Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 379

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychological therapies for adults with anorexia nervosa: Randomised controlled trial of out-patient treatments

Open access
Dare, Chris, Eisler, Ivan, Russell, Gerald, Treasure, Janet, Dodge, Liz·2001·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Currently, without systematic evidence, psychotherapy for anorexia nervosa in adults draws on psychodynamic, cognitive and systemic theories. Aims: To assess effectiveness of specific psychotherapies in out-patient management of adult patients with anorexia nervosa. Method: Eighty-four patients were randomised to four treatments: three specific psychotherapies – (a) a year of focal psychoanalytic psychotherapy; (b) 7 months of cognitive-analytic therapy (CAT); (c) family therapy for 1 year – and (d) low contact, ‘routine’ treatment for 1 year (control). Results: At 1 year, there was symptomatic improvement in the whole group of patients. This improvement was modest, several patients being significantly undernourished at follow-up. Psychoanalytic psychotherapy and family therapy were significantly superior to the control treatment; CAT tended to show benefits. Conclusions: Psychoanalytic and family therapy are of specific value in the out-patient treatment of adult patients with anorexia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.178.3.216

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Dare, C., Eisler, I., Russell, G., Treasure, J., & Dodge, L.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2001-03
Volume
178
Issue
3
Pages
216-221
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W1995199463
Cited by
379
References
1
FWCI
26.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.