The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of Research Diagnostic Systems in an Edinburgh Community Sample
Abstract
Summary: Four research diagnostic schemes are compared in one community sample. The prevalence of psychiatric disorder ranged from 8.7 per cent (ID-Catego, threshold and definite) through 13.7 per cent (RDC, probable and definite) to 20.3 per cent (Bedford, borderline and definite). The main comparison made is between the PSE/ID/Catego and SADS/RDC systems. Sixty-one per cent of cases are identified as such by both these schemes. There is poor agreement about labelling; only 56 per cent of cases of depression and 16.7 per cent of cases of anxiety are so diagnosed by both systems. A post hoc check list was used to identify Bedford cases; all bar one were found to fulfil RDC and PSE case criteria. The results are compared with those from other centres which have used the same diagnostic criteria in community studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
SCAN: Schedules fonr Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry
Wing, J. K. (1990) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1990.01810180089012 · Cited by 2,517
Regier, D. A. (1988) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800350011002 · Cited by 1,737
Detecting anxiety and depression in general medical settings.
Goldberg, D., Bridges, K., Duncan-Jones, P., & Grayson, D. (1988) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.297.6653.897 · Cited by 1,210
Gibson, J., McKenzie‐McHarg, K., Shakespeare, J., Price, J., & Gray, R. (2009) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01363.x · Cited by 991
Social support, self-esteem and depression
Brown, G. W., Andrews, B., Harris, T., Adler, Z., & Bridge, L. (1986) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700011831 · Cited by 688
Metadata
- Authors
- Dean, C., Surtees, P. G., & Sashidharan, S. P.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 1983-03
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 247-256
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2108737489
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Research Diagnostic Systems in an Edinburgh Community Sample. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1192/bjp.142.3.247
- The paper
- Dean, C., Surtees, P. G., & Sashidharan, S. P. (1983). Comparison of Research Diagnostic Systems in an Edinburgh Community Sample. British Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.142.3.247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
