Cited by 9Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingPsychiatric care and mental health services

Suicide risk assessment tools do not perform worse than clinical judgement

Open access
Fazel, Seena, Wolf, Achim·2017·British Journal of Psychiatry

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.211.3.183

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Structured tools can provide a baseline assessment, offer a checklist of risk factors, and lead to interventions for people predicted to be at high risk for suicide.

    “Nevertheless, structured tools can provide a baseline assessment during initial contact with health care providers, offer a checklist to identify risk factors, and lead to interventions for those persons who are predicted to be at high risk for suicide.49,50”

    From Suicide (2020) · cites this paper as [50]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fazel, S., & Wolf, A.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2017-09
Volume
211
Issue
3
Pages
183-183
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2624420973
Cited by
9
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (202836/Z/16/Z, 202836)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
suicide risk assessment, risk assessment tools, clinical judgment, suicide risk prediction
MeSH terms
Prospective Studies, Suicide, Self-Injurious Behavior, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review