Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 367

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Disulfiram Treatment of Alcoholism

Chick, Jonathan, Gough, Kevin, Falkowski, Wojciech, Kershaw, Peter, Hore, Brian, Mehta, Brij, Ritson, Bruce, Ropner, Richard, Torley, Denis·1992·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

To assess the efficacy of supervised disulfiram as an adjunct to out-patient treatment of alcoholics, a randomised, partially blind, six-month follow-up study was conducted in which 126 patients received 200 mg disulfiram or 100 mg vitamin C under the supervision of a nominated informant. In the opinion of the (blinded) independent assessor, patients on disulfiram increased average total abstinent days by 100 and patients on vitamin C by 69, thus enhancing by one-third this measure of treatment outcome. Mean weekly alcohol consumption was reduced by 162 units with disulfiram, compared with 105 units with vitamin C., and the disulfiram patients reduced their total six-month alcohol consumption by 2572 units compared with an average reduction of 1448 units in the vitamin C group. Serum gamma-GT showed a mean fall of 21 IU/I in patients on disulfiram but rose by a mean of 13 IU/I with vitamin C. Unwanted effects in the disulfiram group led to a dose reduction in seven patients and to treatment withdrawal in four (and in one vitamin C patient). Two-thirds of the disulfiram group asked to continue the treatment at the end of the study. There were no medically serious adverse reactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.161.1.84

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1988.tb00180.x · DOI
  2. 10.7326/0003-4819-90-6-901 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Edwards, 1974, Alcoholism clinic in a military setting: a combined disulfiram and group therapy outpatient program, Military Medicine, 139, 206, 10.1093/milmed/139.3.206 · DOI
  4. 10.1097/00001504-198805000-00013 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/978-1-4613-3626-6_10 · DOI
  6. Vaillant, 1983, Natural History of Alcoholism.
  7. 10.1001/archpsyc.1973.01750360034004 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb00760.x · DOI
  9. Searle, 1971, Linear Models.
  10. 10.1016/0005-7967(76)90028-0 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/1097-4679(198401)40:1<340::AID-JCLP2270400162>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0005-7967(79)90107-4 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/01621459.1980.10477577 · DOI
  14. 10.1136/bmj.299.6697.471 · DOI
  15. Bourne, 1966, Treatment of skid-row alcoholics with disulfiram, Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 27, 42, 10.15288/qjsa.1966.27.042 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1986.tb05092.x · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0740-5472(86)90002-4 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1983.tb05502.x · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1988.tb03977.x · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0140-6736(81)92413-2 · DOI

Cited by

See all 367

Metadata

Authors
Chick, J., Gough, K., Falkowski, W., Kershaw, P., Hore, B., Mehta, B., Ritson, B., Ropner, R., & Torley, D.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1992-07
Volume
161
Issue
1
Pages
84-89
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W1977850625
Cited by
367
References
2
FWCI
11.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.