Association between suicidal ideation and suicide: meta-analyses of odds ratios, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value
Open accessAbstract
Background: The expression of suicidal ideation is considered to be an important warning sign for suicide. However, the predictive properties of suicidal ideation as a test of later suicide are unclear. Aims: To assess the strength of the association between suicidal ideation and later suicide measured by odds ratio (OR), sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV). Method: We located English-language studies indexed in PubMed that reported the expression or non-expression of suicidal ideation among people who later died by suicide or did not. A random effects meta-analysis was used to assess the pooled OR, sensitivity, specificity and PPV of suicidal ideation for later suicide among groups of people from psychiatric and non-psychiatric settings. Results: There was a moderately strong but highly heterogeneous association between suicidal ideation and later suicide ( n = 71, OR = 3.41, 95% CI 2.59–4.49, 95% prediction interval 0.42–28.1, I 2 = 89.4, Q -value = 661, d.f.( Q ) = 70, P ≤0.001). Studies conducted in primary care and other non-psychiatric settings had similar pooled odds to studies of current and former psychiatric patients (OR = 3.86 v. OR = 3.23, P = 0.7). The pooled sensitivity of suicidal ideation for later suicide was 41% (95% CI 35–48) and the pooled specificity was 86% (95% CI 76–92), with high between-study heterogeneity. Studies of suicidal ideation expressed by current and former psychiatric patients had a significantly higher pooled sensitivity (46% v. 22%) and lower pooled specificity (81% v. 96%) than studies conducted in non-psychiatric settings. The PPV among non-psychiatric cohorts (0.3%, 95% CI 0.1%–0.5%) was significantly lower ( Q -value = 35.6, P < 0.001) than among psychiatric samples (3.9%, 95% CI 2.2–6.6). Conclusions: Estimates of the extent of the association between suicidal ideation and later suicide are limited by unexplained between-study heterogeneity. The utility of suicidal ideation as a test for later suicide is limited by a modest sensitivity and low PPV. Declaration interest: M.M.L. and C.J.R. have provided expert evidence in civil, criminal and coronial matters. I.B.H. has been a Commissioner in Australia's National Mental Health Commission since 2012. He is the Co-Director, Health and Policy at the Brain and Mind Centre (BMC) University of Sydney. The BMC operates an early-intervention youth services at Camperdown under contract to Headspace. I.B.H. has previously led community-based and pharmaceutical industry-supported (Wyeth, Eli Lily, Servier, Pfizer, AstraZeneca) projects focused on the identification and better management of anxiety and depression. He is a Board Member of Psychosis Australia Trust and a member of Veterans Mental Health Clinical Reference group. He was a member of the Medical Advisory Panel for Medibank Private until October 2017. He is the Chief Scientific Advisor to, and an equity shareholder in, InnoWell. InnoWell has been formed by the University of Sydney and PricewaterhouseCoopers to administer the $30 M Australian Government Funded Project Synergy. Project Synergy is a 3-year programme for the transformation of mental health services through the use of innovative technologies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Suicidal ideation is only modestly sensitive and has weak predictive value for suicide.
“otherwise suicidal ideation has modest sensitivity and low predictive value for suicide (259).”
From A brain-centric model of suicidal behavior (2020) · cites this paper as [259]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 95 · Cited by 212
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [23]Baader-Matthei T, Richter P, Mundt C. Suicides of psychiatric hospitalized patients and their risk factors. A Case-control study. Rev Chil Neuro-Psiquiat 2004; 42: 293– 316.
- Authors
- McHugh, C. M., Corderoy, A., Ryan, C. J., Hickie, I. B., & Large, M. M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- The University of Notre Dame Australia (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Large, Matthew Michael
- Venue
- BJPsych Open
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2019-01-31
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e18-e18
- ISSN
- 2056-4724 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6401538
- OpenAlex
- W4238249433
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 95
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 12
- FWCI
- 29.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BJPsych Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Pfizer
- AstraZeneca
- Australian Government
- Mental Health Commission
- University of Sydney
- Servier
- National Mental Health Commission
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
- Keywords
- suicidal ideation, suicide, predictive validity, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, odds ratio, psychiatric patients, primary care, suicide warning signs, diagnostic accuracy, suicide prevention workforce, suicide prevention training, suicide prevention research funding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review