The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of Cognitive Decline in the Elderly by Informant Interview
Abstract
Cognitive decline in a sample of 64 elderly people was assessed by a standardised informant interview dealing with changes in memory and intelligence which had taken place in the previous 10 years. Scores from the interview were found to correlate (r=0.74) with the Mini-Mental State Examination. Moreover, the informant interview was found to be less affected by pre-morbid ability than the MMSE. Direct assessment of decline by informants may be a solution to the problem of contamination by pre-morbid ability which affects traditional cognitive screening instruments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix
Steiger, J. H. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245 · Cited by 4,621 · cited 1×
“To see whether these pairs of correlations differed significantly, they were compared using the @‘¿ 2 statistic (Steiger, 1980).”
Method
Cited by
Lyketsos, C. G., Lopez, O., Jones, B., Fitzpatrick, A. L., Breitner, J., & DeKosky, S. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.12.1475 · Cited by 2,049
The Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE): a review
Jorm, A. F. (2004) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610204000390 · Cited by 823
“There have also been eight studies that have used the NART or other reading test as an indicator of pre-morbid ability (Christensen and Jorm, 1992; Jorm, 1994; Jorm et al., 1991; Jorm et al., 1996a; Jorm and Korten, 1988; Morales et al., 1997; Mulligan et al., 1996; Starr et al., 2000).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationPodewils, L. J. (2005) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwi092 · Cited by 675
Association of Incident Dementia With Hospitalizations
Phelan, E. A., Borson, S., Grothaus, L., Balch, S., & Larson, E. B. (2012) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1964 · Cited by 547
Newman, A. B., Fitzpatrick, A. L., Lopez, O., Jackson, S., Lyketsos, C., Jagust, W., Ives, D., DeKosky, S. T., & Kuller, L. H. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53360.x · Cited by 492
Metadata
- Authors
- Jorm, A. F., & Korten, A. E.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 1988-02
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-213
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2114563850
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
