The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of perceived organisational factors on job burnout: survey of community mental health staff.
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Staff burnout is a critical issue for mental healthcare delivery, as it can lead to decreased work performance and, ultimately, to poorer treatment outcomes. AIMS: To explore the relative weight of job-related characteristics and perceived organisational factors in predicting burnout in staff working in community-based psychiatric services. METHOD: A representative sample of 2000 mental health staff working in the Veneto region, Italy, participated. Burnout and perceived organisational factors were assessed by using the Organizational Checkup Survey. RESULTS: Overall, high levels of job distress affected nearly two-thirds of the psychiatric staff and one in five staff members suffered from burnout. Psychiatrists and social workers reported the highest levels of burnout, and support workers and psychologists, the lowest. Burnout was mostly predicted by a higher frequency of face-to-face interaction with users, longer tenure in mental healthcare, weak work group cohesion and perceived unfairness. CONCLUSIONS: Improving the workplace atmosphere within psychiatric services should be one of the most important targets in staff burnout prevention strategies. The potential benefits of such programmes may, in turn, have a favourable impact on patient outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“One of the most consistent predictors of EBS across healthcare providers is high caseload/client contact [10, 136–138].”
From Interventions to address empathy-based stress in mental health workers: A scoping review and research agenda (2024) · cites this paper as [137]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397 · Cited by 12,852
Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults
Kleinstäuber, M., Witthöft, M., Steffanowski, A., van Marwijk, H., Hiller, W., & Lambert, M. J. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010628.pub2 · Cited by 11,369
Job Resources Buffer the Impact of Job Demands on Burnout.
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Euwema, M. C. (2005) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.10.2.170 · Cited by 2,483
Early predictors of job burnout and engagement.
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.498 · Cited by 2,397
Maslach, C. (1982) · Cited by 2,389
Champion, D. F., & Westbrook, B. W. (1984) · Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development · doi:10.1080/07481756.1984.12022754 · Cited by 2,389
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1979) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t55656-000 · Cited by 2,360
The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration.
Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210 · Cited by 1,398
Prevention of burnout: New perspectives
Maslach, C., & Goldberg, J. H. (1998) · Applied and Preventive Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0962-1849(98)80022-x · Cited by 991
Maslach burnout inventory-general survey
김, 영. (2009) · Cited by 907
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 2008, National NHS Staff Survey 2007: Summary of Key Findings
- Rabe-Hesketh, 2004, GLLAMM Manual
- Leiter, 2000, Organizational Checkup Survey
- Leiter, 2004, Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being, Vol. 3: Emotional and Physiological Processes and Positive Intervention Strategies, 91
- Pajak, 2003, Workload and Working Patterns in Consultant Psychiatrists. An Investigation into Occupational Pressure and Burdens
- Maslach, 1997, The Truth about Burnout
- 2001, Finding and Keeping: Review of Recruitment and Retention in the Mental Health Workforce
- Borgogni, 2005, Il questionario di Checkup Organizzativo. Manuale dell'adattamento italiano [Organisational Checkup Survey
- Schaufeli, 2000, UBOS Utrecht Burnout Scale: Manual
Cited by
Sorted by citations
O’Connor, K., Muller Neff, D., & Pitman, S. (2018) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.06.003 · Cited by 555
Lasalvia, A., Amaddeo, F., Porru, S., Carta, A., Tardivo, S., Bovo, C., Ruggeri, M., & Bonetto, C. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045127 · Cited by 324
Self-citationRay, S. L., Wong, C. A., White, D. M., & Heaslip, K. (2013) · Traumatology An International Journal · doi:10.1177/1534765612471144 · Cited by 283
Fiabane, E., Giorgi, I., Sguazzin, C., & Argentero, P. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.12084 · Cited by 236
Rossi, A., Cetrano, G., Pertile, R., Rabbi, L., Donisi, V., Grigoletti, L., Curtolo, C., Tansella, M., Thornicroft, G., & Amaddeo, F. (2012) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.07.029 · Cited by 235
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lasalvia, A., Bonetto, C., Bertani, M., Bissoli, S., Cristofalo, D., Marrella, G., Ceccato, E., Cremonese, C., De Rossi, M., Lazzarotto, L., Marangon, V., Morandin, I., Zucchetto, M., Tansella, M., & PICOS-Veneto Group
- Affiliations
- University of Verona (IT)
- University of Padua (IT)
- Ospedale di Mirano (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Lasalvia, Antonio
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 195
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 537-544
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2159852293
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 13.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Università degli Studi di Padova
- Università degli Studi di Verona
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Keywords
- burnout, mental health professionals, community mental health services, organizational factors, team cohesion, perceived injustice, employee turnover, burnout prevention, workplace atmosphere, social workers, psychiatrists, support staff, psychologists
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Allied Health Personnel, Burnout, Professional, Community Health Nursing, Community Mental Health Services, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Social Work, Socioeconomic Factors, Organizational Culture, Workload, Workplace
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
