Cited by 57Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsHealth, Technology, Consumer Behavior

Beyond clicks and downloads: a call for a more comprehensive approach to measuring mobile-health app engagement

Open access
O'Brien, Heather L., Morton, Emma, Kampen, Andrea, Barnes, Steven J., Michalak, Erin E.·2020·BJPsych Open

Abstract

Downloading a mobile health (m-health) app on your smartphone does not mean you will ever use it. Telling another person about an app does not mean you like it. Using an online intervention does not mean it has had an impact on your well-being. Yet we consistently rely on downloads, clicks, ‘likes’ and other usage and popularity metrics to measure m-health app engagement. Doing so misses the complexity of how people perceive and use m-health apps in everyday life to manage mental health conditions. This article questions commonly used behavioural metrics of engagement in mental health research and care, and proposes a more comprehensive approach to measuring in-app engagement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjo.2020.72

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with BD may engage, disengage, and re-engage with apps according to the fluctuating course of illness.

    “Individuals with BD may engage, disengage, and re-engage with apps according to the fluctuating course of illness (O'Brien et al. 2020).”

    From Evaluating the quality, safety, and functionality of commonly used smartphone apps for bipolar disorder mood and sleep self-management (2022) · cites this paper as O'Brien et al. 2020

    The (Re)Defining user engagement section describes engagement, disengagement and re-engagement, while Qualifying the quantification of m-health app usage says people with chronic conditions have fluctuating needs and discusses bipolar disorder as an example. The paper does not specifically say that people with bipolar disorder cycle through those engagement stages according to the course of their illness. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]Jacques RD. The Nature of Engagement and its Role in Hypermedia Evaluation and Design (Doctoral dissertation). South Bank University, 1996.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Brien, H. L., Morton, E., Kampen, A., Barnes, S. J., & Michalak, E. E.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Michalak, Erin E.
Venue
BJPsych Open
Published
2020-08-11
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
e86-e86
ISSN
2056-4724 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3048418686
Cited by
57
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4
FWCI
6.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJPsych Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
Keywords
mobile health apps, app engagement, engagement metrics, download metrics, mental health, app usage, digital mental health interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review