologique
Cited by
Seaward, A., Marchment, Z., Wilson, S., Elfituri, S., Farnham, F., Plumb, T., Rose, K., Taylor, A., Corner, E., & Gill, P. (2025) · Psychology, Crime & Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2025.2581795 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, S., Dempsey, C., Farnham, F., Manze, T., & Taylor, A.
- Venue
- BJPsych Advances
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2018-04-25
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 152-160
- ISSN
- 2056-4678
- 2056-4686
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stalking risks to celebrities and public figures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1192/bja.2017.22
- The paper
- Wilson, S., Dempsey, C., Farnham, F., Manze, T., & Taylor, A. (2018). Stalking risks to celebrities and public figures. BJPsych Advances. https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2017.22
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.