Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomised controlled trial of cognitive-behavioural therapy in early schizophrenia: Acute-phase outcomes

Open access
Lewis, Shôn, Tarrier, Nicholas, Haddock, Gillian, Bentall, Richard, Kinderman, Peter, Kingdon, David, Siddle, Ronald, Drake, Richard, Everitt, Julie, Leadley, Karen, Benn, Andy, Grazebrook, Katy, Haley, Cliff, Akhtar, Shahid, Davies, Linda, Palmer, Steve, Faragher, Brian, Dunn, Graham·2002·British Journal of Psychiatry
DOI 10.1192/bjp.181.43.s91
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background: Cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) improves persistent psychotic symptoms. Aims: To test the effectiveness of added CBT in accelerating remission from acute psychotic symptoms in early schizophrenia. Method: A 5-week CBT programme plus routine care was compared with supportive counselling plus routine care and routine care alone in a multi-centre trial randomising 315 people with DSM–IV schizophrenia and related disorders in their first (83%) or second acute admission. Outcome assessments were blinded. Results: Linear regression over 70 days showed predicted trends towards faster improvement in the CBT group. Uncorrected univariate comparisons showed significant benefits at 4 but not 6 weeks for CBTv. routine care alone on Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total and positive sub-scale scores and delusion score and benefits v. supportive counselling for auditory hallucinations score. Conclusions: CBT shows transient advantages over routine care alone or supportive counselling in speeding remission from acute symptoms in early schizophrenia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.181.43.s91

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 1997, Stata Statistical Software. Release 6.0

Cited by

See all 373

Metadata

Authors
Lewis, S., Tarrier, N., Haddock, G., Bentall, R., Kinderman, P., Kingdon, D., Siddle, R., Drake, R., Everitt, J., Leadley, K., Benn, A., Grazebrook, K., Haley, C., Akhtar, S., Davies, L., Palmer, S., Faragher, B., & Dunn, G.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Published
2002-09
Volume
181
Issue
S43
Pages
s91-s97
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
DOI
10.1192/bjp.181.43.s91
OpenAlex
W2123091382
Cited by
373
References
20
FWCI
14.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 5602 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomised controlled trial of cognitive-behavioural therapy in early schizophrenia: Acute-phase outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1192/bjp.181.43.s91
The paper
Lewis, S., Tarrier, N., Haddock, G., Bentall, R., Kinderman, P., Kingdon, D., Siddle, R., Drake, R., Everitt, J., Leadley, K., Benn, A., Grazebrook, K., Haley, C., Akhtar, S., Davies, L., Palmer, S., Faragher, B., & Dunn, G. (2002). Randomised controlled trial of cognitive-behavioural therapy in early schizophrenia: Acute-phase outcomes. British Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.181.43.s91

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.