Cited by 154Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Tapering off Long-Term Benzodiazepine Use with or without Group Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy: Three-Condition, Randomised Controlled Trial

Open access
Voshaar, Richard C. Oude, Gorgels, Wim J. M. J., Mol, Audrey J. J., Van Balkom, Anton J. L. M., Van De Lisdonk, Eloy H., Breteler, Marinus H. M., Van Den Hoogen, J. M., Zitman, Frans G.·2003·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Benzodiazepine withdrawal programmes have never been experimentally compared with a nonintervention control condition. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of tapering off long-term benzodiazepine use in general practice, and to evaluate the value of additional group cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT). Method: A 3-month randomised, controlled trial was conducted in which 180 people attempting to discontinue long-term benzodiazepine use were assigned to tapering off plus group CBT, tapering off alone or usual care. Results: Tapering off led to a significantly higher proportion of successful discontinuations than usual care (62% v. 21%). Adding group CBT did not increase the success rate (58% v. 62%). Neither successful discontinuation nor intervention type affected psychological functioning. Both tapering strategies showed good feasibility in general practice. Conclusions: Tapering off is a feasible and effective way of discontinuing long-term benzodiazepine use in general practice. The addition of group CBT is of limited value.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.182.6.498

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only 36% of patients were able to successfully stop their benzodiazepine in a similar trial with a 4-week taper at 15-month follow-up.

    “Only 36% of patients were able to successfully stop their benzodiazepine in a similar trial with a 4-week taper at 15-month follow-up (Voshaar et al., 2003).”

    From Pharmacological principles for safe benzodiazepine and Z-drug dose reduction (2026) · cites this paper as Voshaar et al., 2003

    The Intervention section describes a four-week taper, so that part matches. But Table 2 reports outcomes at three months, not 15 months: successful discontinuation in the taper-only group was 51% of the whole assigned group or 62% of those who completed follow-up, not 36%. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Clinical trials evaluating BZD tapering strategies typically have relatively fast and inflexible dose reduction schedules and often have high patient dropout.

    “Clinical trials evaluating BZD tapering strategies, which typically have relatively fast (e.g., 25% every 1–2 weeks) and inflexible dose reduction schedules, often have high patient dropout.75–77”

    From Joint Clinical Practice Guideline on Benzodiazepine Tapering: Considerations When Risks Outweigh Benefits (2025) · cites this paper as [76]

    The Intervention section (page not available) describes a relatively fast, largely fixed schedule: a 25% dose reduction each week for four weeks, with an option to split the last step. The Study profile reports that 39 participants refused outcome assessment, but this single trial does not establish that tapering trials typically use inflexible schedules or often have high dropout. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The second study showing no added value of CBT for withdrawal (62% versus 58%) targeted neither insomnia nor anxiety but supported participants during tapering and focused on withdrawal symptoms only.

    “The second study (62% versus 58%) [121] targeted neither insomnia nor anxiety but “supported the participants during the tapering-off process and in preventing relapse” and focused on withdrawal symptoms only.”

    From Cognitive behavioral therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy for the discontinuation of long-term benzodiazepine use in insomnia and anxiety disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [121]

    The Results report 58% discontinuation with group CBT versus 62% with tapering alone, with no increase in success from adding CBT. The Group cognitive–behavioural therapy section says the sessions aimed to support participants during tapering and prevent relapse; our copy also mentions restructuring interpretations of withdrawal symptoms. It does not establish that the therapy focused on withdrawal symptoms only or explicitly rule out insomnia and anxiety as targets. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • To date, there is no manualized and standardized CBT program specifically targeting BZD use disorder alone, although a proposal has been made without benefits compared with short interventions.

    “To date, there is no manualized and standardized CBT program specifically targeting BZD use disorder alone, although a proposal has been made in this vein, but without benefits compared with short interventions [121].”

    From Cognitive behavioral therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy for the discontinuation of long-term benzodiazepine use in insomnia and anxiety disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [121]

    The Group cognitive-behavioural therapy section describes a detailed manual for CBT added to benzodiazepine tapering. The Results report that adding group CBT did not improve discontinuation compared with tapering alone (58% versus 62%). The paper does not establish the broader claim that no manualized, standardized CBT program targets benzodiazepine use disorder alone, and its comparator was tapering alone rather than short interventions generally. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Oude Voshaar et al. evaluated the same pace and found that nearly a quarter of participants dropped out.

    “Oude Voshaar et al.76 evaluated the same pace and found that nearly a quarter of participants dropped out.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 154

Authors
Voshaar, R. C. O., Gorgels, W. J. M. J., Mol, A. J. J., Van Balkom, A. J. L. M., Van De Lisdonk, E. H., Breteler, M. H. M., Van Den Hoogen, J. M., & Zitman, F. G.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Voshaar, Richard C. Oude
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2003-06
Volume
182
Issue
6
Pages
498-504
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2169651283
Cited by
154
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
benzodiazepine tapering, benzodiazepine withdrawal, long-term benzodiazepine use, group cognitive behavioral therapy, benzodiazepine discontinuation, general practice, psychological functioning, feasibility
MeSH terms
Aged, Analysis of Variance, Attitude of Health Personnel, Combined Modality Therapy, Diazepam, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Long-Term Care, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Psychotherapy, Group, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review