Cited by 19Mental Health Treatment and AccessAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth disparities and outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Common mental illness in people with sensory impairment: results from the 2014 adult psychiatric morbidity survey

Open access

Abstract

Background: People with sensory impairments may be at increased risk of depression and anxiety but experience barriers to accessing treatment. Aims: To investigate whether people with sensory impairment have more depressive and anxiety symptoms than people without, whether this is mediated by social functioning and whether they report greater non-treatment. Method: We analysed data from the English 2014 Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey using regression models, with the Clinical Interview Schedule-Revised (CIS-R) score as the primary outcome and self-reported hearing and vision impairment as exposures. A secondary outcome was self-reported receipt of mental health diagnosis and treatment. We used structural equation modelling to assess for mediation by social functioning. Results: A total of 19.0% of people with hearing impairment, and 30.9% and 24.5% with distance and near visual impairments, respectively, had clinically significant psychological morbidity. Adjusted mean CIS-R score was 1.86 points higher in people with hearing impairment compared with those without (95% CI 1.30–2.42, P<0.001). People with distance and near vision impairment had mean CIS-R scores 3.61 (95% CI 2.58–4.63, P<0.001) and 2.74 (95% CI 2.12–3.37, P<0.001) points higher, respectively, than those without. Social functioning accounted for approximately 50% of these relationships between sensory impairment and psychological morbidity. We found no evidence of an increased treatment gap for people with sensory impairment. Conclusions: Social functioning, a potentially modifiable target, may mediate an association between sensory impairment and depressive and anxiety symptoms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjo.2019.81

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One significant contributor to JWH's outbursts was his frequently misunderstood auditory cues due to bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.

    “One significant contributor to JWH’s outbursts was his frequently misunderstood auditory cues due to his bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. 23”

    From Psychiatric care for a person with MELAS syndrome: A case report (2021) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Background states that hearing impairment can make conversations difficult to hear, supporting a general link to communication difficulties. It does not discuss JWH, bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, misunderstood auditory cues, or whether those cues contributed to his outbursts. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 2015, Stata Statistical Software: Release 14
  2. Leigh, 2011, The Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language, and Education, Volume 1, Second Edition (2 ed.), 214
  3. McManus, 2012, Circumstances of People with Sight Loss: Secondary Analysis of Understanding Society and the Life Opportunities Survey
  4. Matthews L. Hearing Loss, Tinnitus and Mental Health. A Literature Review. Action on Hearing Loss, 2013.
  5. Nelson, 1991, National Adult Reading Test (NART)
  6. McManus, 2016, NHS Digital. Mental Health and Wellbeing in England: Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shoham, N., Lewis, G., McManus, S., & Cooper, C.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • National Centre for Social research (GR)
Corresponding author
Shoham, Natalie
Venue
BJPsych Open
Published
2019-11
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
e94-e94
ISSN
2056-4724 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2984123300
Cited by
19
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJPsych Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University College London
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
sensory impairment, hearing loss, visual impairment, depression, anxiety, common mental disorders, social functioning, treatment gap, mental health service utilization, mediation, Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review